Conceptualising Resourcefulness as a Dispersed Practice

In research on health and wellbeing, resourcefulness is seen as an important skill that can improve quality of life. In design and HCI literature, it has long been acknowledged that resourcefulness is about more than human skills and involves the adaptation, modification and reinvention of technologies in everyday life. In this paper we argue how certain aspects of resourcefulness have so far remained under-theorized, and present a new design perspective on resourcefulness that is grounded in practice theory. In this view, resourcefulness is conceptualised as the dispersed practice of dealing with everyday crises of routine. By elaborating on the complex interplay between means and purpose, we tease out resourcefulness as a practice of reconfiguration. The paper closes by discussing implications of this conceptualisation by zooming in on ways of capturing and designing for resourcefulness.

[1]  A. Warde.  Consumption and Theories of Practice , 2005 .

[2]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Self-control under stress: The role of learned resourcefulness☆ , 1989 .

[3]  T. Schatzki.  Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social , 1996 .

[4]  W. Keith Edwards,et al.  At Home with Ubiquitous Computing: Seven Challenges , 2001, UbiComp.

[5]  Jennie Carroll,et al.  Completing design in use: closing the appropriation cycle , 2004, ECIS.

[6]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: how are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? , 2008, NordiCHI.

[7]  Andreas Reckwitz.  Toward a Theory of Social Practices , 2002 .

[8]  Louis Neven,et al.  By any means? Questioning the link between gerontechnological innovation and older people's wish to live at home , 2015 .

[9]  Alexander Peine,et al.  The rise of the “innosumer”—Rethinking older technology users , 2014 .

[10]  Elisa Giaccardi,et al.  Design for Resourceful Ageing : Intervening in the Ethics of Gerontechnology , 2016 .

[11]  A. Costall,et al.  Doing Things with Things: The Design and Use of Everyday Objects , 2006 .

[12]  Chris Speed,et al.  Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[13]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  The Contribution of Domestication Research to In-Home Computing and Media Consumption , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[14]  John Zimmerman,et al.  An analysis and critique of Research through Design: towards a formalization of a research approach , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[15]  Laura N. Gitlin,et al.  Enhancing Resourcefulness to Improve Outcomes in Family Caregivers and Persons with Alzheimer's Disease: A Pilot Randomized Trial , 2014, International journal of Alzheimer's disease.

[16]  S. Hyysalo.  Representations of Use and Practice-Bound Imaginaries in Automating the Safety of the Elderly , 2006 .

[17]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[18]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[19]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Aspects of Everyday Design: Resourcefulness, Adaptation, and Emergence , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Unintentional non-adherence: can a spoon full of resilience help the medicine go down? , 2013, BMJ quality & safety.

[21]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[22]  Meika Loe,et al.  A sociological approach to ageing, technology and health. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[23]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Understanding repair as a creative process of everyday design , 2011, C&C '11.

[24]  Caleb Johnston,et al.  Sensing the city , 2014 .

[25]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[26]  Uta Brandes,et al.  Design by use : the everyday metamorphosis of things , 2008 .

[27]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Manifestations of everyday design: guiding goals and motivations , 2013, Creativity & Cognition.

[28]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  A sustainable design fiction , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[29]  M. Rosenbaum,et al.  Learned resourcefulness: On coping skills, self-control, and adaptive behavior. , 1990 .

[30]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[31]  Daan van Eijk,et al.  Practices as a unit of design , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[32]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[33]  Chris Speed,et al.  Listening to an everyday kettle: How can the data objects collect be useful for design research? , 2015 .

[34]  Johan Redström,et al.  Materializing infrastructures for participatory hacking , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[35]  Johan Redström,et al.  RE:Definitions of use , 2008 .

[36]  Alex S. Taylor,et al.  Artful systems in the home , 2005, CHI.

[37]  Philip Koopman,et al.  Work-arounds, Make-work, and Kludges , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[38]  Ron Eglash,et al.  Appropriating Technology: Vernacular Science And Social Power , 2004 .

[39]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI , 2015, CHI.

[40]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  The turn to practice in HCI: towards a research agenda , 2014, CHI.

[41]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Meta-design: A Framework for the Future of End-User Development , 2006, End User Development.

[42]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Social Impact , 2019, Encyclopedia of Food and Agricultural Ethics.

[43]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Products and Practices: Selected Concepts from Science and Technology Studies and from Social Theories of Consumption and Practice1 , 2007, Design Issues.

[44]  A. Aoussat,et al.  Design in use : some methodological considerations , 2008 .

[45]  Karl A. Hribernik,et al.  Living labs as a multi-contextual R&D methodology , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[46]  Pieter E. Vermaas,et al.  Use plans and artefact functions: an intentionalist approach to artefacts and their use , 2006 .

[47]  Ron Wakkary,et al.  Unselfconscious Interaction: A Conceptual Construct , 2016, Interact. Comput..

[48]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Some consideration on the (in)effectiveness of residential energy feedback systems , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[49]  E. Giaccardi,et al.  Things as Co-Ethnographers: Implications of a Thing Perspective for Design and Anthropology , 2016, Design Anthropological Futures.

[50]  Ann Blandford,et al.  A resilience markers framework for small teams , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[51]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  BinCam: Designing for Engagement with Facebook for Behavior Change , 2013, INTERACT.

[52]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective , 2008, Digit. Creativity.

[53]  Chris Speed,et al.  New Domestic Locations: Reconfiguring the home through the Internet of Things , 2014 .

[54]  Charles Jencks,et al.  Adhocism: The Case for Improvisation , 1972 .

[55]  Woohun Lee,et al.  Everyday Design as a Design Resource , 2014 .

[56]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Divining a Digital Future - Mess and Mythology in Ubiquitous Computing , 2011 .

[57]  Meika Loe,et al.  Aging Our Way: Lessons for Living from 85 and Beyond , 2011 .

[58]  Eric Paulos,et al.  Second-hand interactions: investigating reacquisition and dispossession practices around domestic objects , 2011, CHI.

[59]  Philippe A. Palanque,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 2014, International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

[60]  Conny Bakker,et al.  Designing change by living change , 2012 .

[61]  S Mitchell,et al.  Objects in flux: the consumer modification of mass-produced goods , 2011 .

[62]  Andrea Botero,et al.  Expanding Design Space : Design-In-Use Activities and Strategies , 2010 .

[63]  Jeannette Pols,et al.  Where is grandma? Home telecare, good aging and the domestication of later life , 2015 .

[64]  Elisa Giaccardi.  Metadesign as an Emergent Design Culture , 2005, Leonardo.

[65]  Meng-Chwan Tan,et al.  Notes on the , 2009 .

[66]  E. Shove,et al.  Debating the future of comfort: environmental sustainability, energy consumption and the indoor environment , 2005 .

[67]  Paul Dourish,et al.  What we talk about when we talk about context , 2004, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[68]  Jakob Tholander,et al.  Towards a new set of ideals: consequences of the practice turn in tangible interaction , 2008, TEI.