A New Method for End-to-End Available Bandwidth Estimation

Previous Probe Gap Model (PGM) based available bandwidth (AB) estimation methods all request the "busy assumption" that probing packet pairs should be in the same busy period when transmitted on bottleneck link, which is hard to satisfy especially for the low utilization path. In this paper, we first present a new probabilistic methodology to estimate AB under "non busy assumption". The methodology is quite accurate on the low utilization network path. Secondly, we propose a metric to weigh the busyness of a network path based on the distribution of output probe gap. Using the metric, we combine our new methodology and previous methodology, and present a new AB estimation method called Adaptive Available Bandwidth Estimation (A_ABE) which is fit for both low utilization and high utilization paths. We use NS-2 simulation and reproduce traffic from real Internet links to evaluate A_ABE. Compared with previous methods, A_ABE shows its advantages in terms of accuracy, overhead, and also the robustness when confronted with non-persistent cross traffic in multiple hop situations.

[1]  Peter Steenkiste,et al.  Evaluation and characterization of available bandwidth probing techniques , 2003, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[2]  Philip A. Chou,et al.  Rate-distortion optimized streaming of packetized media , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[3]  Hari Balakrishnan,et al.  Resilient overlay networks , 2001, SOSP.

[4]  Alok Shriram,et al.  Identifying Bottleneck Links Using Distributed End-to-end Available Bandwidth Measurements , 2003 .

[5]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Multifractal Cross-Traffic Estimation , 2000 .

[6]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  pathChirp: Efficient available bandwidth estimation for network paths , 2003 .

[7]  D. Loguinov,et al.  A Stochastic Foundation of Available Bandwidth Estimation: Multi-Hop Analysis , 2008, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

[8]  M. Frans Kaashoek,et al.  A measurement study of available bandwidth estimation tools , 2003, IMC '03.

[9]  Manish Jain,et al.  End-to-end available bandwidth: measurement methodology, dynamics, and relation with TCP throughput , 2003, TNET.

[10]  Dmitri Loguinov,et al.  Multi-hop probing asymptotics in available bandwidth estimation: stochastic analysis , 2005, IMC '05.

[11]  István Csabai,et al.  Understanding Packet Pair Separation Beyond the Fluid Model: The Key Role of Traffic Granularity , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  K. Claffy,et al.  Trends in wide area IP traffic patterns - A view from Ames Internet Exchange , 2000 .

[13]  Mats Björkman,et al.  A new end-to-end probing and analysis method for estimating bandwidth bottlenecks , 2000, Globecom '00 - IEEE. Global Telecommunications Conference. Conference Record (Cat. No.00CH37137).

[14]  Alok Shriram,et al.  Empirical Evaluation of Techniques for Measuring Available Bandwidth , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[15]  François Baccelli,et al.  Adding definition to active probing , 2007, CCRV.