Determination of an organic crystal structure with the aid of topochemical and related considerations: correlation of the molecular and crystal structures of α-benzylidene-γ-butyrolactone and 2-benzylidenecyclopentanone with their solid state photoreactivity

The crystal structure of α-benzylidene-γ-butyrolactone 2, can be determined with the aid of atom-atom pairwise energy evaluation procedures, because its (previously reported) solid state photoreactivity coupled with topochemical principles, greatly restricts the number of possible orientations of the molecule in the unit cell. Crystals of lactone 2 are monoclinic with space group P21/n and with Z = 4, a = 11.014(2), b = 5.959(1), c = 14.286(5), β = 108.05(2). Refinement on 846 non-zero reflections led to an R (reliability) of 0.046. In contrast, the isoelectronic ketone 2-benzylidenecyclopentanone (3) is photostable, and crystallizes in the same space group with Z = 4, a = 7.466(4), b = 6.821(4), c = 19.005(1), β = 94.14(1). The structure of 3 was solved by direct methods and refined on 1037 non-zero reflections to an R of 0.036. The difference between the two structures can be rationalized in terms of intramolecular conformation and weak C-H. . . O hydrogen bonding. Differences in the solid state photoreactivities of the two compounds can be related to the extent of orbital overlap between ‘potentially reactive’ double bonds on nearest neighbour molecules that are related by inversion. Compound 2 reacts in the solid state topochemically but not topotactically showing directional preference, while 3, which has reduced orbital overlap, is photostable.

[1]  M. Hursthouse,et al.  The solid-state photodimerisation of 2,5-dibenzylidenecyclopentanone (DBCP); a topochemical reaction that yields an amorphous product , 1984 .

[2]  G. Kaupp,et al.  Quantitative Photodimerization of Crystalline α‐Benzylidene‐γ‐butyrolactone , 1982 .

[3]  G. Kaupp,et al.  First Detection of a π‐Coupled 1,5‐Diradical via Cycloaddition , 1981 .

[4]  C. Eckhardt,et al.  Enantiomeric intergrowth in hexahelicenes , 1981 .

[5]  Donald E. Williams,et al.  Nonbonded Potential Function Models for Crystalline Oxohydrocarbons , 1981 .

[6]  John Meurig Thomas,et al.  Structure and dynamics of a new phase of anthracene , 1980 .

[7]  H. Nakanishi,et al.  Engineering organic crystals so as to control the photoreactivity of the reactants and the crystallinity of the products , 1980 .

[8]  J. Adams,et al.  The crystal structure of solution-grown 9,10-diphenylanthracene. A combined computational and X-ray study , 1979 .

[9]  W. Jones,et al.  Novel approach to the determination of the crystal structures of organic molecular crystals: Low temperature form of pyrene. , 1978 .

[10]  Thomas L. Starr,et al.  Calculation of the crystal structures of hydrocarbons by molecular packing analysis , 1977, Comput. Chem..

[11]  John Meurig Thomas.  Topography and topology in solid-state chemistry , 1974, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[12]  Donald E. Williams.  Molecular packing analysis , 1972 .

[13]  D. E. Williams,et al.  Accelerated convergence of crystal-lattice potential sums , 1971 .

[14]  G. Wegner.  Topochemical reactions of monomers with conjugated triple-bonds. IV. Polymerization of bis-(p-toluene sulfonate) of 2.4-hexadiin-1.6-diol†‡ , 1971 .

[15]  P. Main,et al.  The application of phase relationships to complex structures. III. The optimum use of phase relationships , 1971 .

[16]  D. Williams,et al.  A method of calculating molecular crystal structures , 1969 .

[17]  A. Kitaĭgorodskiĭ.  The principle of close packing and the condition of thermodynamic stability of organic crystals , 1965 .

[18]  M. D. Cohen,et al.  383. Topochemistry. Part I. A survey , 1964 .

[19]  L. Birkofer,et al.  Aldehydaddition an Enamine , 1962 .

[20]  L. Birkofer,et al.  γ‐Amino‐dicarbonsäuren aus Enaminen , 1958 .

[21]  E. McGrew.  Presentation of case. , 1955, Journal of the American Medical Association.