Laser scanning reveals bryophyte canopy structure.

We evaluated laser scanning as a method to provide depth measurements for bryophyte canopies at fine spatial scales to derive surface roughness (Lr), a structural parameter. Depths to the first vertical canopy contact were measured on 5 x 5 cm2 areas of 27 bryophyte canopies using a contact probe, a commercial laser scanner and a scanner employing a laser diode striper (LED scanner). Laser scanning adequately distinguished structural types, but scanner configuration led to differences in the magnitude of Lr. LED scanning did not damage photosystem II function in three bryophyte species, Bazzania trilobata, Sphagnum girgensohnii and Pleurozium schreberi, as evidenced by no change in the chlorophyll fluorescence parameter FV/FM following LED scanning, but a decrease when subjected to high light. A previously published boundary layer conductance model was parameterized with surface roughness values determined using a laser scanner and compared with the results obtained with contact probe measures. The resulting parameters of the functional models did not differ significantly from each other.

[1]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  Productivity and nutrient cycling in taiga forest ecosystems , 1983 .

[2]  M. Proctor Physiological Ecology: Water Relations, Light and Temperature Responses, Carbon Balance , 1982 .

[3]  L. Norton,et al.  Surface Roughness Changes as Affected by Rainfall Erosivity, Tillage, and Canopy Cover , 1997 .

[4]  B. Crandall-Stotler,et al.  A Checklist of the Liverworts and Hornworts of North America , 1977 .

[5]  E. C. V. D. Hoeven Vertical profiles of biomass,light intercepting area and light intensity in chalk grassland mosses (Papers to commemorate the late Dr. Sinske Hattori′s contributions-1-〔含 肖像〕) , 1993 .

[6]  W. Schofield Ecological Significance of Morphological Characters in the Moss Gametophyte , 1981 .

[7]  W. Oechel,et al.  The Role of Bryophytes in Nutrient Cycling in the Taiga , 1986 .

[8]  Leslie A. Viereck,et al.  Vegetation, soils, and forest productivity in selected forest types in interior Alaska , 1983 .

[9]  S. K. Rice Variation in carbon isotope discrimination within and among Sphagnum species in a temperate wetland , 2000, Oecologia.

[10]  S. K. Rice,et al.  The influence of water content and leaf anatomy on carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis in Sphagnum , 1996 .

[11]  M. Lefsky,et al.  Laser altimeter canopy height profiles: methods and validation for closed-canopy, broadleaf forests , 2001 .

[12]  K Maxwell,et al.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide. , 2000, Journal of experimental botany.

[13]  H. During,et al.  The effect of density on size frequency distributions in chalk grassland bryophyte populations , 1997 .

[14]  J. Titus,et al.  Vertical zonation of Sphagnum mosses along hummock-hollow gradients , 1983 .

[15]  W. Oechel,et al.  COMPARATIVE PATTERNS OF NET PHOTOSYNTHESIS IN AN ASSEMBLAGE OF MOSSES WITH CONTRASTING MICRODISTRIBUTIONS , 1987 .

[16]  P. Crill,et al.  Automated measurements of CO(2) exchange at the moss surface of a black spruce forest. , 1997, Tree physiology.

[17]  E. G. Thwaite,et al.  A noncontact laser system for measuring soil surface topography , 1988 .

[18]  D. Collins,et al.  Functional significance of variation in bryophyte canopy structure. , 2001, American journal of botany.

[19]  J. Briantais,et al.  The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence , 1989 .

[20]  R. S. Clymo,et al.  THE GROWTH OF SPHA GNUM: EXPERIMENTS ON, AND SIMULATION OF, SOME EFFECTS OF LIGHT FLUX AND WATER-TABLE DEPTH , 1983 .

[21]  Chlorophyll fluorescence as an exploratory tool for ecophysiological studies on mosses and other small poikilohydric plants , 1997 .

[22]  R. Hill,et al.  Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data , 2003 .

[23]  P. Schuepp,et al.  On the ecological and evolutionary significance OF BRANCH AND LEAF MORPHOLOGY IN aquatic Sphagnum (Sphagnaceae) , 1995 .

[24]  L. E. Anderson,et al.  List of the Mosses of North America North of Mexico , 1990 .

[25]  C. Gimingham,et al.  Ecological Studies on Growth-Form in Bryophytes: I. Correlations Between Growth-Form and Habitat , 1957 .

[26]  J. Titus,et al.  Carbon Balance for Two Sphagnum Mosses: Water Balance Resolves a Physiological Paradox , 1984 .

[27]  H. Crum Structural Diversity of Bryophytes , 2001 .

[28]  S. K. Rice,et al.  Cushion size, surface roughness, and the control of water balance and carbon flux in the cushion moss Leucobryum glaucum (Leucobryaceae). , 2004, American journal of botany.

[29]  J. Bradford,et al.  Portable laser scanner for measuring soil surface roughness. , 1990 .

[30]  P. Schuepp,et al.  Tansley Review No. 59 Leaf boundary layers. , 1993, The New phytologist.

[31]  J. Tenhunen,et al.  Photoinhibition as a control on photosynthesis and production of Sphagnum mosses , 1993, Oecologia.