The purpose of this paper is to conceptualize the hitherto separate domains of Cyberspace and International Relations into an integrated socio-technical system that we jointly call the cyber International Relations (Cyber-IR) system and to identify and analyze its emergent properties utilizing the methods common to science and engineering systems adapted here for the social sciences. Our work is an exploration in both theory and methodology. This paper (a) identifies the actors and functions in the core systems, Cyberspace, and IR, (b) disambiguates system boundary, (c) creates a design structure matrix (DSM), a matrix of the interdependencies among functions of actors, (d) analyzes DSM qualitatively to show multiple interdependent and heterogeneous Cyber-IR properties, and (e) analyzes quantitatively the differential importance of core functions as well as the impact of actor attributes on influence in Cyber-IR. This work forms a baseline for further understanding of the nature of the heterogeneous influences of the various actors and the various outcomes that could result from it.
[1]
Robert Carver North.
War, Peace, Survival: Global Politics And Conceptual Synthesis
,
1990
.
[2]
David Clark,et al.
Cyberspace and International Relations Toward an Integrated System
,
2011
.
[3]
J. Abbate,et al.
Inventing the Internet
,
1999
.
[4]
Johan Eriksson,et al.
The Information Revolution, Security, and International Relations: (IR)relevant Theory?
,
2006
.
[5]
D. V. Steward.
Systems Analysis and Management: Structure, Strategy and Design
,
1981
.
[6]
Chintan Vaishnav,et al.
The end of core : should disruptive innovation in telecommunication invoke discontinuous regulation?
,
2010
.
[7]
Tyson R. Browning,et al.
Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications
,
2012
.
[8]
Karl T. Ulrich,et al.
Product Design and Development
,
1995
.
[9]
C. A. W. Manning,et al.
Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis
,
1960
.