Subjectively and objectively integrated assessment of the quality indices of the suburban residential environment

The development of suburban residential areas influences the increasingly growing disparities between residential areas of a local municipal network. Real positive indicator values of settlements are usually used by planners to characterise the residential quality of a suburban settlement and to decide on its future development. These values frequently differ from choices made by urban residents on living under conditions of such interpretive suburban residential quality. It is the essence of spontaneous development in suburbs. This article aims to devise an integrated evaluation instrument that combines the objective and subjective evaluation of the quality indices of suburban residential environment. It introduces the following topics: (1) the identification of subjective and objective indices of the suburban residential environment; (2) development of the previous conceptual model of subjectively and objectively integrated quality indices used for the assessment of the suburban residential environment, and (3) comparison of suburban settlements by the existing conditions of the residential quality and the quality of the residential environment expected by potential residents. This piece of work is a part of a wider research.

[1]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Decision making in machine tool selection: An integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods , 2013 .

[2]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The use of AHP and rank correlation methods for determining the significance of the interaction between the elements of a transport system having a strong influence on traffic safety , 2013 .

[3]  R. Gifford Environmental Psychology: Principles and Practice , 1987 .

[4]  Irene van Kamp,et al.  Urban environmental quality and human well-being Towards a conceptual framework and demarcation of concepts; a literature study , 2003 .

[5]  Marija Burinskiene,et al.  Quality factors of the residential environment in urban planning , 2007 .

[6]  D. Felce,et al.  Defining and applying the concept of quality of life. , 1997, Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR.

[7]  Jolanta Tamošaitienė,et al.  COMPLEX ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS USED FOR HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS , 2013 .

[8]  J. Lansing,et al.  Evaluation of Neighborhood Quality , 1969 .

[9]  Jolanta Tamošaitienė,et al.  Complex model for the assessment of the location of high-rise buildings in the city urban structure , 2013 .

[10]  William Fawcett Ma,et al.  Reconciling the architectural preferences of architects and the public: the ordered preference model , 2008 .

[11]  Nevnihal Erdogan,et al.  Comparison of Urban Housing Satisfaction in Modern and Traditional Neighborhoods in Edirne, Turkey , 2007 .

[12]  Kerry Chamberlain,et al.  Value dimensions, cultural differences, and the prediction of perceived quality of life , 1985 .

[13]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[14]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Determining the level of agreement of expert estimates , 2007 .

[15]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multiple criteria assessment of alternatives for built and human environment renovation , 2010 .

[16]  Roger K. Blashfield,et al.  Performance of a composite as a function of the number of judges , 1978 .

[17]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Group decision making under multiple criteria , 1987 .

[18]  Merle L. Bowen,et al.  Meanings of Environmental Terms , 1997 .

[19]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  COMPREHENSIVE QUANTITATIVE EVALUATION OF THE STRATEGIC POTENTIAL OF AN ENTERPRISE , 2012 .

[20]  N. Phelps Suburbs for nations? Some interdisciplinary connections on the suburban economy , 2010 .

[21]  A. Modarres,et al.  The suburban question: Notes for a research program , 2010 .

[22]  L. Steg,et al.  Quality of life in residential environments , 2012 .

[23]  Abdolreza Yazdani-Chamzini,et al.  An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making model for handling equipment selection , 2014 .

[24]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[25]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy and Analytic Network Processes for the Measurement of Intangible Criteria and for Decision-Making , 2016 .

[26]  Juan Ignacio Aragonés,et al.  A THEORETICAL AND METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF RESIDENTIAL SATISFACTION , 1997 .

[27]  S. Low,et al.  The Built Environment and Spatial Form , 1990 .

[28]  Nicholas Helburn,et al.  Geography and the Quality of Life , 1982 .

[29]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods , 2014 .

[30]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment , 2012 .

[31]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Application of a quantitative multiple criteria decision making (MCDM-1) approach to the analysis of investments in construction , 2007 .

[32]  Stephen Platt,et al.  Reconciling the Architectural Preferences of Architects and the Public , 2008 .

[33]  Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani,et al.  New Application of SWARA Method in Prioritizing Sustainability Assessment Indicators of Energy System , 2014 .

[34]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRAS , 2011 .

[35]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being , 1976 .

[36]  Marino Bonaiuto,et al.  Cross-Validation of Abbreviated Perceived Residential Environment Quality (PREQ) and Neighborhood Attachment (NA) Indicators , 2010 .

[37]  Victoria Ateca-Amestoy,et al.  The relevance of social interactions on housing satisfaction , 2008 .

[38]  Askoldas Podviezko,et al.  The Evaluation of Financial Stability and Soundness of Lithuanian Banks , 2013 .

[39]  R. Gastil Social Indicators and Quality of Life. , 1970 .

[40]  Niklaus Kohler,et al.  Conceptualizing the built environment as a social–ecological system , 2008 .

[41]  C. Hwang,et al.  Group Decision Making Under Multiple Criteria: Methods and Applications , 1986 .

[42]  E. Zavadskas,et al.  Theories of investment in property: Use of information, knowledge and intelligent technologies , 2008 .

[43]  Marino Bonaiuto,et al.  Perceived residential environment quality in middle- and low-extension italian cities , 2006 .

[44]  R. Forthofer,et al.  Rank Correlation Methods , 1981 .

[45]  Martin Weale,et al.  On measuring the quality of life , 1992 .

[46]  Robert W. Marans,et al.  Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: the 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators☆ , 2003 .

[47]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  DEPENDENCE OF MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION RESULT ON CHOICE OF PREFERENCE FUNCTIONS AND THEIR PARAMETERS , 2010 .

[48]  Wei-Chih Wang,et al.  Applying the AHP to support the best-value contractor selection-lessons learned from two case studies in Taiwan , 2013 .

[49]  Emma Felton,et al.  Beyond the Inner City: Real and Imagined Places in Creative Place Policy and Practice , 2010, Inf. Soc..

[50]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[51]  Amos Rapoport,et al.  The Mutual Interaction of People and Their Built Environment. , 1976 .

[52]  Variability and the relationship between quality of life and real estate prices in Lithuania , 2007 .

[53]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Application of AHP technique , 2009 .

[54]  C. C. M. Adriaanse,et al.  Measuring residential satisfaction: a residential environmental satisfaction scale (RESS) , 2007 .

[55]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Happiness Research: State and Prospects , 2004 .

[56]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[57]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Complex evaluation of contracts for construction , 2010 .

[58]  Tom Kauko An analysis of housing location attributes in the inner city of Budapest, Hungary, using expert judgements , 2007 .

[59]  Eglė Šiožinytė,et al.  Solving the problems of daylighting and tradition continuity in a reconstructed vernacular building , 2013 .

[60]  Valentinas Podvezko,et al.  Identification and evaluation of the critical success factors for construction projects in Lithuania: AHP approach , 2014 .

[61]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Explaining Differences in Societal Levels of Happiness: Relative Standards, Need Fulfillment, Culture, and Evaluation Theory , 2000 .

[62]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[63]  A. Feinstein,et al.  Quality-of-life measurements: origin and pathogenesis. , 2002, The Yale journal of biology and medicine.

[64]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .