Determinants involved in the perception of the Necker cube: an application of catastrophe theory.

The study is concerned with evaluating interactions at the organic level within the visual perception subsystem of living systems. The reported work focuses on the identification of some of the determinants of multistable perception by experimentally testing a nonlinear dynamical systems (catastrophe) model of the Necker Cube. This technique serves as an advantage over linear threshold models which cannot effectively study multivalued functional relationships. It was proposed that manipulation of two independent control parameters (bias or changing shape by continuously varying perspective lines and selective stimulus shading) was compatible with the subjective dichotomy of bistable perception of the Necker cube. One hundred and twenty naive subjects, categorized by age, sex, and optical aids, were presented with a computer-generated sequence of 63 stimuli (7 shading levels X 9 perspective levels) to which they had to respond as to whether they saw a "hollow" or "solid" image. The work revealed that bias and shading exerted their effects in opposition and that each influenced the other. Both were decisive factors involved in the perception of the cube. These findings are supported by topological and psychological evidence.

[1]  C. M. Solley,et al.  Perceptual Learning with Partial Verbal Reinforcement , 1958 .

[2]  S. Griew,et al.  Ageing and Human Skill , 1958 .

[3]  Ronald Olson,et al.  Reversibility of the Necker Cube: VIII. Parts of the Figure Contributing to the Perception of Reversals , 1966 .

[4]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Preparation of ambiguous stimulus materials , 1967 .

[5]  G. H. Fisher,et al.  Ambiguity of form: Old and new , 1968 .

[6]  F. Attneave,et al.  The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria , 1969 .

[7]  F. Attneave.  Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[8]  R. Haber,et al.  The psychology of visual perception , 1973 .

[9]  F. Campbell,et al.  Contrast and spatial frequency. , 1974, Scientific American.

[10]  C. A. Burnham,et al.  The first glimpse determines the perception of an ambiguous figure , 1975 .

[11]  Irwin Silverman,et al.  The Human Subject in the Psychological Laboratory , 1977 .

[12]  Brian R. Flay,et al.  CATASTROPHE THEORY IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY: SOME APPLICATIONS TO ATTITUDES AND SOCIAL BEHAVIOR' , 1978 .

[13]  T Poston,et al.  Nonlinear modeling of multistable perception. , 1978, Behavioral science.

[14]  Loren Cobb,et al.  Stochastic catastrophe models and multimodal distributions , 1978 .

[15]  J. S. Baker,et al.  A cusp catastrophe: Hysteresis, bimodality, and inaccessibility in rabbit eyelid conditioning , 1979 .

[16]  R. A. Weale,et al.  Focus on Vision , 1982 .

[17]  I. Stewart,et al.  Catastrophe theory modeling in psychology. , 1983 .