Nanomedicine for implants: a review of studies and necessary experimental tools.

The response of host organisms (including at the protein and cellular level) to nanomaterials is different than that observed to conventional materials. Nanomaterials are those materials which possess constituents less than 100 nm in at least one direction. This review will first introduce the use of nanomaterials in a variety of implant applications highlighting their promise towards regenerating tissues. Such reviewed studies will emphasize interactions of nanomaterials with various proteins and subsequently cells. Moreover, such advances in the use of nanomaterials as novel implants have been largely, to date, determined by conventional methods. However, the novel structure–property relationships unique for nanosized materials reside at the nanoscale. That is, the novelty of a nanomaterial can only be fully appreciated by characterizing their interactions with biological systems (such as proteins) with nanoscale resolution analytical tools. This characterization of nanomaterials at the nanoscale is critical to understanding and, hence, further promoting increased tissue growth on nanomaterials. For this reason, while more tools are needed for this emerging field, this review will also cover currently available surface characterization techniques that emphasize nanoscale resolution pertinent for characterizing biological interactions with nanomaterials, including attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), colorimetric biological assays, circular dichroism (CD), and atomic force microscopy (AFM). Only through the coordination of nanoscale analytical tools with studies that highlight mechanisms of increased tissue growth on nanomaterials will we be able to design better implant materials.

[1]  Rena Bizios,et al.  Evaluation of cytocompatibility and bending modulus of nanoceramic/polymer composites. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[2]  Peter X Ma,et al.  Structure and properties of nano-hydroxyapatite/polymer composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[3]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Three-dimensional, nano-structured PLGA scaffolds for bladder tissue replacement applications. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[4]  Marcus Textor,et al.  Influence of PEG architecture on protein adsorption and conformation. , 2005, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[5]  T. Webster,et al.  Mimicking the nanofeatures of bone increases bone-forming cell adhesion and proliferation , 2005 .

[6]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced Surface and Mechanical Properties of Nanophase Ceramics to Achieve Orthopaedic/Dental Implant Efficacy , 2000 .

[7]  T. Webster Nanophase ceramics: The future orthopedic and dental implant material , 2001 .

[8]  A. Razatos,et al.  Evaluating protein attraction and adhesion to biomaterials with the atomic force microscope. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[9]  M. Ferrari Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[10]  T. Webster,et al.  Increased Osteoblast Function on Nanofibered Alumina , 2008 .

[11]  Panjian Li,et al.  Biomimetic nano-apatite coating capable of promoting bone ingrowth. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[12]  Jin-Chun Kim,et al.  Synthesis and magnetic properties of nanostructured ?-Ni-Fe alloys , 1999 .

[13]  H. Mirzadeh,et al.  Bulk and surface modification of silicone rubber for biomedical applications , 2002 .

[14]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast functions on nanophase titania dispersed in poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid composites , 2005, Nanotechnology.

[15]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced osteoclast-like cell functions on nanophase ceramics. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[16]  T. Webster,et al.  Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. , 2001, Tissue engineering.

[17]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  A new biotechnology for articular cartilage repair: subchondral implantation of a composite of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite, synthetic polymer (PLA-PEG), and bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[18]  J. B. Wachtman,et al.  Characterization of Materials , 1992 .

[19]  F. Rossi,et al.  Surfaces engineering of polymeric films for biomedical applications , 2003 .

[20]  R. Leblanc,et al.  Scanning electron microscopy studies of protein-functionalized atomic force microscopy cantilever tips. , 1999, Scanning.

[21]  T. Webster,et al.  Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[22]  A. P. Serro,et al.  Hydrophobicity, surface tension, and zeta potential measurements of glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[23]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[24]  T. Webster,et al.  Accelerated chondrocyte functions on NaOH-treated PLGA scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[25]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Polymers with nano-dimensional surface features enhance bladder smooth muscle cell adhesion. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[26]  Riyi Shi,et al.  Decreased functions of astrocytes on carbon nanofiber materials. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[27]  H. Gong,et al.  Fabrication and Characterization of Nano-Hydroxyapatite / Poly (D, L-lactide) Composite Porous Scaffolds for Human Cartilage Tissue Engineering , 2006 .

[28]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Decreased fibroblast cell density on chemically degraded poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid, polyurethane, and polycaprolactone. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[29]  V. Labhasetwar,et al.  Nanosystems in Drug Targeting: Opportunities and Challenges , 2005 .

[30]  A. Benninghoven,et al.  Static time‐of‐flight secondary ion mass spectrometry and x‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy characterization of adsorbed albumin and fibronectin films , 2001 .

[31]  T. Webster,et al.  Increased osteoblast functions among nanophase titania/poly(lactide-co-glycolide) composites of the highest nanometer surface roughness. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  G. Wnek,et al.  Electrospinning of Collagen Type II: A Feasibility Study , 2003 .

[33]  C. M. Agrawal,et al.  Sterilization, toxicity, biocompatibility and clinical applications of polylactic acid/polyglycolic acid copolymers. , 1996, Biomaterials.

[34]  T. Webster,et al.  Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[35]  T. Webster,et al.  Selective bone cell adhesion on formulations containing carbon nanofibers. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[36]  M. Kakihana,et al.  Materials Research Society Symposium - Proceedings , 2000 .

[37]  A. Mochizuki,et al.  Blood compatible aspects of poly(2-methoxyethylacrylate) (PMEA)--relationship between protein adsorption and platelet adhesion on PMEA surface. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[38]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[39]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nano-structured surface features. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[40]  P. Moghe,et al.  PEG-variant biomaterials as selectively adhesive protein templates: model surfaces for controlled cell adhesion and migration. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[41]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanotechnology and biomaterials for orthopedic medical applications. , 2006, Nanomedicine.

[42]  W. Stickle,et al.  Handbook of X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy , 1992 .

[43]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nano-structured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[44]  T. Webster,et al.  Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[45]  J. Lhoest,et al.  Fibronectin adsorption, conformation, and orientation on polystyrene substrates studied by radiolabeling, XPS, and ToF SIMS. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[46]  H. Schift,et al.  Chemical nano-patterning using hot embossing lithography , 2002 .

[47]  B. Ratner,et al.  XPS studies on the organization of adsorbed protein films on fluoropolymers , 1984 .

[48]  Thomas J Webster,et al.  Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. , 2002, Tissue engineering.

[49]  H. J. Griesser,et al.  Interfacial properties and protein resistance of nano-scale polysaccharide coatings , 2002 .