Towards a Lean Understanding of Resource Allocation in a Multi-Project Sub-Contracting Environment

For many reasons, subcontracting is prevalent throughout the construction industry. Multiple subcontractors each perform work on multiple projects simultaneously. Each subcontractor strives to win sufficient jobs so as to ensure a ready supply of available work; each project manager strives to control the subcontractors on his/her project to maintain costand schedule-compliance, often pushing them to perform even when conditions preclude efficient or quality work. Construction subcontracting suffers the ills of traditional push workflows, but the problem for individual projects is exacerbated by subcontractors optimizing their workload across multiple projects, creating a snowball effect of growing instability for each individual project. Much of the research and implementation of lean construction has been carried out within the conceptual boundary of a single project or a single value stream. This paper proposes a multi-project, multi-subcontractor approach aimed at developing better understanding of workflow from the subcontractors' point of view, and contributing to development of a multi-project and multi-sub-contracting theory of production in construction projects. It attempts to define the questions, scope and methods for the research. A solution approach using an economic model is proposed. The long-term goal is to enable development of sub-contracting relationships and management procedures that harness the potential for both contractors and sub-contractors to benefit.

[1]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  WORKPLAN: CONSTRAINT-BASED DATABASE FOR WORK PACKAGE SCHEDULING , 1999 .

[2]  Joseph R. Proctor Golden Rule of Contractor-Subcontractor Relations , 1996 .

[3]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  PARADE GAME :I MPACT OF WORK FLOW VARIABILITY ON TRADE PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[4]  William J. O'Brien,et al.  Multi-Project Resource Allocation: Parametric Models and Managerial Implications , 2000 .

[5]  David J. Edwards,et al.  Accident Trends Involving Construction Plant: An Exploratory Analysis , 2003 .

[6]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Application of the New Production Philosophy to Construction , 1992 .

[7]  Anil Sawhney,et al.  Cycle-Time Contributions of Hyper-Specialization and Time-Gating Strategies in Us Residential Construction , 2003 .

[8]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Capacity Utilization and Wait Time: A Primer for Construction , 2001 .

[9]  Martin Fischer,et al.  Importance of Capacity Constraints to Construction Cost and Schedule , 2000 .

[10]  Jimmie Hinze,et al.  The Contractor‐Subcontractor Relationship: The Subcontractor's View , 1994 .

[11]  Gregory A. Howell,et al.  Aligning the Lean Organization: A Contractual Approach , 2003 .

[12]  Ting-Ya Hsieh,et al.  Impact of Subcontracting on Site Productivity: Lessons Learned in Taiwan , 1998 .

[13]  Boyd C. Paulson,et al.  Agent-Based Compensatory Negotiation Methodology to Facilitate Distributed Coordination of Project Schedule Changes , 2003 .

[14]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction , 2000 .