Permeability semivariograms, geological structure, and flow performance

Clastic sediments may have a strong deterministic component to their permeability variation. This structure may be seen in the experimental semivariogram, but published geostatislical studies have not always exploited this feature during data analysis and covariance modeling. In this paper, we describe sedimentary organization, its importance for flow modeling, and how the semivariogram can be used for identification of structure. Clastic sedimentary structure occurs at several scales and is linked to the conditions of deposition. Lamination, bed, and bedset scales show repetitive and trend features that should be sampled carefully to assess the degree of organization and levels of heterogeneity. Interpretation of semivariograms is undertaken best with an appreciation of these geological units und how their features relate to the sampling program. Sampling at inappropriate intervals or with instruments having a large measurement volume, for example, may give misleading semivariograms. Flow simulations for models which include and ignore structure show that the repetitive features in permeability can change anisotropy and recovery performance significantly. If systematic variation is present, careful design of the permeability fields therefore is important particularly to preserve the structure effects.

[1]  P. K. Weyl,et al.  Influence of Texture on Porosity and Permeability of Unconsolidated Sand , 1973 .

[2]  Larry W. Lake,et al.  Patterns of Permeability in Eolian Deposits: Page Sandstone (Jurassic), Northeastern Arizona , 1988 .

[3]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Laminated Clastic Reservoirs: The Interplay of Capillary Pressure and Sedimentary Architecture , 1992 .

[4]  A. Hurst,et al.  Permeability heterogeneity within massive Jurassic submarine fan sandstones from the Miller Field, northern North Sea, UK , 1995, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[5]  Kenneth Stuart Sorbie,et al.  Immiscible flow behaviour in laminated and cross-bedded sandstones , 1993 .

[6]  Noel A Cressie,et al.  Statistics for Spatial Data. , 1992 .

[7]  M. Selim Yalin,et al.  Mechanics of sediment transport , 1972 .

[8]  Walther Schwarzacher,et al.  Sedimentation models and quantitative stratigraphy , 1975 .

[9]  J. Doyle,et al.  Which sub-seismic heterogeneities influence waterflood performance? A case study of a low net-to-gross fluvial reservoir , 1995, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[10]  H. Hardy The fractal character of photos of slabbed cores , 1992 .

[11]  J. R. Allen,et al.  Principles of physical sedimentology , 1985 .

[12]  R. Barnes Bounding the required sample size for geologic site characterization , 1988 .

[13]  P. Corbett,et al.  Variation Of Reservoir Statistics According To Sample Spacing And Measurement Type For Some Intervals In The Lower Brent Group , 1992 .

[14]  J. M. Shafer,et al.  Approximation of confidence limits on sample semivariograms from single realizations of spatially correlated random fields. , 1990 .

[15]  Ricardo A. Olea,et al.  Sampling design optimization for spatial functions , 1984 .

[16]  A. Journel,et al.  Entropy and spatial disorder , 1993 .

[17]  M. Brookfield The origin of bounding surfaces in ancient aeolian sandstones , 1977 .

[18]  Charles A. Kossack,et al.  Scaling up heterogeneities with pseudofunctions , 1990 .

[19]  A. Warrick,et al.  Optimization of Sampling Locations for Variogram Calculations , 1987 .

[20]  Jean Serra Les structures gigognes: morphologie mathématique et interprétation métallogénique , 1968 .

[21]  John L. Wilson,et al.  An approach to estimating hydraulic conductivity spatial correlation scales using geological characteristics , 1989 .

[22]  Allan D. Woodbury,et al.  The geostatistical characteristics of the borden aquifer , 1991 .

[23]  K. Sorbie,et al.  Relevant reservoir characterisation: Recovery process, geometry and scale , 1991 .

[24]  I. Rodríguez‐Iturbe,et al.  Random Functions and Hydrology , 1984 .

[25]  M Muskat,et al.  THE FLOW OF HOMOGENEOUS FLUIDS THROUGH POROUS MEDIA: ANALOGIES WITH OTHER PHYSICAL PROBLEMS , 1937 .

[26]  R. Martino,et al.  Fourier and Autocorrelation Analysis of Estuarine Tidal Rhythmites, Lower Breathitt Formation (Pennsylvanian), Eastern Kentucky, USA , 1993 .

[27]  Andrew D. Miall,et al.  Reservoir Heterogeneities in Fluvial Sandstones: Lessons from Outcrop Studies , 1988 .

[28]  A. J. Desbarats,et al.  Spatial averaging of hydraulic conductivity under radial flow conditions , 1994 .

[29]  A. S. Cullick,et al.  Effect of Rock Heterogeneity on Relative Permeability: Implications for Scale-up , 1995 .

[30]  P. Harris,et al.  Outcrop Analog for Cyclic-Shelf Reservoirs, San Andres Formation of Permian Basin: Stratigraphic Framework, Permeability Distribution, Geostatistics, and Fluid-Flow Modeling , 1994 .

[31]  A. Foscolos,et al.  Reservoir geology of Crystal Viking Field, Lower Cretaceous estuarine tidal channel-bay complex, south-central Alberta , 1988 .

[32]  W. Jury,et al.  A theoretical study of the estimation of the correlation scale in spatially variable fields: 2. Nonstationary fields , 1987 .

[33]  John L. Lumley,et al.  The structure of atmospheric turbulence , 1964 .

[34]  J. Wagoner,et al.  Siliciclastic sequence stratigraphy in well logs, cores, and outcrops , 1990 .

[35]  D. J. Prosser,et al.  SCALES OF PERMEABILITY HETEROGENEITY WITHIN THE BRENT GROUP , 1992 .

[36]  T. Kortekaas Water/Oil Displacement Characteristics in Crossbedded Reservoir Zones , 1985 .