The role of attitude objects in attitude functions

Previous approaches to attitude functions have examined personality and situational influences on the multiple functions that can be served by the same attitudes. The present analysis focuses on the role of attitude objects in attitude functions and proposes that attitudes toward some objects tend to serve a single function. Using newly developed measures of attitude functions, Study 1 established that objects that are primarily associated with a single attitude function (utilitarian, social identity, or self-esteem maintenance function) can be identified. In Study 2, such objects served as a basis for directly varying the functions of attitudes, by varying the types of objects that served as experimental stimuli. This study investigated whether attitudes toward objects that engage different functions respond to different types of persuasive appeals. Subjects read appeals (advertisements) containing function-relevant or function-irrelevant information about products assumed primarily to engage either a utilitarian or a social identity function. Function-relevant ads were more persuasive than function-irrelevant ads, consistent with the findings of previous functional approaches. Additional data identified a situational factor, the juxtaposition of appeals, that influenced the magnitude of these effects.

[1]  Koch Sigmund Ed,et al.  Psychology: A Study of A Science , 1962 .

[2]  H. Kelman PROCESSES OF OPINION CHANGE , 1961 .

[3]  Kenneth G. DeBono,et al.  Source expertise, source attractiveness, and the processing of persuasive information: A functional approach. , 1988 .

[4]  Sharon Shavitt,et al.  Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. , 1989 .

[5]  M. Snyder Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[6]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. , 1985 .

[7]  C. McClintock Personality syndromes and attitude change1 , 1958 .

[8]  Chester A. Insko,et al.  Theories of attitude change , 1967 .

[9]  G. Herek Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. , 1987 .

[10]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[11]  D. Katz,et al.  The reduction of prejudice through the arousal of self-insight. , 1959, Journal of personality.

[12]  N. Miller,et al.  Attitude change : a critical analysis of theoretical approaches , 1970 .

[13]  S. Shavitt Functional imperative theory of attitude formation and expression , 1985 .

[14]  Jerome S. Bruner,et al.  Opinions and Personality. , 1956 .

[15]  D. Katz THE FUNCTIONAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF ATTITUDES , 1960 .

[16]  Kenneth G. DeBono Investigating the social-adjustive and value-expressive functions of attitudes: Implications for persuasion processes. , 1987 .

[17]  R. Reeves,et al.  Reality in Advertising , 1961 .

[18]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Attitudes and Attitude Change , 1987 .

[19]  D. Katz,et al.  Ego-Defense and Attitude Change , 1956 .

[20]  H. Kelman Compliance, identification, and internalization three processes of attitude change , 1958 .

[21]  R. Fazio On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. , 1989 .