Choice of regularization weight in basis pursuit reflectivity inversion

Seismic inverse problem of estimating P- and S-wave reflectivity from seismic traces has recently been revisited using a basis pursuit denoising inversion (BPI) approach. The BPI uses a wedge dictionary to define model constraints, which has been successful in resolving thin beds. Here we address two fundamental problems associated with BPI, namely, the uniqueness of the estimate and the choice of regularization weight λ to be used in the model norm. We investigated these using very fast simulated re-annealing (VFSR) and gradient projection sparse reconstruction (GPSR) approaches. For a synthetic model with two reflectors separated by one time sample, we are able to demonstrate convergence of VFSR to the true model with different random starting models. Two numerical approaches to estimating the regularization weight were investigated. One uses λ as a hyper-parameter and the other uses this as a temperature-like annealing parameter. In both cases, we were able to obtain λ fairly rapidly. Finally, an analytic formula for λ that is iteration adaptive was also implemented. Successful applications of our approach to synthetic and field data demonstrate validity and robustness.

[1]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Global Optimization Methods in Geophysical Inversion , 1995 .

[2]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Computation of differential seismograms and iteration adaptive regularization in prestack waveform inversion , 2003 .

[3]  Klaus Mosegaard,et al.  A SIMULATED ANNEALING APPROACH TO SEISMIC MODEL OPTIMIZATION WITH SPARSE PRIOR INFORMATION , 1991 .

[4]  D. Schmitt,et al.  Simulated annealing inversion of multimode Rayleigh wave dispersion curves for geological structure , 2002 .

[5]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Nonlinear one-dimensional seismic waveform inversion using simulated annealing , 1991 .

[6]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution , 1997 .

[7]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[8]  Zhou Bing,et al.  Solutions, algorithms and inter-relations for local minimization search geophysical inversion , 2006 .

[9]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Gradient Projection for Sparse Reconstruction: Application to Compressed Sensing and Other Inverse Problems , 2007, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[10]  A. Tarantola Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation , 1984 .

[11]  Aswin C. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2008, Computer Vision, A Reference Guide.

[12]  L. Ingber Very fast simulated re-annealing , 1989 .

[13]  R.G. Baraniuk,et al.  Compressive Sensing [Lecture Notes] , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[14]  T. Rashid Discussions and Conclusion , 2014 .

[15]  John P. Castagna,et al.  Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion : Theory and application , 2008 .

[16]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Seismic sparse-layer reflectivity inversion using basis pursuit decomposition , 2011 .

[17]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  A pre-stack basis pursuit seismic inversion , 2012 .

[18]  Stefano Alliney,et al.  An algorithm for the minimization of mixed l1 and l2 norms with application to Bayesian estimation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[19]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[20]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  Atomic Decomposition by Basis Pursuit , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[21]  S. Ghosh Limitations on impedance inversion of band-limited reflection data , 2000 .

[22]  A. J. Berkhout,et al.  Resolution in seismic trace inversion by parameter estimation , 1985 .

[23]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  Recovery of the acoustic impedance from reflection seismograms , 1983 .