The Sustainable Development Goals and REDD+: assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies

This paper analyzes potential synergies between two recent sustainable development initiatives, namely the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), a climate mitigation mechanism negotiated under the auspices of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. The paper elaborates a conceptual framework based on institutional interactions and distinguishes core, complementary, and supplementary synergies that may be realized between the SDGs and REDD+. Potential synergies are analyzed at the global level, as well as within two national-level contexts: Indonesia, with its long-standing REDD+ programme, and Myanmar, which is in the early stages of implementing REDD+. Both are now also engaging nationally with the SDG implementation process. Our research draws on literature review and document analysis, direct observations of global policy processes relating to REDD+ and SDGs, as well as extensive engagement (of one author) at national level in Indonesia and Myanmar. Our analysis reveals that there are currently significant opportunities to pursue synergies in the implementation of these international initiatives at the national level, although pro-active interaction management is necessary, especially to achieve complementary synergies.

[1]  Stephen D. Krasner.  Structural causes and regime consequences: regimes as intervening variables , 1982, International Organization.

[2]  Edith Brown Weiss,et al.  International Environmental Law: Contemporary Issues and the Emergence of a New World Order , 1993 .

[3]  G. Young.  Institutional Linkages in International Society: Polar Perspectives , 1996 .

[4]  J. Golub.  The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. By Oran R. Young. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2002. 221p. $55.00 cloth, $21.95 paper , 2003, Perspectives on Politics.

[5]  D. Victor,et al.  The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources , 2004, International Organization.

[6]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  Institutional interaction in global environmental governance : synergy and conflict among international and EU policies , 2006 .

[7]  A. Underdal.  Determining the Causal Significance of Institutions: Accomplishments and Challenges , 2008 .

[8]  Oran R. Young,et al.  Institutions and Environmental Change: The Scientific Legacy of a Decade of IDGEC Research , 2008 .

[9]  Jan Vandemoortele,et al.  The MDG Conundrum: Meeting the Targets Without Missing the Point , 2009 .

[10]  S. Oberthür.  Interplay management: enhancing environmental policy integration among international institutions , 2009 .

[11]  Dominic Stead,et al.  Spatial Planning and Policy Integration: Concepts, Facilitators and Inhibitors , 2009 .

[12]  P. Pattberg,et al.  The Fragmentation of Global Governance Architectures: A Framework for Analysis , 2009, Global Environmental Politics.

[13]  Sebastian Oberthür,et al.  The Causal Mechanisms of Interaction between International Institutions , 2009 .

[14]  Karen J. Alter,et al.  The Politics of International Regime Complexity , 2009, Perspectives on Politics.

[15]  Joyeeta Gupta,et al.  Energy security in a developing world , 2011 .

[16]  Jim Whitman,et al.  The Millennium Development Goals and Development after 2015 , 2011 .

[17]  M. Herold,et al.  Will REDD+work? The need for interdisciplinary research to address key challenges , 2012 .

[18]  Eva Lövbrand,et al.  In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems , 2012 .

[19]  J. Sachs.  From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals , 2012, The Lancet.

[20]  B. Cashore,et al.  Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+. , 2012 .

[21]  Markus Loewe,et al.  Post 2015: how to reconcile the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)? , 2012 .

[22]  M. Herold,et al.  Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation: A synthesis report for REDD+ policymakers , 2012 .

[23]  H. van Asselt,et al.  Introduction: The Institutional Fragmentation of Global Environmental Governance: Causes, Consequences, and Responses , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.

[24]  I. Visseren-Hamakers.  Partnerships and Sustainable Development: the Lessons Learned from International Biodiversity Governance , 2013 .

[25]  The Contested Legacy of Rio+20 , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.

[26]  H. Asselt,et al.  Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism? , 2013 .

[27]  I. Visseren-Hamakers,et al.  Promoting Non-carbon Benefits in REDD+ Actions , 2014 .

[28]  B. Arts,et al.  The evolution of REDD+: An analysis of discursive-institutional dynamics , 2014 .

[29]  M. Levy,et al.  Coherent governance, the UN and the SDGs , 2014 .

[30]  M. Levy,et al.  Earth System Challenges and A Multi-layered Approach for the Sustainable Development Goals , 2014 .

[31]  Aarti Gupta,et al.  Framing REDD+ in India: Carbonizing and centralizing Indian forest governance? , 2014 .

[32]  Will Steffen,et al.  An integrated framework for sustainable development goals , 2014 .

[33]  M. Brockhaus,et al.  Multi-Level Policy Dialogues, Processes, and Actions: Challenges and Opportunities for National REDD+ Safeguards Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) , 2014 .

[34]  Frans Berkhout,et al.  Beyond Cockpit-ism: Four Insights to Enhance the Transformative Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals , 2015 .

[35]  Aarti Gupta,et al.  Drivers of deforestation and REDD+ benefit-sharing: A meta-analysis of the (missing) link , 2015 .

[36]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Policy: Five priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals , 2015, Nature.

[37]  Valentin F. Lang,et al.  Defining and Measuring Poverty and Inequality Post‐2015 , 2015 .

[38]  I. Visseren-Hamakers.  Integrative environmental governance: enhancing governance in the era of synergies , 2015 .

[39]  INTENDED NATIONALLY DETERMINED CONTRIBUTION FROM THE PLURINATIONAL STATE OF BOLIVIA , 2015 .

[40]  T. Pistorius,et al.  Managing fragmentation in global environmental governance: the REDD+ Partnership as bridge organization , 2016, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[41]  Joyeeta Gupta,et al.  Sustainable development goals and inclusive development , 2016, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[42]  Un Desa.  Transforming our world : The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , 2016 .

[43]  I. Visseren-Hamakers,et al.  A reality check on the landscape approach to REDD+: Lessons from Latin America , 2017 .

[44]  A. Ziegler,et al.  Untangling the proximate causes and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar , 2017, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.