Smartphone Use for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Countries: A Pilot Study Conducted in Madagascar

Background Visual inspection of the cervix after application of 5% acetic acid (VIA) is a screening technique for cervical cancer used widely in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). To improve VIA screening performance, digital images after acid acetic application (D-VIA) are taken. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a smartphone for on- and off-site D-VIA diagnosis. Materials and Methods Women aged 30–65 years, living in the city of Ambanja, Madagascar, were recruited through a cervical cancer screening campaign. Each performed a human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sample as a primary screen. Women testing positive for HPV were referred for VIA followed by D-VIA, cervical biopsy and endocervical curettage according to routine protocol. In addition, the same day, the D-VIA was emailed to a tertiary care center for immediate assessment. Results were scored as either D-VIA normal or D-VIA abnormal, requiring immediate therapy or referral to a tertiary center. Each of the three off-site physicians were blinded to the result reported by the one on-site physician and each gave their individual assessment followed by a consensus diagnosis. Statistical analyses were conducted using STATA software. Results Of the 332 women recruited, 137 (41.2%) were HPV-positive and recalled for VIA triage; compliance with this invitation was 69.3% (n = 95). Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia was detected in 17.7% and 21.7% of digital images by on-site and off-site physicians, respectively. The on-site physician had a sensitivity of 66.7% (95%CI: 30.0–90.3) and a specificity of 85.7% (95%CI: 76.7–91.6); the off-site physician consensus sensitivity was 66.7% (95%CI: 30.0–90.3) with a specificity of 82.3% (95%CI: 72.4–89.1). Conclusion This pilot study supports the use of telemedicine for off-site diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, with diagnostic performance similar to those achieved on-site. Further studies need to determine if smartphones can improve cervical cancer screening efficiency in LMIC.

[1]  Doris Ma Fat,et al.  WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data , 2001 .

[2]  M. Boulvain,et al.  Education efforts may contribute to wider acceptance of human papillomavirus self-sampling , 2015, International journal of women's health.

[3]  R. Anorlu,et al.  Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and vaccines: Knowledge, attitude and perception among female students at the University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria , 2012, Journal of epidemiology and global health.

[4]  R. Sankaranarayanan,et al.  Training for cervical cancer prevention programs in low‐resource settings: Focus on visual inspection with acetic acid and cryotherapy , 2005, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  P. Petignat,et al.  Cervical cancer screening in sub‐Saharan Africa: A randomized trial of VIA versus cytology for triage of HPV‐positive women , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[6]  Liron Pantanowitz,et al.  Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[7]  Sylvia C. Mupepi,et al.  Knowledge, practice, and barriers toward cervical cancer screening in Elmina, Southern Ghana , 2014, International journal of women's health.

[8]  F. Mazengia,et al.  Comprehensive knowledge about cervical cancer is low among women in Northwest Ethiopia , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[9]  M. Huchko,et al.  Changing knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors regarding cervical cancer screening: The effects of an educational intervention in rural Kenya. , 2015, Patient education and counseling.

[10]  A. Nessa,et al.  Visual inspection methods for cervical cancer prevention. , 2012, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[11]  Daniel Myung,et al.  eC3-A Modern Telecommunications Matrix for Cervical Cancer Prevention in Zambia , 2010, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[12]  T. M. Bird,et al.  Telemedical cervical cancer screening to bridge medicaid service care gap for rural women. , 2013, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  S. Franceschi,et al.  Prevalence of human papillomavirus and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in China: A pooled analysis of 17 population‐based studies , 2012, International journal of cancer.

[14]  Marc Arbyn,et al.  Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India , 2008, International journal of cancer.

[15]  D. Ferris,et al.  The Efficacy of Telecolposcopy Compared With Traditional Colposcopy , 2002, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[16]  A Coumbos,et al.  Evaluation of a digital store-and-forward colposcopic system - a pilot study to assess usability for telemedicine , 2005, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[17]  E. Rutebemberwa,et al.  Understanding cervical cancer: an exploration of lay perceptions, beliefs and knowledge about cervical cancer among the Acholi in northern Uganda , 2014, BMC Women's Health.