Comparison of 5-Year Clinical Results of Descemet and Non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE To compare 5-year clinical results of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) and DSAEK. METHODS A retrospective chart review involving patients with non-Fuchs-type bullous keratoplasty who underwent nDSAEK or DSAEK 5 years before the review was performed on demographics, graft survival rate, endothelial cell density (ECD), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications. RESULTS Fifty eyes (nDSAEK 28, DSAEK 22) were included in this study. Common indications for surgery were bullous keratopathy due to glaucoma, cataract surgeries, or laser iridotomy. The graft survival rates in nDSAEK and DSAEK eyes at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.75 and 0.86, 0.67 and 0.81, and 0.59 and 0.74, respectively. The mean donor ECDs of nDSAEK and DSAEK eyes were 2638 and 2503 cells/mm, respectively; these decreased to 1654 and 1406, 1503 and 1218, and 1108 and 1020 cells/mm at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The mean preoperative BCVAs of nDSAEK and DSAEK eyes were 1.08 and 1.11 LogMAR, respectively; these improved to 0.238 and 0.190, 0.126 and 0.157, and 0.097 and 0.070 LogMAR at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. The most common complication was intraocular pressure elevation. There were no statistically significant differences between nDSAEK and DSAEK in graft survival rates, changes in ECD and BCVA, or the occurrence of postoperative complications, with the exception of the change in ECD at 2 years (1173 and 1193 cells/mm, P = 0.0159). CONCLUSIONS Our 5-year clinical results of nDSAEK and DSAEK did not show significant differences at almost all points.

[1]  S. Yamagami,et al.  Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty for Failed Penetrating Keratoplasty: Influence of the Graft–Host Junction on the Graft Survival Rate , 2018, Cornea.

[2]  Marcus Ang,et al.  Long-term Visual Outcomes Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2017, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  S. Tseng,et al.  Descemet’s Membrane Supports Corneal Endothelial Cell Regeneration in Rabbits , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[4]  Yanwei Kang,et al.  Clinical results of non-Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. , 2017, International journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Mehta,et al.  Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[6]  P. Calhoun,et al.  Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Ten-Year Endothelial Cell Loss Compared with Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[7]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[8]  R. Chuck,et al.  Keratoplasty in the United States: A 10-Year Review from 2005 through 2014. , 2015, Ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Hu,et al.  Change of recipient corneal endothelial cells after non-descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty in a rabbit model. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  C. Rapuano,et al.  Long-term Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty and Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy: Fellow Eye Comparison , 2013, Cornea.

[11]  N. Koizumi,et al.  A Study of Host Corneal Endothelial Cells After Non-Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2013, Cornea.

[12]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United States. , 2013, American journal of ophthalmology.

[13]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Clinical outcomes of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty , 2012, International Ophthalmology.

[14]  Shigeru Kinoshita,et al.  Corneal transplantation , 2012, The Lancet.

[15]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Clinical evaluation of non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) , 2012, Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology.

[16]  S. Chaurasia,et al.  Endothelial keratoplasty without stripping the Descemet's membrane , 2011, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[17]  K. Tsubota,et al.  Results Of Non-descemet's Stripping And Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (nDSAEK) , 2011 .

[18]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Descemet ’ s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty : Safety and Outcomes , 2022 .

[19]  C. Jordan,et al.  Graft rejection episodes after Descemet stripping with endothelial keratoplasty: part two: the statistical analysis of probability and risk factors , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[20]  K. Sugiyama,et al.  Non-Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty for endothelial dysfunction secondary to argon laser iridotomy. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  F. Price,et al.  Endothelial Keratoplasty to Restore Clarity to a Failed Penetrating Graft , 2006, Cornea.