A Content Analysis of Librarianship Research

Objective: To conduct a content analysis of library and information studies (LIS) literature published in 2001 and test the domains developed by Crumley and Koufogiannakis. Methods: A comprehensive list of refereed library and information studies journals was compiled and reviewed independently by two researchers to derive a list of included journals. Articles published in 2001 from included journals were independently assessed for relevancy by two researchers. Researchers separately extracted and checked data from included articles. Results: 217 LIS journals were reviewed and 107 were included; 91 journals provided data. 2664 journal articles were examined, with 807 (30.3%) classified as research. The Top 10 journals for research published in 2001 were: 1) JASIST, 2) Scientometrics, 3) Info Proc & Man; 4) Coll & Res Lib, 5) Tie: J Lib Adm/Bull Med Lib Assn, 7) Libs & Culture, 8) J Doc, 9) Tie: J Info Sci/J Acad Libr. For the period studied, descriptive research (329 out of 807 articles) was published far more frequently than any other type. The domain Information Access & Retrieval had the highest number of research articles (314/807), followed by Collections (193/807), Management (135/807), Education (95/807) and Reference (77/807). Two new possible domains were identified: Library History and Professional Issues. Conclusions: Because 36 articles fell into the domain of Professional Issues, a case can be made to add this domain to Crumley and Koufogiannakis’ taxonomy. Library History was not added as a domain because historical research is not used for evidence-based decision-making. There was no evidence to support keeping the Marketing & Promotion domain. LISA provides the best coverage of the top 10 LIS research journals identified in this study.

[1]  S. Kumpulainen,et al.  Library and Information Science Research in 1975: Content Analysis of the Journal Articles , 1991 .

[2]  Mark D. Winston,et al.  Leadership competencies and the importance of research methods and statistical analysis in decision making and research and publication: A study of citation patterns , 2003 .

[3]  Bluma C. Peritz,et al.  The Methods of Library Science Research: Some Results from a Bibliometric Survey. , 1980 .

[4]  Nancy L. Wilczynski,et al.  PDQ Evidence-Based Principles and Practice , 1999 .

[5]  J. Fleiss.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1974 .

[6]  A. Alemna.  The periodical literature of library and information in Africa , 1996 .

[7]  Mary Sue Stephenson.  The "Canadian Library Journal," 1981-91: An Analysis. , 1993 .

[8]  J Hartley.  Headings in structured abstracts. , 1998, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[9]  Clara M. Chu,et al.  A Survey of the Growth of Canadian Research in Information Science. , 1991 .

[10]  Gavin Hui.  PDQ evidence-based principles and practice , 2002 .

[11]  Mesut Yalvaç,et al.  Problems of Library and Information Science Research in Turkey: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles 1952-1994 , 2000 .

[12]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Users' guides to the medical literature. , 1993, JAMA.

[13]  A. Alemna.  The Periodical Literature of Library and Information in Africa: 1996–2000 , 2001 .

[14]  Douglas W. Cooper.  Library Literature in Mainland China: A Content Analysis , 1987 .

[15]  Richard D. Johnson,et al.  New Horizons for Academic Libraries , 1979 .

[16]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Content Analysis of Research Articles in Library and Information Science. , 1990 .

[17]  Stephen E. Atkins.  Subject Trends in Library and Information Science Research, 1975-1984 , 1988 .

[18]  A. Dimitroff.  Educational services in health sciences libraries: a content analysis of the literature, 1987-1994. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[19]  Iyabo Mabawonku.  Trends in Library and Information Science Research in Africa, 1991 - 2000 , 2001 .

[20]  B. Cronin,et al.  Conceptions of library and information science: historical, empirical, and theoretical perspectives , 1992 .

[21]  J Hartley.  Applying ergonomics to Applied Ergonomics: using structured abstracts. , 1999, Applied ergonomics.

[22]  David F. Kohl,et al.  Ratings of Journals by ARL Library Directors and Deans of Library and Information Science Schools. , 1985 .

[23]  J Hartley,et al.  Clarifying the abstracts of systematic literature reviews. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[24]  E. Crumley,et al.  Developing evidence-based librarianship: practical steps for implementation. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[25]  Ali Uzun.  Library and information science research in developing countries and Eastern European countries: A brief bibliometric perspective , 2002 .

[26]  Zhang Haiqi.  Analysing the Research Articles Published in Three Periodicals of Medical Librarianship. , 1995 .

[27]  Patricia E. Feehan,et al.  Library and Information Science Research: An Analysis of the 1984 Journal Literature. , 1987 .

[28]  J. Eldredge.  Evidence-based librarianship levels of evidence , 2002 .

[29]  Maxine K. Rochester,et al.  Library and Information Science Research in Australia 1985–1994: A Content Analysis of Research Articles in The Australian Library Journal and Australian Academic & Research Libraries , 1995 .

[30]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  V. Cano.  Bibliometric Overview of Library and Information Science Research in Spain , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[32]  Liz Bayley,et al.  The Structured Abstract: An Essential Tool for Researchers , 2003 .

[33]  L. Buttlar.  Analyzing the Library Periodical Literature: Content and Authorship. , 1991 .

[34]  Martyvonne M. Nour,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the research articles published in core library journals of 1980 , 1985 .

[35]  S. Nazim Ali.  Indian Library Practice as Reflected in Library Periodicals , 1986 .

[36]  Haiqi Zhang,et al.  A Bibliometric Study on Articles of Medical Librarianship , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  Andrew Booth,et al.  Evidence-Based Practice for Information Professionals: A Handbook , 2003 .