Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation

Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) often focuses on how designers can develop systems that convey a single, specific, clear interpretation of what they are for and how they should be used and experienced. New domains such as domestic and public environments, new influences from the arts and humanities, and new techniques in HCI itself are converging to suggest that multiple, potentially competing interpretations can fruitfully co-exist. In this paper, we lay out the contours of the new space opened by a focus on multiple interpretations, which may more fully address the complexity, dynamics and interplay of user, system, and designer interpretation. We document how design and evaluation strategies shift when we abandon the presumption that a specific, authoritative interpretation of the systems we build is necessary, possible or desirable.

[1]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Traces Embodied Immersive Interaction with Semi-Autonomous Avatars , 2001 .

[2]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  The drift table: designing for ludic engagement , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[3]  Telecommunications Board,et al.  Beyond Productivity: Information Technology, Innovation, and Creativity , 2003 .

[4]  William W. Gaver,et al.  The history tablecloth: illuminating domestic activity , 2006, DIS '06.

[5]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Seamful design: showing the seams in wearable computing , 2003 .

[6]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Evaluating the Double-Deck Desk , 2003, HCI.

[7]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Making space for stories: ambiguity in the design of personal communication systems , 2005, CHI.

[8]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[9]  Steve Benford,et al.  Designing the spectator experience , 2005, CHI.

[10]  Steve Benford,et al.  Where on-line meets on the streets: experiences with mobile mixed reality games , 2003, CHI '03.

[11]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[12]  L. Suchman.  Plans and situated actions , 1987 .

[13]  Geri Gay,et al.  Imprints of place: creative expressions of the museum experience , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  E. Vesterinen,et al.  Affective Computing , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[15]  A.,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[16]  R. Westrum.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems , 1989 .

[17]  T. Landauer,et al.  Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction , 1997 .

[18]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Sense and sensibility: evaluation and interactive art , 2003, CHI '03.

[19]  Kristina Höök,et al.  Social Navigation and Seamful Design (特集 ソーシャルナビゲーション) , 2004 .

[20]  Mario Romero,et al.  A preliminary investigation of Alien Presence , 2005 .

[21]  M. B. Clowes,et al.  Models of the Mind , 1970, Nature.

[22]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[23]  Raymond S. Nickerson,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction: Background and Issues , 1997 .

[24]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals , 2000, CHI.

[25]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[26]  William J. Mitchell,et al.  Beyond Productivity: Information, Technology, Innovation, and Creativity , 2003 .

[27]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[28]  S. M. Hansen.  Where the action is. , 1985, Journal (National Association for Hospital Development (U.S.)).

[29]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[30]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  User Centered System Design , 1986 .

[31]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Office window of the future?: two case studies of an augmented window , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[32]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Reflective HCI: towards a critical technical practice , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[33]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Affect: from information to interaction , 2005, Critical Computing.

[34]  M. Mateas,et al.  Office Plant #1: Intimate Space and Contemplative Entertainment , 2017 .

[35]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[36]  Kristina Höök.  Active co-construction of meaningful experiences: but what is the designer's role? , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[37]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[38]  T. Pinch,et al.  Users as Agents of Technological Change: The Social Construction of the Automobile in the Rural United States , 1996, Technology and Culture.

[39]  Kristina Höök,et al.  eMoto: affectively involving both body and mind , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[40]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[41]  Jeffrey T. Hancock,et al.  Advancing ambiguity , 2006, CHI.

[42]  Nihon Ninchi Kagakukai.  Ninchi kagaku : Cognitive studies : bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society. , 1994 .