Testing Effect: A Further Examination of Open-Book and Closed-Book Test Formats.

If assessment is the purpose of testing, open-book tests may defeat the purpose. However, a goal of education is to build knowledge, and based on the literature, open-book tests may not be inferior to closed-book tests in promoting long-term retention of information. Participants studied Swahili-English pairs and either re-studied or took an initial quiz, which was cued recall or recognition in an open-book or closed-book format. One week later, the final closed-book recognition test showed higher performance in the quizzed conditions than in the study-twice condition, replicating the testing effect. However, performance was similar across the quizzed conditions, indicating that testing promoted long-term retention regardless of test format (open-book versus closed-book) and test type (cued recall versus recognition). Open-book tests are not inferior to closed-book tests in building knowledge and can be particularly useful in online classes because preventing cheating is difficult when closed-book tests are administered online.

[1]  Barbara Christe.  Designing Online Courses To Discourage Dishonesty. , 2003 .

[2]  J. Metcalfe,et al.  Delayed versus immediate feedback in children’s and adults’ vocabulary learning , 2009, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Peter Ayton,et al.  How Real is Overconfidence , 1997 .

[4]  F. Craik.  Levels of processing: Past, present... and future? , 2002, Memory.

[5]  Timothy C. Rickard,et al.  Transfer of Test-Enhanced Learning: Meta-Analytic Review and Synthesis , 2018, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation , 1992 .

[7]  Agr McClelland,et al.  LEVELS OF PROCESSING , 1980 .

[8]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Examining the Testing Effect with Open-and Closed-book Tests , 2022 .

[9]  Christopher A. Rowland.  The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: a meta-analytic review of the testing effect. , 2014, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  R. Bjork.  Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. , 1994 .

[11]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. , 1999 .

[12]  F. Craik,et al.  Depth of processing and the retention of words , 1975 .

[13]  Timothy B. Michael,et al.  Student Equity: Discouraging Cheating in Online Courses. , 2013 .

[14]  William E. Hockley,et al.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Afshin Gharib,et al.  Cheat Sheet or Open-Book? A Comparison of the Effects of Exam Types on Performance, Retention, and Anxiety ∗ , 2012 .

[16]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[17]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Norms of paired-associate recall during multitrial learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. , 1994, Memory.

[18]  N. Rowe.  Cheating in Online Student Assessment: Beyond Plagiarism , 2004 .

[19]  Olusola O. Adesope,et al.  Rethinking the Use of Tests: A Meta-Analysis of Practice Testing , 2017 .

[20]  Steven J. Durning,et al.  Comparing Open-Book and Closed-Book Examinations: A Systematic Review , 2016, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[21]  Randy Moore,et al.  Do Open-Book Exams Impede Long-Term Learning in Introductory Biology Courses? , 2007 .

[22]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  The Power of Testing Memory Basic Research and Implications for Educational Practice , 2006 .

[23]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. , 1957 .

[24]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Test-Enhanced Learning , 2006, Psychological science.

[25]  Joe Kerkvliet,et al.  Academic Honesty and Online Courses , 2006 .

[26]  D. Westerman.  The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  B. Sparrow,et al.  Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips , 2011, Science.

[28]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  When additional multiple‐choice lures aid versus hinder later memory , 2006 .

[29]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing , 1977 .

[30]  A. John Bailer,et al.  Examining the Effect of Proctoring on Online Test Scores. , 2017 .

[31]  Henry L. Roediger,et al.  Expectancy of an open-book test decreases performance on a delayed closed-book test , 2011, Memory.

[32]  J. D. Pauker.  Effect of Open Book Examinations on Test Performance in an Undergraduate Child Psychology Course , 1974 .

[33]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[34]  H. Pashler,et al.  When does feedback facilitate learning of words? , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.