A new method for VoIP quality of service control use combined adaptive sender rate and priority marking

Quality of service (QoS) control is an important issue in voice over IP (VoIP) applications because of the need to meet technical and commercial requirements. The main objective of this paper is to propose a new QoS control scheme that combines the strengths of adaptive rate and speech priority marking QoS control techniques to provide a superior QoS control performance, in terms of perceived speech quality. A second objective is to propose the use of an objective measure of perceived speech quality (i.e. objective MOS score) for adaptive control of sender behaviour as this provides a direct link to user-perceived speech quality, unlike individual network impairment parameters (e.g. packet loss and/or delay). Our results show that the new combined QoS control method achieved the best performance under different network congestion conditions compared to separate adaptive sender rate or packet priority marking method. Our results also show that the use of an objective MOS as the control parameter for the sender rate adaptation improves the overall perceived speech quality. The results reported here are based on a simulation platform that integrates DiffServ enabled NS-2 network simulator, a real speech codec (AMR codec) and the ITU-T standard speech quality evaluation tool (PESQ).

[1]  J. de Martin Source-driven packet marking for speech transmission over differentiated-services networks , 2001, 2001 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Proceedings (Cat. No.01CH37221).

[2]  Giovanni Schembra,et al.  TCP-friendly transmission of voice over IP , 2003, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[3]  Claudio Casetti,et al.  A simulation study of adaptive voice communications on IP networks , 2001, Comput. Commun..

[4]  Zheng Wang,et al.  An Architecture for Differentiated Services , 1998, RFC.

[5]  Adrian E. Conway A passive method for monitoring voice-over-IP call quality with ITU-T objective speech quality measurement methods , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Proceedings. ICC 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37333).

[6]  Digital Cellular Telecommunications System (phase 2+); Adaptive Multi-rate (amr) Speech Transcoding (gsm 06.90 Version 7.2.1 Release 1998) Global System for Mobile Communications , .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  RAP: An end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the Internet , 1999, IEEE INFOCOM '99. Conference on Computer Communications. Proceedings. Eighteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. The Future is Now (Cat. No.99CH36320).

[8]  Van Jacobson,et al.  A Two-bit Differentiated Services Architecture for the Internet , 1999, RFC.

[9]  David L. Black,et al.  An Architecture for Differentiated Service , 1998 .

[10]  Henning Schulzrinne,et al.  RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications , 1996, RFC.

[11]  N. T. Le,et al.  Selective Packet Prioritization for Wireless Voice over IP , 2001 .

[12]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Prediction of perceived conversational speech quality and effects of playout buffer algorithms , 2003, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2003. ICC '03..

[13]  Lingfen Sun,et al.  Impact of Packet Loss Location on Perceived Speech Quality , 2001 .