Abnormal Blood Pressure Response and Marked Ischemic ST–segment Depression as PrediQctors of Severe Coronary Artery Disease

The usefulness of an abnormal blood pressure response and a marked ischemic ST–segment depression during exercise testing as predictors of severe coronary artery disease was assessed in 378 consecutive patients who had a maximal symptom–limited exercise test before coronary arteriography. An abnormal blood pressure response occurred in 90 patients. The sensitivity of this response for three–vessel or left main disease was 38.6%, the specificity 87.4% and the predictive value 70%. A marked ischemic ST–segment abnormality (MIST) appeared in 85 patients. The sensitivity ofMIST for three–vessel or left main disease was 38.6%, the specificity 89.8% and the predictive value 74.1%. One hundred thirty–eight patients had either an abnormal blood pressure response or a marked ST–segment change. The sensitivity of either response for three–vessel or left main disease was 56.4%, the specificity 78.6%, and the predictive value 66.7%. Exercise duration and ejection fraction were not significantly different in patients with normal or abnormal blood pressure. We conclude that abnormal blood pressure and marked ischemic ST–segment depression during exercise testing are helpful in identifying a subset of patients with advanced coronary artery disease. The physiologic mechanism for these responses is probably exercise–induced ischemia.

[1]  G. Anderson,et al.  The significance of hypotension developing during treadmill exercise testing. , 1978, American heart journal.

[2]  P. Greenberg,et al.  Significance of changes in R wave amplitude during treadmill stress testing: angiographic correlation. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  A. Susmano,et al.  The "False Negative" Treadmill Exercise Test and Left Ventricular Dysfunction , 1978, Circulation.

[4]  J. W. Jordan,et al.  Incidence and significance of decreases in systolic blood pressure during graded treadmill exercise testing. , 1978, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  R. Bruce,et al.  Variations in and significance of systolic pressure during maximal exercise (treadmill) testing. , 1977, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  A. Selzer,et al.  Treadmill stress tests as indicators of presence and severity of coronary artery disease. , 1976, Annals of internal medicine.

[7]  K. Cohn,et al.  Marked depth of ST-segment depression during treadmill exercise testing; indicator of severe coronary artery disease. , 1976, Chest.

[8]  J. W. Jordan,et al.  Comparative study of exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in normal subjects and patients with documented coronary artery disease. , 1976, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  M. H. Kelemen,et al.  Hypotension Accompanying the Onset of Exertional Angina: A Sign of Severe Compromise of Left Ventricular Blood Supply , 1975, Circulation.

[10]  W. T. Anderson,et al.  Correlation of "critical" left coronary artery lesions with positive submaximal exercise tests in patients with chest pain. , 1975, American heart journal.

[11]  V. Behar,et al.  Graded Exercise Stress Tests in Angiographically Documented Coronary Artery Disease , 1974, Circulation.

[12]  D. Cake,et al.  Exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease. Their relation to angiographic findings. , 1973, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  C. Martin,et al.  Maximal Treadmill Exercise Electrocardiography: Correlations with Coronary Arteriography and Cardiac Hemodynamics , 1972, Circulation.

[14]  R. Bruce,et al.  Exercising Testing in Adult Normal Subjects and Cardiac Patients * , 1963, Pediatrics.

[15]  H. Dodge,et al.  The use of biplane angiocardigraphy for the measurement of left ventricular volume in man. , 1960, American heart journal.