Technological globalisation and innovative centres: the role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy

Abstract This paper examines two related propositions. First, that multinational corporations (MNCs) emanating from the most important locations in their industry are more likely to evolve towards technological strategies of geographically differentiating their innovative activities abroad. Second, that MNCs originating from weaker centres in the same industry tend rather to evolve towards a strategy of replicating in the profile of their technological development abroad the pattern of their home country specialisation. Using data on patents granted in the US to the largest European-owned firms for research carried out in European locations, the results from cluster analysis and from multiple linear regressions give broad support to these propositions.

[1]  B. Kogut,et al.  The Exploration of Technological Diversity and the Geographic Localization of Innovation , 1997 .

[2]  Christopher Freeman,et al.  Technology and the future of Europe : global competition and the environment in the 1990s , 1991 .

[3]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Knowledge sourcing by foreign multinationals: Patent citation analysis in the U.S. semiconductor industry , 1996 .

[4]  Z. Griliches.  Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[5]  D. Archibugi,et al.  Specialization and size of technological activities in industrial countries: The analysis of patent data , 1992 .

[6]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[7]  John H. Dunning,et al.  The Geographical Sources of the Competitiveness of Firms: Some results of a new survey , 1997 .

[8]  D. Archibugi,et al.  The globalisation of technology: a new taxonomy , 1995 .

[9]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[10]  W. Kuemmerle.  The Drivers of Foreign Direct Investment into Research and Development: An Empirical Investigation , 1999 .

[11]  Manuel Trajtenberg,et al.  Geographic Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations , 1993 .

[12]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity , 1989 .

[13]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: a review , 1992 .

[14]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[15]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  An Examination of the Geography of Innovation , 1993 .

[16]  J. Cantwell.  The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? , 1995 .

[17]  Overseas R&D by Multinationals in Foreign Centers of Excellence , 1996 .

[18]  J. Cantwell.  Multinational investment in modern Europe : strategic interaction in the integrated community , 1992 .

[19]  I. Zander.  Technological diversification in the multinational corporation—historical evolution and future prospects , 1997 .

[20]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[21]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE , 1996 .

[22]  Jeremy Howells,et al.  Technological Competitiveness in an International Arena , 1998 .

[23]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[24]  P. Swann,et al.  Do firms in clusters innovate more , 1998 .

[25]  M. Casson.  Global Research Strategy and International Competitiveness , 1992 .

[26]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[27]  Kenneth D. Bailey,et al.  Typologies And Taxonomies , 1994 .

[28]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[29]  Robert Pearce,et al.  Decentralised R&D and strategic competitiveness: globalised approaches to generation and use of technology in multinational enterprises (MNEs) , 1999 .

[30]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  Technology strategy and the firm : management and public policy , 1989 .

[31]  The World's Largest Industrial Enterprises 1962-1983 , 1985 .

[32]  P. Patel,et al.  Localised Production of Technology for Global Markets , 1995 .

[33]  D. North.  Competing Technologies , Increasing Returns , and Lock-In by Historical Events , 1994 .

[34]  M. Aldenderfer.  Cluster Analysis , 1984 .

[35]  Warren S. Sarle,et al.  Cubic Clustering Criterion , 1983 .

[36]  Stephen E. Thomsen.  Multinational enterprises and the global economy , 1994 .

[37]  J. Cantwell,et al.  Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization , 2000 .

[38]  G. Santangelo.  Corporate Technological Specialisation in the European Information and Communications Technology Industry , 1998 .

[39]  M. Aldenderfer,et al.  Cluster Analysis. Sage University Paper Series On Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences 07-044 , 1984 .

[40]  E. Penrose.  The theory of the growth of the firm twenty-five years after , 1960 .

[41]  A. Townsend,et al.  The globalisation of production and technology , 1993 .

[42]  J. Dunning,et al.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: The geographical sourcing of technology-based assets by multinational enterprises , 1999 .

[43]  Bart Verspagen,et al.  A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. , 1991 .

[44]  J. Dunning,et al.  The world's largest industrial enterprises , 1981 .

[45]  B. Everitt,et al.  Cluster Analysis (2nd ed). , 1982 .