New Global Learning Cultures: Interdisciplinarity through networked technologies

The context in which higher education institutions (HEIs) now operate is facing fundamental changes; HEIs are often said to be in a time of crisis, and new models of education are being explored both within and outside the academy. The rise of open educational resources and practices and alternative forms of accreditation are gaining recognition as learners and educators explore new ways of learning and connecting both within and outside the institution. Simultaneous to this rise in new learning cultures and paradigms, traditional disciplinary boundaries are themselves being challenged as networked technologies and changing social/cultural conditions are leading to further critique of traditional pedagogies, and increasing support for interdisciplinarity. In this paper, we explore emerging and converging technologies and disciplines through two higher education international collaboration scenarios. These two projects illustrate the potential of interdisciplinary communities of practice to nurture and support new pedagogical paradigms. We conclude by identifying five design principles for global interdisciplinary projects.

[1]  F. Baum,et al.  Participatory action research , 2006, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[2]  Roger Bateman,et al.  MLearning 2.0 : fostering international collaboration , 2011 .

[3]  Thomas Cochrane An mLearning Journey: Mobile Web 2.0 Critical Success Factors , 2012, Int. J. Handheld Comput. Res..

[4]  Joanna Saad-Sulonen,et al.  Digital Habitats - stewarding technology for communities , 2013, J. Community Informatics.

[5]  S. de Bruin,et al.  Using mobile technology to enhance students' educational experiences , 2005 .

[6]  Peter Lonsdale,et al.  MOBIlearn WP 4 - PEDAGOGICAL METHODOLOGIES AND PARADIGMS (UON, UOB, OU) Guidelines for learning/teaching/tutoring in a mobile environment , 2005 .

[7]  Roger Bateman,et al.  Mlearning 2.0: The potential and challenges of collaborative mobile learning in participatory curriculum development in higher education. , 2012 .

[8]  Agnes Kukulska-Hulme,et al.  Mobile learning as a catalyst for change , 2010 .

[9]  Morgan Ericsson,et al.  A Survey of Research Methods and Purposes in Mobile Learning , 2011, Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn..

[10]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[11]  K. Senturia,et al.  Participatory Action Research in Practice , 2005, Journal of interpersonal violence.

[12]  Frances Bell,et al.  YouTube as a repository: the creative practice of students as producers of Open Educational Resources , 2011 .

[13]  Wing Lam,et al.  Web 2.0‐based E‐learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching , 2011 .

[14]  T. Cochrane Exploring mobile learning success factors , 2010 .

[15]  T. Cain The Sage handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice , 2014 .

[16]  Roger Bateman,et al.  Strategies for mLearning integration: Evaluating a case study of staging and scaffolding mLearning integration across a three-year Bachelor's degree , 2011 .

[17]  Hanifa Shah,et al.  Mobile Learning in Higher Education: Adoption and Discussion Criteria , 2009 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[19]  Peter Lonsdale,et al.  WP 4 - GUIDELINES FOR LEARNING/TEACHING/TUTORING IN A MOBILE ENVIRONMENT , 2003 .

[20]  Chris Kenyon,et al.  From andragogy to heutagogy , 2000 .

[21]  Andrew Whitworth,et al.  Learner-Generated Contexts: A Framework to Support the Effective Use of Technology for Learning , 2011, SocInfo 2011.

[22]  Helen Keegan Immersed in the Digital: Networked Creativity through Mobile Video Production , 2010 .

[23]  Anne Balsamo,et al.  Designing Culture: The Technological Imagination at Work , 2011 .

[24]  E. Wenger Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .