The moisture effect on the fatigue crack growth of glass particle and fiber reinforced epoxies with strong and weak bonding conditions. Part 1. Macroscopic fatigue crack propagation behavior

Abstract The fatigue crack propagation behavior of glass-filled epoxy composites with three different types of reinforcements was characterized. Moreover, the underlying mechanisms operating in fatigue were identified using da/dN vs. ΔK curves according to the model proposed by other investigators. The effect of moisture was studied. In particular, the role of adhesion promoters in fatigue crack propagation behavior was determined by treating the glass reinforcements with silane-based adhesion promoters. The fatigue crack propagation behavior with moisture exposure was strongly dependent on the surface treatment of the reinforcements and poor matrix–particle adhesion resulted in better fatigue crack propagation resistance. An investigation revealed that the specific toughening mechanism contributing to fatigue crack propagation behavior depended on the type of reinforcement and the surface treatment. Glass spheres treated with n-butyltrimethoxysilane exhibited crack tip shielding mechanisms involving shear yielding whereas short glass fiber treated with aminopropyltrimethoxysilane exhibited contact shielding mechanisms involving fiber bridging and wedging due to asperities generated between fracture surfaces. Interestingly, the type of adhesion promoters had a significant influence on the type of toughening mechanism observed.

[1]  Anthony J. Kinloch,et al.  Micromechanisms of crack propagation in hybrid-particulate composites , 1985 .

[2]  P. Bowden.  A criterion for inhomogeneous plastic deformation , 1970 .

[3]  Yoshinobu Nakamura,et al.  Effect of particle size on the fracture toughness of epoxy resin filled with spherical silica , 1992 .

[4]  P. Beaumont,et al.  The toughness of a composite containing short brittle fibres , 1988 .

[5]  J. Gérard,et al.  Epoxy composites based on glass beads. II. Mechanical properties , 1992 .

[6]  J. W. Smith,et al.  Examination of the processes of deformation and fracture in a silica-filled epoxy resin , 1990 .

[7]  Robert J. Young,et al.  Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin , 1984 .

[8]  A. Gent.  Detachment of an elastic matrix from a rigid spherical inclusion , 1980 .

[9]  Takafumi Kawaguchi,et al.  The moisture effect on the fatigue crack growth of glass particle and fiber reinforced epoxies with strong and weak bonding conditions: Part 2. A microscopic study on toughening mechanism , 2004 .

[10]  A. Yee,et al.  Role of inherent matrix toughness on fracture of glass bead filled epoxies , 2000 .

[11]  H. Kausch,et al.  The fracture of particulate-filled epoxide resins , 1984 .

[12]  A. Yee,et al.  Fracture behavior of glass bead filled epoxies: Cleaning process of glass beads , 2001 .

[13]  A. Yee,et al.  Toughening mechanisms in elastomer-modified epoxies , 1986 .

[14]  D. Heikens,et al.  Shear band formation in polycarbonate-glass bead composites , 1984 .

[15]  L. Nielsen.  Simple theory of stress-strain properties of filled polymers† , 1966 .

[16]  S. J. Shaw,et al.  Deformation and fracture behaviour of a rubber-toughened epoxy: 1. Microstructure and fracture studies , 1983 .

[17]  W. Cantwell,et al.  Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate-filled epoxy resins , 1987 .

[18]  A. Yee,et al.  Study of fracture mechanisms of multiphase polymers using the double-notch four-point-bending method , 1993, Journal of Materials Science.

[19]  R. Ritchie.  Mechanisms of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: Role of crack tip shielding☆ , 1988 .

[20]  R. Young,et al.  A predictive model for particulate filled composite materials , 1989 .

[21]  A. Evans,et al.  On the toughening of ceramics by strong reinforcements , 1986 .

[22]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  Role of crack tip shielding mechanisms in fatigue of hybrid epoxy composites containing rubber and solid glass spheres , 1995 .

[23]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Crack deflection processes—I. Theory , 1983 .

[24]  I. Narisawa,et al.  The effect of heat treatment on plane strain fracture of glassy polymers , 1983 .

[25]  F. F. Lange,et al.  The interaction of a crack front with a second-phase dispersion , 1970 .

[26]  Robert J. Young,et al.  Crack propagation in a glass particle-filled epoxy resin , 1984 .

[27]  Lorenz S. Sigl,et al.  Effect of Interface Mechanical Properties on Pullout in a SiC‐Fiber‐Reinforced Lithium Aluminum Silicate Glass‐Ceramic , 1989 .

[28]  R. Hertzberg,et al.  Fatigue of rubber-modified epoxies: effect of particle size and volume fraction , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[29]  R. Pearson,et al.  The effect of particle -matrix adhesion on the mechanical behavior of glass filled epoxies. Part 2. A study on fracture toughness , 2003 .

[30]  A. Yee,et al.  Fracture of glass bead/epoxy composites: on micro-mechanical deformations , 2000 .

[31]  H. Kausch,et al.  Parameters determining the strength and toughness of particulate filled epoxide resins , 1987 .

[32]  A. Evans,et al.  On the toughness of particulate filled polymers , 1985 .

[33]  R. Pearson,et al.  Role of particle cavitation in rubber-toughened epoxies: 1. Microvoid toughening , 1996 .

[34]  A. Yee,et al.  Inorganic particle toughening II: toughening mechanisms of glass bead filled epoxies , 2001 .

[35]  Takafumi Kawaguchi,et al.  The effect of particle - matrix adhesion on the mechanical behavior of glass filled epoxies: Part 1. A study on yield behavior and cohesive strength , 2003 .

[36]  Peter G. Pape,et al.  Methods for improving the performance of silane coupling agents , 1991 .

[37]  H. Kausch,et al.  The fracture of particulate-filled epoxide resins , 1983 .

[38]  J. Gérard,et al.  Fatigue behaviour of glass bead filled epoxy , 1995, Journal of Materials Science.

[39]  A. Yee,et al.  Inorganic particle toughening I: micro-mechanical deformations in the fracture of glass bead filled epoxies , 2001 .