Derivation of motor vehicle tailpipe particle emission factors suitable for modelling urban fleet emissions and air quality assessments

Background, aim and scopeUrban motor vehicle fleets are a major source of particulate matter pollution, especially of ultrafine particles (diameters < 0.1 µm), and exposure to particulate matter has known serious health effects. A considerable body of literature is available on vehicle particle emission factors derived using a wide range of different measurement methods for different particle sizes, conducted in different parts of the world. Therefore, the choice as to which are the most suitable particle emission factors to use in transport modelling and health impact assessments presented as a very difficult task. The aim of this study was to derive a comprehensive set of tailpipe particle emission factors for different vehicle and road type combinations, covering the full size range of particles emitted, which are suitable for modelling urban fleet emissions.Materials and methodsA large body of data available in the international literature on particle emission factors for motor vehicles derived from measurement studies was compiled and subjected to advanced statistical analysis, to determine the most suitable emission factors to use in modelling urban fleet emissions.ResultsThis analysis resulted in the development of five statistical models which explained 86%, 93%, 87%, 65% and 47% of the variation in published emission factors for particle number, particle volume, PM1, PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. A sixth model for total particle mass was proposed but no significant explanatory variables were identified in the analysis. From the outputs of these statistical models, the most suitable particle emission factors were selected. This selection was based on examination of the statistical robustness of the statistical model outputs, including consideration of conservative average particle emission factors with the lowest standard errors, narrowest 95% confidence intervals and largest sample sizes and the explanatory model variables, which were vehicle type (all particle metrics), instrumentation (particle number and PM2.5), road type (PM10) and size range measured and speed limit on the road (particle volume).DiscussionA multiplicity of factors need to be considered in determining emission factors that are suitable for modelling motor vehicle emissions, and this study derived a set of average emission factors suitable for quantifying motor vehicle tailpipe particle emissions in developed countries.ConclusionsThe comprehensive set of tailpipe particle emission factors presented in this study for different vehicle and road type combinations enable the full size range of particles generated by fleets to be quantified, including ultrafine particles (measured in terms of particle number). These emission factors have particular application for regions which may have a lack of funding to undertake measurements, or insufficient measurement data upon which to derive emission factors for their region.Recommendations and perspectivesIn urban areas motor vehicles continue to be a major source of particulate matter pollution and of ultrafine particles. It is critical that in order to manage this major pollution source methods are available to quantify the full size range of particles emitted for transport modelling and health impact assessments.

[1]  Kevin Chandler,et al.  Emissions from Trucks and Buses Powered by Cummins L-10 Natural Gas Engines , 1998 .

[2]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[3]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  New methods of determination of average particle emission factors for two groups of vehicles on a busy road , 2004 .

[4]  David Proffitt,et al.  Tailpipe, resuspended road dust, and brake-wear emission factors from on-road vehicles , 2003 .

[5]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[6]  R. Okamoto,et al.  Emissions of toxic pollutants from compressed natural gas and low sulfur diesel-fueled heavy-duty transit buses tested over multiple driving cycles. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  L. Morawska,et al.  Quantification of particle number emission factors for motor vehicles from on-road measurements. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  H. Scheffé,et al.  The Analysis of Variance , 1960 .

[9]  E. Pucher,et al.  Decadal reductions of traffic emissions on a transit route in Austria – results of the Tauerntunnel experiment 1997 , 2001 .

[10]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF ULTRAFINE PARTICLE FORMATION DURING DIESEL EXHAUST DILUTION , 1999 .

[11]  Steven H. Cadle,et al.  Particulate Emission Rates from In-Use High-Emitting Vehicles Recruited in Orange County, California , 1997 .

[12]  John A. Gillies,et al.  Application of a multi-lag regression approach to determine on-road PM10 and PM2.5 emission rates , 2003 .

[13]  B. Vogel,et al.  Comparison of measured and model-calculated real-world traffic emissions , 2005 .

[14]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  Diesel and CNG Transit Bus Emissions Characterization By Two Chassis Dynamometer Laboratories: Results and Issues , 1999 .

[15]  H. Christopher Frey,et al.  RECOMMENDED STRATEGY FOR ON-BOARD EMISSION DATA ANALYSIS AND COLLECTION FOR THE NEW GENERATION MODEL , 2002 .

[16]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Sources and concentration of nanoparticles (<10 nm diameter) in the urban atmosphere , 2001 .

[17]  Eeva-Liisa Viskari,et al.  Transport and environment,Part I - Road Traffic , 2002 .

[18]  R. Gehrig,et al.  Real-world emission factors of fine and ultrafine aerosol particles for different traffic situations in Switzerland. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  Peter Sturm,et al.  Aerosol and NO x emission factors and submicron particle number size distributions in two road tunnels with different traffic regimes , 2005 .

[20]  D. Lowell,et al.  COMPARISON OF CLEAN DIESEL BUSES TO CNG BUSES , 2003 .

[21]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Measurements of ultrafine particle concentration and size distribution in the urban atmosphere , 1999 .

[22]  Matthias Ketzel,et al.  Particle and trace gas emission factors under urban driving conditions in Copenhagen based on street and roof-level observations , 2003 .

[23]  Dana Lowell,et al.  Performance and Emissions Evaluation of Compressed Natural Gas and Clean Diesel Buses at New York City's Metropolitan Transit Authority , 2003 .

[24]  Zoran Ristovski,et al.  Determination of average emission factors for vehicles on a busy road , 2003 .

[25]  Britt A. Holmén,et al.  Particulate Matter Emissions from Hybrid Diesel-Electric and Conventional Diesel Transit Buses: Fuel and Aftertreatment Effects , 2005 .

[26]  Finn Palmgren,et al.  Experimental studies of ultrafine particles in streets and the relationship to traffic , 2001 .

[27]  Eran Feitelson,et al.  Transport and Environment , 2001 .

[28]  Akula Venkatram,et al.  Using a dispersion model to estimate emission rates of particulate matter from paved roads , 1999 .

[29]  Christoph Hueglin,et al.  Long-term observation of real-world road traffic emission factors on a motorway in Switzerland , 2006 .

[30]  Yifang Zhu,et al.  Predicting particle number concentrations near a highway based on vertical concentration profile , 2005 .

[31]  Christopher A. Laroo,et al.  In-use light-duty gasoline vehicle particulate matter emissions on three driving cycles. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Kerrie Mengersen,et al.  Modality in ambient particle size distributions and its potential as a basis for developing air quality regulation , 2008 .

[33]  N. Clark,et al.  NATURAL GAS AND DIESEL TRANSIT BUS EMISSIONS : REVIEW AND RECENT DATA , 1997 .

[34]  Sumeeta Srinivasan,et al.  Travel demand models in the developing world: correcting for measurement errors , 2010 .

[35]  J Wayne Miller,et al.  Emission rates of particulate matter and elemental and organic carbon from in-use diesel engines. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[36]  Peter Romilly,et al.  SUBSTITUTION OF BUS FOR CAR TRAVEL IN URBAN BRITAIN: AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF BUS AND CAR EXHAUST EMISSION AND OTHER COSTS , 1999 .

[37]  R. Smokers,et al.  A new modelling approach for road traffic emissions : VERSIT+ , 2007 .

[38]  P. Barber,et al.  On-Road Vehicle Particulate Matter and Gaseous Emission Distributions in Las Vegas, Nevada, Compared with Other Areas , 2004, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[39]  Lidia Morawska.  Motor Vehicle Emissions as a Source of Indoor Particles , 2003 .

[40]  A W Gertler,et al.  On-road particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) emissions in the Sepulveda Tunnel, Los Angeles, California. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Estimation of the emission factors of particle number and mass fractions from traffic at a site where mean vehicle speeds vary over short distances , 2006 .

[42]  L Morawska,et al.  A model for determination of motor vehicle emission factors from on-road measurements with a focus on submicrometer particles. , 2001, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  S. G. Fritz,et al.  Exhaust Particulate Matter Emission Factors and Deterioration Rate for In-Use Motor Vehicles , 2003 .

[44]  L. Morawska,et al.  Diesel bus emissions measured in a tunnel study. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[45]  Lidia Morawska,et al.  Submicrometer and Supermicrometer Particles from Diesel Vehicle Emissions , 1998 .

[46]  Dana Lowell,et al.  Performance and Durability Evaluation of Continuously Regenerating Particulate Filters on Diesel Powered Urban Buses at NY City Transit , 2001 .

[47]  Ernest Weingartner,et al.  Separate determination of PM10 emission factors of road traffic for tailpipe emissions and emissions from abrasion and resuspension processes , 2004 .

[48]  Alberto Ayala,et al.  Diesel and CNG Heavy-duty Transit Bus Emissions over Multiple Driving Schedules: Regulated Pollutants and Project Overview , 2002 .

[49]  Ulrich Corsmeier,et al.  Vertical distribution of aerosol particles and NOx close to a motorway , 2005 .

[50]  L Gidhagen,et al.  Model simulations of NOx and ultrafine particles close to a Swedish highway. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  Roberto Bellasio,et al.  Emission inventory for the road transport sector in Sardinia (Italy) , 2007 .

[52]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Simulation of NOx and ultrafine particles in a street canyon in Stockholm, Sweden , 2004 .

[53]  Debbie A. Niemeier,et al.  Evolution of particle number distribution near roadways. Part III: Traffic analysis and on-road size resolved particulate emission factors , 2005 .

[54]  COPERT II Computer Programme to calculate Emissions from Road Transport Methodology and Emission Factors , 1999 .

[55]  John A. Gillies,et al.  Exhaust Particle Size Distribution Measurements at the Tuscarora Mountain Tunnel , 2002 .

[56]  Alan W Gertler,et al.  Real-world particulate matter and gaseous emissions from motor vehicles in a highway tunnel. , 2002, Research report.

[57]  Nigel N. Clark,et al.  A Comparison of Emissions and Fuel Economy from Hybrid-Electric and Conventional-Drive Transit Buses , 2004 .

[58]  Christer Johansson,et al.  Model simulation of ultrafine particles inside a road tunnel , 2003 .