Habit Reversal as a Function of Length of Partial Delay of Reinforcement

While the effects of delay of reinforcement on response acquisition are well known ( 6 ) , there is comparatively little information regarding its effects upon resistance to extinction. Recently, Fehrer ( 3 ) has demonstrated that a constant delay of reinforcement produces an instrumental response that is more resistant to extinction than when reward is immediately forthcoming. In the case of partially delayed reinforcement, in which delay of reward is imposed on a fraction of the training trials, there is considerable evidence (1, 8, 9, 10, 11) that delay of reinforcement enhances resistance to extinction. In addition Logan, et al. ( 7 ) have shown that that effect of partially delayed reinforcement is directly related to the length of delay. When the magnitude of partial delay was increased to 30 sec., the partially delayed Ss ran more rapidly during extinction than control Ss with either no delay or a partial delay of 9 sec. Since all these studies of partially delayed reinforcement have used runways, it appears desirable to investigate the generality of some of these findings in a more complex situation. In the present study a selective learning situation, a single unit T-maze, is employed, and the time required to achieve reversal in a position response constitutes the index of response strength. Some advantages of this criterion of response strength have been pointed out elsewhere ( 5 ). The purpose of the present investigation is then to determine whether or not the acquisition and reversal of a T-maze position response are affected by the length of partially delayed reinforcement.

[1]  E. L. Wike,et al.  The effects of percentage of partially delayed reinforcement on the acquisition and extinction of an instrumental response. , 1957, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[2]  E. Fehrer Effects of amount of reinforcement and of pre- and postreinforcement delays on learning and extinction. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  F. Logan,et al.  Extinction following partial and varied reinforcement. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  E. L. Wike,et al.  The effect of partially delayed reinforcement and trial-distribution on the extinction of an instrumental response. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[5]  L. R. Peterson Variable delayed reinforcement. , 1956, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[6]  J. Hall,et al.  Reinforcement schedules in habit reversal; a confirmation. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Bitterman,et al.  The effect of partial and delayed reinforcement on resistance to extinction. , 1951, The American journal of psychology.