Nonlocal helix formation is key to understanding S-adenosylmethionine-1 riboswitch function.

Riboswitches are noncoding RNAs that regulate gene expression in response to changing concentrations of specific metabolites. Switching activity is affected by the interplay between the aptamer domain and expression platform of the riboswitch. The aptamer domain binds the metabolite, locking the riboswitch in a ligand-bound conformation. In absence of the metabolite, the expression platform forms an alternative secondary structure by sequestering the 3' end of a nonlocal helix called P1. We use all-atom structure-based simulations to characterize the folding, unfolding, and metabolite binding of the aptamer domain of the S-adenosylmethionine-1 (SAM-1) riboswitch. Our results suggest that folding of the nonlocal helix (P1) is rate-limiting in aptamer domain formation. Interestingly, SAM assists folding of the P1 helix by reducing the associated free energy barrier. Because the 3' end of the P1 helix is sequestered by an alternative helix in the absence of metabolites, this observed ligand-control of P1 formation provides a mechanistic explanation of expression platform regulation.

[1]  Kirsten L. Frieda,et al.  Direct Observation of Hierarchical Folding in Single Riboswitch Aptamers , 2008, Science.

[2]  Seema Chauhan,et al.  Tertiary interactions determine the accuracy of RNA folding. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  A. Garcia,et al.  Simulation of the pressure and temperature folding/unfolding equilibrium of a small RNA hairpin. , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[4]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Mechanical unfolding of RNA: from hairpins to structures with internal multiloops. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  R. Montange,et al.  Structure of the S-adenosylmethionine riboswitch regulatory mRNA element , 2006, Nature.

[6]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Theory of protein folding: the energy landscape perspective. , 1997, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[7]  J. Onuchic,et al.  An all‐atom structure‐based potential for proteins: Bridging minimal models with all‐atom empirical forcefields , 2009, Proteins.

[8]  S. Wijmenga,et al.  Ligand-induced folding of the guanine-sensing riboswitch is controlled by a combined predetermined induced fit mechanism. , 2007, RNA.

[9]  R. Breaker Complex Riboswitches , 2008, Science.

[10]  Eric J. Sorin,et al.  Does native state topology determine the RNA folding mechanism? , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  E. Groisman,et al.  The intricate world of riboswitches. , 2007, Current opinion in microbiology.

[12]  Shi-jie Chen RNA folding: conformational statistics, folding kinetics, and ion electrostatics. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.

[13]  Ali Nahvi,et al.  An mRNA structure that controls gene expression by binding S-adenosylmethionine , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[14]  E. Westhof,et al.  Hierarchy and dynamics of RNA folding. , 1997, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[15]  Renate Rieder,et al.  Ligand-induced folding of the thiM TPP riboswitch investigated by a structure-based fluorescence spectroscopic approach , 2007, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  Folding mechanisms of group I ribozymes: role of stability and contact order. , 2001, Biochemical Society transactions.

[17]  Changbong Hyeon,et al.  Pathways and kinetic barriers in mechanical unfolding and refolding of RNA and proteins. , 2006, Structure.

[18]  R. Batey,et al.  Thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of ligand binding to the purine riboswitch aptamer domain. , 2006, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  R. Montange,et al.  Riboswitches: emerging themes in RNA structure and function. , 2008, Annual review of biophysics.