Value of information in multiple criteria decision making: an application to forest conservation

Developing environmental conservation plans involves assessing trade-offs between the benefits and costs of conservation. The benefits of conservation can be established with ecological inventories or estimated based on previously collected information. Conducting ecological inventories can be costly, and the additional information may not justify these costs. To clarify the value of these inventories, we investigate the multiple criteria value of information associated with the acquisition of improved ecological data. This information can be useful when informing the decision maker to acquire better information. We extend the concept of the value of information to a multiple criteria perspective. We consider value of information for both monetary and biodiversity criteria and do not assume any fixed budget limits. Two illustrative cases are used describe this method of evaluating the multiple criteria value of information. In the first case, we numerically evaluate the multiple criteria value of information for a single forest stand. In the second case, we present a forest planning case with four stands that describes the complex interactions between the decision maker’s preference information and the potential inventory options available. These example cases highlight the importance of examining the trade-offs when making conservation decisions. We provide a definition for the multiple criteria value of information and demonstrate the potential application when conservation issues conflict with monetary issues.

[1]  Alex Imas,et al.  Experimental methods: Eliciting risk preferences , 2013 .

[2]  Artti Juutinen,et al.  Does a voluntary conservation program result in a representative protected area network?: The case of Finnish privately owned forests , 2009 .

[3]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  The Value of Information in Spatial Decision Making , 2010 .

[4]  Joseph R. Bennett,et al.  When to monitor and when to act: Value of information theory for multiple management units and limited budgets , 2018 .

[5]  K. Eyvindson,et al.  Determining the appropriate timing of the next forest inventory: incorporating forest owner risk preferences and the uncertainty of forest data quality , 2017, Annals of Forest Science.

[6]  Michael E. Ketzenberg,et al.  A framework for the value of information in inventory replenishment , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Integrating risk preferences in forest harvest scheduling , 2015, Annals of Forest Science.

[8]  A. Juutinen,et al.  Testing alternative indicators for biodiversity conservation in old-growth boreal forests: ecology and economics , 2004 .

[9]  Kaisa Miettinen,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective optimization , 1998, International series in operations research and management science.

[10]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys , 2005 .

[11]  M. Fortin,et al.  EDITOR'S CHOICE: Stepping stones are crucial for species' long‐distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks , 2014 .

[12]  Gurutzeta Guillera-Arroita,et al.  When do we need more data? A primer on calculating the value of information for applied ecologists , 2015 .

[13]  Alexander Moffett,et al.  Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: a minireview with recommendations , 2006 .

[14]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[15]  Mengchen Liu,et al.  A survey on information visualization: recent advances and challenges , 2014, The Visual Computer.

[16]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Applied Statistical Decision Theory. , 1961 .

[17]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[18]  John R. Birge,et al.  Introduction to Stochastic Programming , 1997 .

[19]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  Value of Information in the Earth Sciences: Integrating Spatial Modeling and Decision Analysis , 2016 .

[20]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[21]  L. Fahrig.  Ecological Responses to Habitat Fragmentation Per Se , 2017 .

[22]  Harold E. Burkhart,et al.  Allocating inventory resources for multiple-use planning , 1978 .

[23]  Annika Susanna Kangas,et al.  Value of forest information , 2010, European Journal of Forest Research.

[24]  Dmitry Podkopaev,et al.  Interactive Nonlinear Multiobjective Optimization Methods , 2016 .

[25]  W. Edwards,et al.  Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research , 1986 .

[26]  Annika Kangas,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of harvest schedule and data quality , 2015 .