Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation : GATA exeperience

Amaç: Kalıcı pacemakerlar birçok hastalığın tedavisinde hayati öneme sahiptir. Tek odacıklı (özellikle ventriküler) ve çift odacıklı leadlere sahip olmak üzere iki farklı seçenek bu hastalıkların tedavisinde kullanılabilir. Ventriküler pacemakerlar daha ucuzdur, ancak iki odacıklı pacemakerların daha fizyolojik olduğu bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmada hastalarda uzun dönem kardiyovasküler mortaliteyi karşılaştırmayı amaçladık.

[1]  O. Ergene,et al.  Comparison of DDD versus VVIR pacing modes in elderly patients with atrioventricular block. , 2012, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.

[2]  D. J. Ryan,et al.  Carotid sinus syndrome, should we pace? A multicentre, randomised control trial (Safepace 2) , 2009, Heart.

[3]  Claudia Stöllberger,et al.  Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2009, Heart rhythm.

[4]  J. Ornato,et al.  ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2008, Heart rhythm.

[5]  M. Pitt,et al.  The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.

[6]  A. J. Camm,et al.  Single-Chamber Versus Dual-Chamber Pacing for High-Grade Atrioventricular Block , 2005 .

[7]  H. Bonnemeier,et al.  Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity , 2005, Heart.

[8]  L. Goldman,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Dual-Chamber Pacing Compared With Ventricular Pacing for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  G. Lip,et al.  Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[10]  L. Goldman,et al.  Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  G. Lamas,et al.  The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients. , 2000, American heart journal.

[12]  M Gent,et al.  Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes , 2000 .

[13]  L. Thuesen,et al.  Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome , 1997, The Lancet.

[14]  J. Brinker,et al.  Endocardial Pacing Leads: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[15]  A. Bernstein,et al.  Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  L. Rydén,et al.  A Double‐Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[17]  K. Oldroyd,et al.  Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block. , 1991, British heart journal.

[18]  K. Stangl,et al.  [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation]. , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[19]  K. Eagle,et al.  Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  J. Nielsen,et al.  ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014 .

[21]  Manfred Zehender,et al.  Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation. Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. , 2004, European heart journal.

[22]  L. Goldman,et al.  Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.