Access to Employment for Adults in Poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara Region

This study extends the spatial mismatch literature by examining access to employment for the low-income population in Erie and Niagara Counties in western New York State. The analysis uses geographical information systems (GIS) to map residence and employment locations and calculate measures of employment and transport access. Throughout the two-county region, two-thirds of adults in poverty live within close proximity to a reasonable number of low-wage jobs. The ratio of the number of jobs accessible within a 30-minute commute by automobile versus public transit varies only slightly across neighbourhoods with high poverty rates. The close proximity of the suburbs to the central city and the network of grid and radial streets connecting the two places make suburban job access reasonable. Thus, despite higher numbers of low-wage jobs in the suburbs, job access in the city is superior to job access in the suburbs due to higher densities of employment opportunities and the existence of developed transport networks. While poverty is highly centralised in the cities of Buffalo and Niagara Falls, the analysis suggests that, based on the spatial distribution of low-wage employment and concentrations of poverty, central-city locations have significant advantages in terms of proximity to jobs. However, Black/African American adults in poverty have poorer access to automobiles than Whites, and, as a result, they may be able to search for jobs only within a smaller area. This study recommends enhancements to public transit in places with large concentrations of low-wage jobs and increased access to reliable automobiles in places with small concentrations of low-wage jobs. Above all, unemployment rates in low-income neighbourhoods suggest a need to enhance programmes to improve job readiness, placement and support services.

[1]  W. G. Hansen.  How Accessibility Shapes Land Use , 1959 .

[2]  J. Kain.  Housing Segregation, Negro Employment, and Metropolitan Decentralization , 1968 .

[3]  The Declining Significance of Race: Blacks and Changing American Institutions , 1978 .

[4]  J. Kasarda.  The implications of contemporary redistribution trends for national urban policy , 1980 .

[5]  Anthony Downs,et al.  Neighborhoods and Urban Development , 1981 .

[6]  Eric Sheppard,et al.  MODELING AND PREDICTING AGGREGATE FLOWS , 1986 .

[7]  Harry J. Holzer,et al.  Search Method Use by Unemployed Youth , 1986, Journal of Labor Economics.

[8]  W. Wilson.  The truly disadvantaged : the inner city, the underclass, and public policy , 1988 .

[9]  Harry J. Holzer,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: What Has the Evidence Shown? , 1991 .

[10]  John F. Kain,et al.  The Spatial Mismatch Hypothesis: Three Decades Later , 1992 .

[11]  D. Massey.  American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[12]  M. Abdel-Ghany,et al.  Racial wage differentials among young adults: Evidence from the 1990s , 1994 .

[13]  Brian D. Taylor,et al.  Spatial Mismatch or Automobile Mismatch? An Examination of Race, Residence and Commuting in US Metropolitan Areas , 1994 .

[14]  G. Pratt,et al.  Gender, Work and Space , 1995 .

[15]  P. Ong,et al.  Work and Car Ownership Among Welfare Recipients , 2022 .

[16]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Work and automobile ownership among welfare recipients , 1996 .

[17]  W. Wilson.  When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor , 1996 .

[18]  Mark Fossett,et al.  What Spatial Mismatch? The Proximity of Blacks to Employment in Boston and Houston , 1996 .

[19]  William Julius Wilson,et al.  When Work Disappears , 1996 .

[20]  A. Pisarski.  Commuting in America II: The Second National Report on Commuting Patterns and Trends , 1996 .

[21]  D. Sawicki,et al.  The Effects of Intermetropolitan Migration on the Labor Force Participation of Disadvantaged Black Men in Atlanta , 1997 .

[22]  P. Muller.  The Suburban Transformation of the Globalizing American City , 1997 .

[23]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  Job Access, Commute and Travel Burden among Welfare Recipients , 1997 .

[24]  P. Jargowsky.  Poverty and place , 1997 .

[25]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  Job accessibility and welfare usage: Evidence from Los Angeles , 1997 .

[26]  K. Chapple,et al.  The Causes of Inner-City Poverty: Eight Hypotheses in Search of Reality , 1999 .

[27]  F. Stetzer,et al.  Removing Transportation Barriers to Employment: Assessing Driver's License and Vehicle Ownership Patterns of Low- Income Populations , 1998 .

[28]  Q. Shen.  Location Characteristics of Inner-City Neighborhoods and Employment Accessibility of Low-Wage Workers , 1998 .

[29]  M. Pugh.  BARRIERS TO WORK: THE SPATIAL DIVIDE BETWEEN JOBS AND WELFARE RECIPIENTS IN METROPOLITAN AREAS , 1998 .

[30]  David L. Sjoquist,et al.  The spatial mismatch hypothesis: A review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform , 1998 .

[31]  B. Katz,et al.  Help Wanted Connecting Inner-City Job Seekers with Suburban Jobs , 1999 .

[32]  Elaine Murakami,et al.  DAILY TRAVEL BY PERSONS WITH LOW INCOME , 1999 .

[33]  M. Stoll,et al.  Spatial Job Search, Spatial Mismatch, and the Employment and Wages of Racial and Ethnic Groups in Los Angeles , 1999 .

[34]  M. Stoll,et al.  Racial Differences in Spatial Job Search Patterns: Exploring the Causes and Consequences* , 2000 .

[35]  Robert Cervero,et al.  Transportation as a Stimulus to Welfare-to-Work: Private Versus Public Mobility , 2000 .

[36]  W. M. Rodgers,et al.  Prosperity For All , 2000 .

[37]  M. Stoll,et al.  Can Boosting Minority Car-Ownership Rates Narrow Inter-Racial Employment Gaps? , 2000 .

[38]  David S. Sawicki,et al.  Developing Transportation Alternatives for Welfare Recipients Moving to Work , 2000 .

[39]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Car Ownership and Welfare-to-Work , 2001 .

[40]  Qing Shen,et al.  A Spatial Analysis of Job Openings and Access in a U.S. Metropolitan Area , 2001 .

[41]  B. Lentnek,et al.  Spatial Mismatch is not Always a Central-city Problem: An Analysis of Commuting Behaviour in Cleveland, Ohio, and its Suburbs , 2001 .

[42]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  Cars, Buses, and Jobs: Welfare Participants and Employment Access in Los Angeles , 2001 .

[43]  Matthew E. Kahn,et al.  Decentralized Employment and the Transformation of the American City , 2001 .

[44]  S Baradaran,et al.  Performance of accessibility measures in Europe , 2001 .

[45]  C Jeskey,et al.  LINKING PEOPLE TO THE WORKPLACE , 2001 .

[46]  W. Frey.  Melting Pot Suburbs: A Census 2000 Study of Suburban Diversity , 2001 .

[47]  S. Danziger,et al.  Proximity and opportunity: How residence and race affect the employment of welfare recipients , 2002 .

[48]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Car Access and Welfare-To-Work , 2002 .

[49]  Devajyoti Deka.  Predicting Commute Time of Non–Workers in the Context of Welfare Reform , 2002 .

[50]  Paul M. Ong,et al.  Los Angeles County CalWORKs Transportation Needs Assessment , 2002 .

[51]  S Berglund.  PATH-BASED ACCESSIBILITY , 2002 .

[52]  B Harris,et al.  ACCESSIBILITY: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS , 2002 .

[53]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  On the Way to Work: Welfare Participants and Barriers to Employment , 2002 .

[54]  Evelyn Blumenberg,et al.  En-gendering Effective Planning: Spatial Mismatch, Low-Income Women, and Transportation Policy , 2003 .

[55]  D. B. Hess,et al.  Measuring the Role of Transportation in Facilitating Welfare-to-Work Transition: Evidence from Three California Counties , 2003 .

[56]  L. Schweitzer,et al.  California Transportation Needs Assessment: The Transportation Barriers and Needs of Welfare Recipients and Low-Wage Workers , 2003 .

[57]  J. Logan.  America's Newcomers. , 2003 .

[58]  R. Alba,et al.  Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration , 2003 .