Statistics of adaptive nulling and use of the generalized eigenrelation (GER) for modeling inhomogeneities in adaptive processing

This paper examines the integrity of the generalized eigenrelation (GER), which is an approach to assessing performance in an adaptive processing context involving covariance estimation when the adaptive processors are subject to undernulled interference. The GER is a mathematical relation, which if satisfied, often facilitates closed-form analysis of adaptive processors employing estimated covariances subject to inhomogeneities. The goal of this paper is to determine what impact this constraint has on the integrity of the adaptive nulling process. In order to examine the impact of the GER constraint on adaptive nulling, we establish fundamental statistical convergence properties of an adaptive null for the sample covariance-based (SCB) minimum variance distortionless response (MVDR) beamformer. Novel exact expressions relating the mean and variance of an adaptive null of a homogeneously trained beamformer to the mean and variance of a nonhomogeneous trained beamformer are derived. In addition, it is shown that the Reed et al. (1974) result for required sample support can be highly inaccurate under nonhomogeneous conditions. Indeed, the required sample support can at times depend directly on the power of the undernulled interference.

[1]  D. Boroson,et al.  Sample Size Considerations for Adaptive Arrays , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[2]  E. J. Kelly Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals , 1989 .

[3]  I. Reed,et al.  Rapid Convergence Rate in Adaptive Arrays , 1974, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[4]  Allan Steinhardt,et al.  Improved adaptive clutter cancellation through data-adaptive training , 1999 .

[5]  Christ D. Richmond,et al.  Performance of a class of adaptive detection algorithms in nonhomogeneous environments , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Christ D. Richmond PDF's, confidence regions, and relevant statistics for a class of sample covariance-based array processors , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[7]  H. Cox Resolving power and sensitivity to mismatch of optimum array processors , 1973 .

[8]  Alvin W. Drake,et al.  Fundamentals of Applied Probability Theory , 1967 .

[9]  Daniel R. Fuhrmann,et al.  A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector , 1992 .

[10]  Karl Gerlach Sidelobe Level of an Adaptive Array Using the SMI (Sampled Matrix Inversion) Algorithm , 1988 .

[11]  H. Cramér Mathematical methods of statistics , 1947 .

[12]  C. Richmond,et al.  Statistical performance analysis of the adaptive sidelobe blanker detection algorithm , 1997, Conference Record of the Thirty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (Cat. No.97CB36136).

[13]  Christ D. Richmond,et al.  Derived PDF of maximum likelihood signal estimator which employs an estimated noise covariance , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[14]  Allan O. Steinhardt The PDF of adaptive beamforming weights , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..