Three-Dimensional Integration: A Tutorial for Designers

There is a perception that classical semiconductor scaling is undergoing saturation and has recently not been delivering on the historical expectations for cost, power, and performance scaling. Both the cost of technology node development and the cost to manufacture the newer nodes have been escalating, as has the nonrecurring engineering charge for new designs in these newer nodes. This has serious implications for our industry's ability to sustain the proliferation of increasingly complex systems at affordable prices and the consequent societal impacts. Thus, the industry has been examining a variety of innovations that scale the package and the board, which have traditionally not scaled to the same extent that silicon has. While silicon has scaled by a factor of 1,000× over the last 45 years, the bump pitch to packages and the trace pitch and ball-grid array pitches on printed circuit boards have scaled by less than a factor of 4× over the same interval, as shown in Figure 1. We are also coming to realize that integrating diverse technologies on a single chip has made technologies far more complex than they need be and to wonder if we could de-integrate technology components, such as memory and logic or analog and logic, and somehow reintegrate them at the system level without loss of latency and bandwidth. In fact, approaches where we optimize technologies for function rather than use general-purpose technologies promise to be lower in cost and achieve better power performance.

[1]  Joel Silberman,et al.  A shorted global clock design for multi-GHz 3D stacked chips , 2012, 2012 Symposium on VLSI Circuits (VLSIC).

[2]  Jaejin Lee,et al.  25.2 A 1.2V 8Gb 8-channel 128GB/s high-bandwidth memory (HBM) stacked DRAM with effective microbump I/O test methods using 29nm process and TSV , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers (ISSCC).

[3]  Subramanian S. Iyer,et al.  3D integration review , 2011, Science China Information Sciences.

[4]  Hiroshi Takahashi,et al.  A 1/4-inch 8Mpixel back-illuminated stacked CMOS image sensor , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference Digest of Technical Papers.

[5]  Subramanian S. Iyer,et al.  Three-dimensional integration: An industry perspective , 2015 .

[6]  S. S. Iyer The evolution of dense embedded memory in high performance logic technologies , 2012, 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting.

[7]  Matthew M. Ziegler,et al.  4.1 22nm Next-generation IBM System z microprocessor , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers.

[8]  So-Ra Kim,et al.  8Gb 3D DDR3 DRAM using through-silicon-via technology , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - Digest of Technical Papers.

[9]  Dongho Lee,et al.  17.4 A 14nm 1.1Mb embedded DRAM macro with 1ns access , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC) Digest of Technical Papers.

[10]  A. Yoshida,et al.  A study on package stacking process for package-on-package (PoP) , 2006, 56th Electronic Components and Technology Conference 2006.

[11]  J. Jeddeloh,et al.  Hybrid memory cube new DRAM architecture increases density and performance , 2012, 2012 Symposium on VLSI Technology (VLSIT).

[12]  X. Gu,et al.  A 300-mm wafer-level three-dimensional integration scheme using tungsten through-silicon via and hybrid Cu-adhesive bonding , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[13]  J. Safran,et al.  Through silicon via (TSV) effects on devices in close proximity - the role of mobile ion penetration - characterization and mitigation , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.