Conductometric Soot Sensors: Internally Caused Thermophoresis as an Important Undesired Side Effect

Particulate matter sensors are of interest for application in the exhaust of any combustion processes, especially for automotive aftertreatment systems. Conductometric soot sensors have been serialized recently. They comprise planar interdigital electrodes (IDE) on an insulating substrate. Between the IDEs, a voltage is applied. Soot deposition is accelerated by the resulting electric field due to electrophoresis. With increasing soot deposition, the conductance between the IDE increases. The timely derivative of the conductance can serve as a sensor signal, being a function of the deposition rate. An increasing voltage between the IDE would be useful for detecting low particle exhausts. In the present study, the influence of the applied voltage and the sensor temperature on the soot deposition is investigated. It turned out that the maximum voltage is limited, since the soot film is heated by the resulting current. An internally caused thermophoresis that reduces the rate of soot deposition on the substrate follows. It reduces both the linearity of the response and the sensitivity. These findings may be helpful for the further development of conductometric soot sensors for automotive exhausts, probably also to determine real driving emissions of particulate matter.

[1]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  Detection of Soot Using a Resistivity Sensor Device Employing Thermophoretic Particle Deposition , 2010, J. Sensors.

[2]  Takeyuki Kamimoto,et al.  A review of soot sensors considered for on-board diagnostics application , 2017 .

[3]  Gary C. Fulks,et al.  Sensing of Particulate Matter for On-Board Diagnosis of Particulate Filters , 2012 .

[4]  Ralf Moos,et al.  Overview on conductometric solid-state gas dosimeters , 2014 .

[5]  Hutomo Suryo Wasisto,et al.  Partially integrated cantilever-based airborne nanoparticle detector for continuous carbon aerosol mass concentration monitoring , 2015 .

[6]  Martin Mohr,et al.  Comparison of mass-based and non-mass-based particle measurement systems for ultra-low emissions from automotive sources. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[7]  Joakim Pagels,et al.  A Potential Soot Mass Determination Method from Resistivity Measurement of Thermophoretically Deposited Soot , 2011 .

[8]  David J. Kubinski,et al.  Current amplification in an electrostatic trap by soot dendrite growth and fragmentation: Application to soot sensors , 2016 .

[9]  Ville Niemelä,et al.  Non-Collecting Electrical Sensor for Particle Concentration Measurement , 2009 .

[10]  Timothy V. Johnson,et al.  Review of diesel emissions and control , 2009 .

[11]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Conductometric Soot Sensor for Automotive Exhausts: Initial Studies , 2010, Sensors.

[12]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts , 2017, Sensors.

[13]  Hyunsoo Kim,et al.  Development of the Particulate Matter Sensor for Diesel Engine , 2019, International Journal of Automotive Technology.

[14]  Ralf Moos,et al.  Improvement of the sensitivity of a conductometric soot sensor by adding a conductive cover layer , 2013 .

[15]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Conductivity for soot sensing: possibilities and limitations. , 2012, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  M. Maricq.  Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: A review , 2007 .

[17]  Zissis Samaras,et al.  Modeling a resistive soot sensor by particle deposition mechanisms , 2018, Journal of Aerosol Science.

[18]  Frank E. Huggins,et al.  Characterization of Fine Particulate Matter Produced by Combustion of Residual Fuel Oil , 2000, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[19]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  In-Operation Monitoring of the Soot Load of Diesel Particulate Filters: Initial Tests , 2013, Topics in Catalysis.

[20]  Jiun-Jian Liaw,et al.  Morphological and semi-quantitative characteristics of diesel soot agglomerates emitted from commercial vehicles and a dynamometer. , 2009, Journal of environmental sciences.

[21]  Andreas Müller,et al.  Conductometric Sensor for Soot Mass Flow Detection in Exhausts of Internal Combustion Engines , 2015, Sensors.

[22]  M. Maricq,et al.  Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter , 2001 .

[23]  H. Burtscher.  Physical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review , 2005 .

[24]  James E. Parks,et al.  Loading and Regeneration Analysis of a Diesel Particulate Filter with a Radio Frequency-Based Sensor , 2010 .

[25]  Zhen Huang,et al.  Review of the state-of-the-art of exhaust particulate filter technology in internal combustion engines. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[26]  Stefan Hausberger,et al.  Road vehicle emission factors development: A review , 2013 .

[27]  Martyn V. Twigg,et al.  Cleaning the Air We Breathe - Controlling Diesel Particulate Emissions from Passenger Cars , 2009 .

[28]  T. Boger,et al.  Different Approaches to Soot Estimation as Key Requirement for DPF Applications , 2009 .

[29]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Capacitive soot sensor for diesel exhausts , 2016 .

[30]  David Y. H. Pui,et al.  Electrostatic Collection of Diesel Particles , 1986 .

[31]  David G. Reid,et al.  ERRATUM: Electrical, magnetic and structural characterization of fullerene soots , 1996 .

[32]  Gunter Hagen,et al.  Thermoelectric Hydrocarbon Sensor in Thick-film Technology for On-Board-Diagnostics of a Diesel Oxidation Catalyst , 2014 .

[33]  Frank Schmidt,et al.  Microscopic aspects of the deposition of nanoparticles from the gas phase , 2002 .

[34]  T. Ochs,et al.  Particulate Matter Sensor for On Board Diagnostics (OBD) of Diesel Particulate Filters (DPF) , 2010 .

[35]  D. Kittelson.  Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[36]  Yann Creff,et al.  Smart Soot Sensor for Particulate Filter OBD , 2013 .

[37]  R. Moos,et al.  Simulation of a thermoelectric gas sensor that determines hydrocarbon concentrations in exhausts and the light-off temperature of catalyst materials , 2017 .

[38]  Takayuki Sakurai,et al.  New Particulate Matter Sensor for On Board Diagnosis , 2011 .

[39]  M. Maricq,et al.  On the electrical charge of motor vehicle exhaust particles , 2006 .

[40]  Philippe Vernoux,et al.  Influence of key parameters on the response of a resistive soot sensor , 2016 .

[41]  U. Alkemade,et al.  Engines and exhaust after treatment systems for future automotive applications , 2006 .

[42]  Reinhard Niessner,et al.  Thermophoretic deposition of soot aerosol particles under experimental conditions relevant for modern diesel engine exhaust gas systems , 2003 .

[43]  J. Namieśnik,et al.  Grain type and size of particulate matter from diesel vehicle exhausts analysed by transmission electron microscopy , 2012, Environmental technology.

[44]  Dieter Brüggemann,et al.  Determination of the Soot Mass by Conductometric Soot Sensors , 2014 .

[45]  Andreas Schütze,et al.  Chemical sensor systems for emission control from combustions , 2013 .