Effects of virtual rehabilitation versus conventional physical therapy on postural control, gait, and cognition of patients with Parkinson’s disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled feasibility trial

BackgroundThere is an association among postural instability, gait dysfunction, and cognitive impairment in subjects with Parkinson’s disease (PD). Difficulty in dividing attention, response inhibition, and visuospatial attention deficiencies may contribute to the impairment of motor performance during daily activities. There are strong evidences that physical therapy can prevent physical and cognitive decline in individuals with PD. Recently, the European Physiotherapy Guideline (EPG) was developed based on randomized clinical trials about the effectiveness of the physical therapy to improve the functional deficiencies of individuals with PD. The EPG did not include the use of promising new intervention as virtual reality in PD due the lack of studies about its safety, feasibility and effectiveness. Therefore, this study protocol had as objective to evaluate the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of a physical therapy program-based on the European Physiotherapy Guideline (EPG) compared to Kinect-based training on postural control, gait, cognition, and quality of life (QoL) of Individuals with PD. Methods/designA single-blind, parallel, randomized, controlled feasibility trial will be conducted with a sample of 32 individuals diagnosed with idiopathic PD. Participants will be allocated into control group (CG) and experimental group (EG). The intervention of the CG will be conventional physical therapy, and the intervention of the EG will be a supervised practice of five Kinect games. Both groups will perform 14 sessions of 1 h each one, twice a week over 7 weeks. Process outcomes will be safety, feasibility, adherence, and acceptability. Safety will be assessed by the proportion of participants who experienced intervention-related adverse events or any serious adverse event during the study period. Feasibility will be assessed through the scores of the games recorded in all training sessions. Adherence will be assessed through the participant’s attendance. Acceptability will be the motivation of the participants regarding the interventions. Clinical outcomes will be (1) postural control, (2) cognitive function, (3) balance, (4) gait, and (5) QoL. Individuals will be assessed pre- and post-interventions and after 30 days by a blinded evaluator.DiscussionThis protocol will clarify if an intervention based on Kinect games will be feasible, safe, and acceptable for individuals with PD compared to conventional physical therapy. We will verify whether the proposed interventions can improve clinical outcomes as postural control, gait, cognition, and QoL of individuals with PD. Our hypothesis is that both Kinect games and conventional physical therapy will be feasible, safe, and acceptable for individuals with PD and will promote positive clinical effects. The results of this feasibility study will be used to design a future definitive clinical trial.Trial registrationUnique identification number in WHO Trial Registration: U1111-1171-0371. Brazilian Clinical Trial Registration Number RBR-27kqv5, registration date: February, 2016.

[1]  G. Borg,et al.  The reliability and validity of a physical work test. , 1962, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  S. Gilman,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for Parkinson disease. , 1999, Archives of neurology.

[3]  F. Horak,et al.  Objective Gait and Balance Impairments Relate to Balance Confidence and Perceived Mobility in People With Parkinson Disease , 2016, Physical Therapy.

[4]  Tatiana de Paula Oliveira,et al.  Motor learning, retention and transfer after virtual-reality-based training in Parkinson's disease--effect of motor and cognitive demands of games: a longitudinal, controlled clinical study. , 2012, Physiotherapy.

[5]  P. Olivier,et al.  Retraining function in people with Parkinson’s disease using the Microsoft kinect: game design and pilot testing , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[6]  Kp Suresh An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research , 2011, Journal of human reproductive sciences.

[7]  L. Clare,et al.  Executive functions in Parkinson's disease: Systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[8]  A. Eakman,et al.  Assessing the Validity of the Dynamic Gait Index in a Balance Disorders Clinic: An Application of Rasch Analysis , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[9]  V. Dourado,et al.  Usual gait speed assessment in middle-aged and elderly Brazilian subjects. , 2011, Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (Sao Carlos (Sao Paulo, Brazil)).

[10]  C. Sampaio,et al.  International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence‐based medicine review: Update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease , 2018, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[11]  M. Leinonen,et al.  Preclinical and clinical assessment of inhaled levodopa for OFF episodes in Parkinson’s disease , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[12]  Catherine Sackley,et al.  Physiotherapy intervention in Parkinson’s disease: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2012, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[13]  S. McEwen,et al.  Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson's disease , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[14]  Isabel Santana,et al.  Validation studies of the Portuguese experimental version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): confirmatory factor analysis , 2010, Journal of Neurology.

[15]  W. Poewe,et al.  Movement Disorder Society Task Force report on the Hoehn and Yahr staging scale: Status and recommendations The Movement Disorder Society Task Force on rating scales for Parkinson's disease , 2004, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[16]  J E Deutsch,et al.  Feasibility, safety and outcomes of playing Kinect Adventures!™ for people with Parkinson's disease: a pilot study. , 2014, Physiotherapy.

[17]  Rebecca Stowe,et al.  Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease. , 2012, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  D. Wrisley,et al.  Reliability, internal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the functional gait assessment. , 2004, Physical therapy.

[19]  Christianna S. Williams,et al.  Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home. , 1997, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Allison Williams,et al.  Effectiveness of multidisciplinary interventions to improve the quality of life for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. , 2014, International journal of nursing studies.

[21]  D. Corcos,et al.  Effects of Endurance Exercise Training on The Motor and Non-Motor Features of Parkinson's Disease: A Review. , 2015, Journal of Parkinson's disease.

[22]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson’s disease: the RESCUE trial , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[23]  Antonio Nardone,et al.  Using psychometric techniques to improve the Balance Evaluation Systems Test: the mini-BESTest. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[24]  M. Campbell,et al.  What is a pilot or feasibility study? A review of current practice and editorial policy , 2010, BMC medical research methodology.

[25]  Paulo Caramelli,et al.  Sugestões para o uso do mini-exame do estado mental no Brasil , 2003 .

[26]  Gammon M Earhart,et al.  Five times sit-to-stand test performance in Parkinson's disease. , 2011, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  W. Poewe,et al.  The Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the non‐motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[28]  B. Bloem,et al.  Evidence‐based analysis of physical therapy in Parkinson's disease with recommendations for practice and research , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[29]  Regina Katzenschlager,et al.  The Movement Disorder Society Evidence‐Based Medicine Review Update: Treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[30]  P. Martínez-Martín,et al.  Independent validation of SCOPA–psychosocial and metric properties of the PDQ‐39 Brazilian version , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[31]  José Eduardo Pompeu,et al.  Pacientes com a Doença de Parkinson são capazes de melhorar seu desempenho em tarefas virtuais do Xbox Kinect®: "uma série de casos" Parkinson's disease patients are able to improve their performance in Xbox Kinect´®s virtual tasks: "a series of cases" , 2015 .

[32]  Adrian H. Taylor,et al.  The effectiveness of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2008, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[33]  Tatiana de Paula Oliveira,et al.  Effect of Nintendo Wii™-based motor and cognitive training on activities of daily living in patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised clinical trial. , 2012, Physiotherapy.

[34]  Rebecca Stowe,et al.  Physiotherapy versus placebo or no intervention in Parkinson's disease. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[35]  Patrick F. Sullivan,et al.  Quantifying prion disease penetrance using large population control cohorts , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.