Effect of relative humidity on the accuracy, scanning time, and number of photograms of dentate complete arch intraoral digital scans.

[1]  J. Kois,et al.  Scanning accuracy and scanning area discrepancies of intraoral digital scans acquired at varying scanning distances and angulations among 4 different intraoral scanners. , 2023, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[2]  J. Kois,et al.  A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans: Part 2-Patient factors. , 2023, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[3]  J. Kois,et al.  A guide for maximizing the accuracy of intraoral digital scans. Part 1: Operator factors. , 2022, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[4]  S. Rues,et al.  Influence of artificial landmarks on the accuracy of complete arch scans in the partially edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[5]  N. Alharbi,et al.  Does the palatal vault form have an influence on the scan time and accuracy of intraoral scans of completely edentulous arches? An in-vitro study , 2022, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[6]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of the surface humidity, implant angulation, and interimplant distance on the accuracy and scanning time of complete-arch implant scans. , 2022, Journal of dentistry.

[7]  João Paulo Mendes Tribst,et al.  Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  Hai Yen Mai,et al.  Impact of scanning strategy on the accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans: a preliminary study on segmental scans and merge methods , 2022, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[9]  C. Gómez-Polo,et al.  Influence of the implant scan body geometry bevel feature position, implant angulation, and position on intraoral scanning accuracy: An in vitro study. , 2022, Journal of dentistry.

[10]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of definitive and interim restorative materials and surface finishing on the scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner. , 2022, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  Sakaorat Pattamavilai,et al.  Accuracy of intraoral scanners in different complete arch scan patterns. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  R. Belli,et al.  Influence of Simulated Oral Conditions on Different Pretreatment Methods for the Repair of Glass-Ceramic Restorations. , 2022, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[13]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of ambient temperature changes on intraoral scanning accuracy. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  J. Kois,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the effects of cutting off, overlapping, and rescanning procedures on intraoral scanning accuracy. , 2022, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  J. Kois,et al.  Influence of rescanning mesh holes on the accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vivo study. , 2021, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  Ana Larisse Carneiro Pereira,et al.  Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review. , 2021, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  C. Gómez-Polo,et al.  Techniques to improve the accuracy of complete-arch implant intraoral digital scans: A systematic review. , 2021, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  O. Urquhart,et al.  Intraoral scanners: An American Dental Association Clinical Evaluators Panel survey. , 2021, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[19]  Mohammed M Methani,et al.  Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. , 2021, Journal of dentistry.

[20]  T. Matsuoka,et al.  Influence of Liquid on the Tooth Surface on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study. , 2021, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[21]  Steven M. Morgano,et al.  Evaluation of the accuracy of 2 digital intraoral scanners: A 3D analysis study. , 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[22]  Hasan Camcı,et al.  Effect of saliva isolation and intraoral light levels on performance of intraoral scanners. , 2020, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[23]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Analysis of Different Illuminance of the Room Lighting Condition on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of An Intraoral Scanner. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[24]  Fang-Yu Su,et al.  Use of intraoral scan for implant-supported dental prosthesis to design and fabricate a CAD-CAM verification device: A dental technique. , 2020, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[25]  J. Borbély,et al.  Learning curve of digital intraoral scanning – an in vivo study , 2020, BMC oral health.

[26]  Ji-Man Park,et al.  Effects of Scanning Strategy and Scanner Type on the Accuracy of Intraoral Scans: A New Approach for Assessing the Accuracy of Scanned Data. , 2020, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[27]  B. Wöstmann,et al.  Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  Minji Kim,et al.  Accuracy on Scanned Images of Full Arch Models with Orthodontic Brackets by Various Intraoral Scanners in the Presence of Artificial Saliva , 2020, BioMed research international.

[29]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Intraoral digital scans: Part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[30]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. , 2019, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[31]  Vinayak R. Krishnamurthy,et al.  Intraoral digital scans-Part 1: Influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the accuracy (trueness and precision) of different intraoral scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[32]  M. Özcan,et al.  Influence of scan body design and digital implant analogs on implant replica position in additively manufactured casts. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[33]  K. Suese Progress in digital dentistry: The practical use of intraoral scanners. , 2019, Dental materials journal.

[34]  Thierry Bacro,et al.  Effect of scan substrates on accuracy of 7 intraoral digital impression systems using human maxilla model. , 2019, Orthodontics & craniofacial research.

[35]  Kyu-Bok Lee,et al.  Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete‐arch digital scan , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[36]  Mark Ludlow,et al.  Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners. , 2019, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[37]  L. D'arienzo,et al.  Comparison of the suitability of intra-oral scanning with conventional impression of edentulous maxilla in vivo. A preliminary study , 2018 .

[38]  Joshua C Treesh,et al.  Complete‐arch accuracy of intraoral scanners , 2018, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[39]  Won-Jin Yi,et al.  A comparison of the accuracy of intraoral scanners using an intraoral environment simulator , 2018, The journal of advanced prosthodontics.

[40]  L. Franchi,et al.  Accuracy, reliability, and efficiency of intraoral scanners for full-arch impressions: a systematic review of the clinical evidence. , 2016, European journal of orthodontics.

[41]  Y. Xiong,et al.  Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impressions for Whole Upper Jaws, Including Full Dentitions and Palatal Soft Tissues , 2016, PloS one.

[42]  C. Flores‐Mir,et al.  Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review. , 2016, European journal of orthodontics.

[43]  T. Attin,et al.  In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. , 2016, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[44]  Toshiko Sugiyama,et al.  Influence of different rubber dam application on intraoral temperature and relative humidity. , 2014, The Bulletin of Tokyo Dental College.

[45]  A. Kameyama,et al.  The effects of three dry-field techniques on intraoral temperature and relative humidity. , 2011, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[46]  A. Cavalcanti,et al.  Intraoral environment conditions and their influence on marginal leakage in composite resin restorations. , 2010, Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL.

[47]  Sebastian Quaas,et al.  Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[48]  K. Williams,et al.  Influence of environmental conditions on dental composite flexural properties. , 2006, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[49]  D. Charlton Effect of humidity on the volumetric polymerization shrinkage of resin restorative materials. , 2006, General dentistry.

[50]  D. Charlton,et al.  Volumetric polymerization shrinkage of resin composites under simulated intraoral temperature and humidity conditions. , 2005, Operative dentistry.

[51]  J. Attal,et al.  Simulated oral environment and microleakage of Class II resin-based composite and sandwich restorations. , 2003, American Journal of Dentistry.

[52]  P. Plasmans,et al.  Intraoral humidity during operative procedures. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[53]  P. Plasmans,et al.  Air humidity: a detrimental factor in dentine adhesion. , 1993, Journal of dentistry.