An LC method for the simultaneous screening of some common counterfeit and sub-standard antibiotics Validation and uncertainty estimation.

Pharmaceutical counterfeiting is a worldwide public health problem, often under-recognised, especially in developing countries where the percentage of counterfeit and sub-standard medicines is dramatically high. Antibiotics, among the most widespread drugs, have been particularly targeted by counterfeiters. World Health Organization emphasizes the need for development and distribution of screening methods explicitly targeted to counterfeit drugs. In this paper is presented a single method for the simultaneous analysis of some of the most common and counterfeited essential antibiotics: ampicillin, amoxicillin+clavulanic acid, doxycycline, cloxacillin, chloramphenicol. A full validation was performed in terms of linearity, precision, robustness and trueness; an assessment of uncertainty was carried out exploiting these data. A wide linearity range was investigated considering the specific nature of counterfeit and sub-standard drugs, whose content in active substance may be rather far from the declared amount. A large span in robustness parameters was considered and a complete intermediate precision assessment was conducted, envisaging the possibility of transferring the method to quality control laboratories, hopefully in developing countries. Finally, the method was successfully applied to the analysis of antibiotics purchased on the informal market in Chad, among which counterfeit and sub-standard samples were detected.

[1]  S. Mackay,et al.  Development and validation of an improved HPLC method for the control of potentially counterfeit isometamidium products. , 2008, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[2]  F. Xavier Rius,et al.  Estimating uncertainties of analytical results using information from the validation process , 1999 .

[3]  S. Hill,et al.  Matrix of drug quality reports in USAID-assisted countries by the U.S. Pharmacopeia Drug Quality and Information Program. , 2006 .

[4]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies. Part 1 : Description of a laboratory protocol , 2000 .

[5]  D. L. Massart,et al.  Ruggedness tests on the high-performance liquid chromatography assay of the United States Pharmacopeia xxii for tetracycline hydrochloride - a comparison of experimental-designs and statistical interpretations , 1995 .

[6]  L. Valvo,et al.  Development and validation of a reversed-phase LC method for analysing potentially counterfeit antimalarial medicines. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[7]  Zdzisław Chilmonczyk,et al.  1H, 13C, 15N NMR analysis of sildenafil base and citrate (Viagra) in solution, solid state and pharmaceutical dosage forms. , 2005, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[8]  R Hoogerbrugge,et al.  Screening suspected counterfeit Viagra and imitations of Viagra with near-infrared spectroscopy. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[9]  W. Horwitz,et al.  Interlaboratory variability in trace element analysis. , 1985, Analytical chemistry.

[10]  K. Ahmad Antidepressants are sold as antiretrovirals in DR Congo , 2004, The Lancet.

[11]  L. Valvo,et al.  Development and Validation of a Fast Reversed-Phase Ion-Pairing Liquid Chromatographic Method for Simultaneous Determination of Eight Cephalosporin Antibiotics in Pharmaceutical Formulations , 2004 .

[12]  A. Rodomonte,et al.  Uncertainty evaluation in the chloroquine phosphate potentiometric titration: application of three different approaches. , 2006, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[13]  R. Plackett,et al.  THE DESIGN OF OPTIMUM MULTIFACTORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 1946 .

[14]  Paul N Newton,et al.  Counterfeit anti-infective drugs. , 2006, The Lancet. Infectious diseases.

[15]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Operational definitions of uncertainty , 2001 .

[16]  Stephen L. R. Ellison,et al.  The evaluation of measurement uncertainty from method validation studies. Part 2 : The practical application of a laboratory protocol , 2000 .

[17]  F. Xavier Rius,et al.  Estimation of measurement uncertainty by using regression techniques and spiked samples , 2001 .

[18]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Comparison of different approaches to estimate the uncertainty of a liquid chromatographic assay , 2003 .

[19]  J. Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Measurement uncertainty from validation and duplicate analysis results in HPLC analysis of multivitamin preparations and nutrients with different galenic forms. , 2003, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.

[20]  F. Xavier Rius,et al.  Evaluating uncertainty in routine analysis , 1999 .

[21]  Zhuo-rong Li,et al.  Development of a RP-HPLC method for screening potentially counterfeit anti-diabetic drugs. , 2007, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[22]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Comparison of alternative measurement methods , 1999 .

[23]  Johanna Smeyers-Verbeke,et al.  Handbook of Chemometrics and Qualimetrics: Part A , 1997 .

[24]  Vicki J. Barwick,et al.  Measurement uncertainty: Approaches to the evaluation of uncertainties associated with recovery† , 1999 .

[25]  J. Maurin,et al.  The usefulness of simple X-ray powder diffraction analysis for counterfeit control--the Viagra example. , 2007, Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis.