Long-term follow-up of patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation : GATA exeperience
暂无分享,去创建一个
T. Celik | H. Kabul | Ş. Balta | A. Iyisoy | S. Kılıç | Atilla Yılmaz | H. Aldemir | M. Erdem | Muhammet Olgun | Salih Daşdelen | Esra Göktaş | Okan Dalak | Fatih Keçilioğlu | Fatma Nurefşan Selek | A. Uygun | B. Kurt | Orhan Mert | Sayed Mujtaba Haidari | Hamza Berlik | Ö. Topçu | Israfil Akbay | Enes Gümler | İsmail Karaköse | A. Menteşe | Recep Tayip Icli | Ali Uygun
[1] O. Ergene,et al. Comparison of DDD versus VVIR pacing modes in elderly patients with atrioventricular block. , 2012, Turk Kardiyoloji Dernegi arsivi : Turk Kardiyoloji Derneginin yayin organidir.
[2] D. J. Ryan,et al. Carotid sinus syndrome, should we pace? A multicentre, randomised control trial (Safepace 2) , 2009, Heart.
[3] Claudia Stöllberger,et al. Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2009, Heart rhythm.
[4] J. Ornato,et al. ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities. , 2008, Heart rhythm.
[5] M. Pitt,et al. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of dual-chamber pacemakers compared with single-chamber pacemakers for bradycardia due to atrioventricular block or sick sinus syndrome: systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2005, Health technology assessment.
[6] A. J. Camm,et al. Single-Chamber Versus Dual-Chamber Pacing for High-Grade Atrioventricular Block , 2005 .
[7] H. Bonnemeier,et al. Long term complications in single and dual chamber pacing are influenced by surgical experience and patient morbidity , 2005, Heart.
[8] L. Goldman,et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Dual-Chamber Pacing Compared With Ventricular Pacing for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 2005, Circulation.
[9] G. Lip,et al. Dual chamber versus single chamber ventricular pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome and atrioventricular block. , 2004, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.
[10] L. Goldman,et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus-node dysfunction. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] G. Lamas,et al. The mode selection trial (MOST) in sinus node dysfunction: design, rationale, and baseline characteristics of the first 1000 patients. , 2000, American heart journal.
[12] M Gent,et al. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes , 2000 .
[13] L. Thuesen,et al. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome , 1997, The Lancet.
[14] J. Brinker,et al. Endocardial Pacing Leads: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 1995, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.
[15] A. Bernstein,et al. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[16] L. Rydén,et al. A Double‐Blind Study of Submaximal Exercise Tolerance and Variation in Paced Rate in Atrial Synchronous Compared to Activity Sensor Modulated Ventricular Pacing , 1992, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.
[17] K. Oldroyd,et al. Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block. , 1991, British heart journal.
[18] K. Stangl,et al. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation]. , 1990, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.
[19] K. Eagle,et al. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.
[20] J. Nielsen,et al. ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2014 .
[21] Manfred Zehender,et al. Long-term survival after pacemaker implantation. Prognostic importance of gender and baseline patient characteristics. , 2004, European heart journal.
[22] L. Goldman,et al. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in elderly patients treated with ventricular pacing as compared with dual-chamber pacing. Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly Investigators. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.