Experimental investigation of the structural behavior of equine urethra

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE An integrated experimental and computational investigation was developed aiming to provide a methodology for characterizing the structural response of the urethral duct. The investigation provides information that are suitable for the actual comprehension of lower urinary tract mechanical functionality and the optimal design of prosthetic devices. METHODS Experimental activity entailed the execution of inflation tests performed on segments of horse penile urethras from both proximal and distal regions. Inflation tests were developed imposing different volumes. Each test was performed according to a two-step procedure. The tubular segment was inflated almost instantaneously during the first step, while volume was held constant for about 300s to allow the development of relaxation processes during the second step. Tests performed on the same specimen were interspersed by 600s of rest to allow the recovery of the specimen mechanical condition. Results from experimental activities were statistically analyzed and processed by means of a specific mechanical model. Such computational model was developed with the purpose of interpreting the general pressure-volume-time response of biologic tubular structures. The model includes parameters that interpret the elastic and viscous behavior of hollow structures, directly correlated with the results from the experimental activities. RESULTS Post-processing of experimental data provided information about the non-linear elastic and time-dependent behavior of the urethral duct. In detail, statistically representative pressure-volume and pressure relaxation curves were identified, and summarized by structural parameters. Considering elastic properties, initial stiffness ranged between 0.677 ± 0.026kPa and 0.262 ± 0.006kPa moving from proximal to distal region of penile urethra. Viscous parameters showed typical values of soft biological tissues, as τ1=0.153±0.018s, τ2=17.458 ± 1.644s and τ1=0.201 ± 0.085, τ2= 8.514 ± 1.379s for proximal and distal regions respectively. DISCUSSION A general procedure for the mechanical characterization of the urethral duct has been provided. The proposed methodology allows identifying mechanical parameters that properly express the mechanical behavior of the biological tube. The approach is especially suitable for evaluating the influence of degenerative phenomena on the lower urinary tract mechanical functionality. The information are mandatory for the optimal design of potential surgical procedures and devices.

[1]  S. Mijailovich,et al.  Effect of urethral compliance on the steady state p‐Q relationships assessed with a mechanical analog of the male lower urinary tract , 2007, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[2]  B. Breyer,et al.  Male urethral strictures and their management , 2014, Nature Reviews Urology.

[3]  S. Semrad,et al.  Cystometrography and urethral pressure profiles in healthy horse and pony mares. , 1987, American journal of veterinary research.

[4]  D. Paolone,et al.  Long-term continence and patient satisfaction after artificial sphincter implantation for urinary incontinence after prostatectomy. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[5]  A. Natali,et al.  Characterization of soft tissue mechanics with aging , 2008, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  Hans Gregersen,et al.  Biomechanical behaviour of oesophageal tissues: material and structural configuration, experimental data and constitutive analysis. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[7]  M. Fall,et al.  High revision rate following artificial urethral sphincter implantation , 2014, Scandinavian journal of urology.

[8]  P. Devine,et al.  Urethral strictures. , 1980, The Journal of urology.

[9]  F. Sampaio,et al.  A morphometric analysis of bulbar urethral strictures , 2007, BJU international.

[10]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Least Squares Data Fitting with Applications , 2012 .

[11]  Andrew Feola,et al.  Tissue mechanics, animal models, and pelvic organ prolapse: a review. , 2009, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[12]  André Garon,et al.  Novel, Remotely Controlled, Artificial Urinary Sphincter: A Retro-Compatible Device , 2014 .

[13]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Temporal trends in adoption of and indications for the artificial urinary sphincter. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[14]  K. Coyne,et al.  Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. , 2006, European urology.

[15]  Maneesha Vinodini Ramesh,et al.  Design of wireless real time artificial sphincter control system for Urinary Incontinence , 2014, 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging Technologies.

[16]  Arturo N. Natali,et al.  Analysis of the biomechanical behaviour of gastrointestinal regions adopting an experimental and computational approach , 2014, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  Silvia Todros,et al.  Experimental investigation of the biomechanics of urethral tissues and structures , 2016, Experimental physiology.

[18]  Y. Chen,et al.  Flow through a collapsible tube. Experimental analysis and mathematical model. , 1969, Biophysical journal.

[19]  A I Katz,et al.  Mechanics of Distension of Dog Veins and Other Very Thin‐Walled Tubular Structures , 1970, Circulation research.

[20]  D. J. Griffiths Hydrodynamics of male micturition—I Theory of steady flow through elastic-walled tubes , 1971, Medical and biological engineering.

[21]  E. Chung A state-of-the-art review on the evolution of urinary sphincter devices for the treatment of post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence: Past, present and future innovations , 2014, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[22]  K. McVary Lower urinary tract symptoms and sexual dysfunction: epidemiology and pathophysiology , 2006, BJU international.

[23]  M. Barry,et al.  Patient-re ported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy , 1993 .

[24]  J. Grotberg,et al.  BIOFLUID MECHANICS IN FLEXIBLE TUBES , 2001 .

[25]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  Biomechanical modeling of the small intestine as required for the design and operation of a robotic endoscope , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[26]  Silvia Todros,et al.  Mechanics of the urethral duct: tissue constitutive formulation and structural modeling for the investigation of lumen occlusion , 2017, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[27]  M. H. Ross,et al.  Histology: A Text and Atlas , 1985 .

[28]  Finlay,et al.  Uneven pressure application by the artificial urinary sphincter: an explanation for tissue ischaemia? , 1999, BJU international.

[29]  N. Ronen Measurements of urethral pressure profiles in the male horse. , 1994, Equine veterinary journal.

[30]  W. Conrad,et al.  Pressure--flow relationships in collapsible tubes. , 1969, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[31]  N. Singla,et al.  Does Pressure Regulating Balloon Location Make a Difference in Functional Outcomes of Artificial Urinary Sphincter? , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[32]  D. J. Griffiths Hydrodynamics of male micturition—II Measurements of stream parameters and urethral elasticity , 1971, Medical and biological engineering.

[33]  H. Ustun,et al.  The acute effects of increased intra-abdominal pressure on testicular tissue: an experimental study in pigs. , 2011, Urology.

[34]  A. Mundy,et al.  Urethral strictures , 2011, BJU international.

[35]  M. Foss,et al.  Histologic study of urethral extracellular matrix and collagen from aging and long-term alloxan-induced diabetic male rats. , 2011, Urology.

[36]  C. G. Fontanella,et al.  Computational tools for the analysis of mechanical functionality of gastrointestinal structures. , 2013, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[37]  Magnus Fall,et al.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. , 2003, Urology.

[38]  J. Sønksen,et al.  Urethral pressure reflectometry; a novel technique for simultaneous recording of pressure and cross‐sectional area: a study of feasibility in the prostatic urethra , 2012, BJU international.

[39]  C. Dubeau The aging lower urinary tract. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[40]  W. Artibani,et al.  Understanding the burden of stress urinary incontinence in Europe: a qualitative review of the literature. , 2004, European urology.

[41]  Kai Li,et al.  Creation of the digital three-dimensional model of the prostate and its adjacent structures based on Chinese visible human , 2010, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.

[42]  J Böhme,et al.  Clinical implementation of finite element models in pelvic ring surgery for prediction of implant behavior: a case report. , 2012, Clinical biomechanics.

[43]  F. Debruyne,et al.  The morbidity due to lower urinary tract function in spinal cord injury patients , 1993, Paraplegia.

[44]  C. G. Fontanella,et al.  A procedure for the computational investigation of stress-relaxation phenomena , 2013 .

[45]  P. Thind An analysis of urethral viscoelasticity with particular reference to the sphincter function in healthy women , 1995, International Urogynecology Journal.

[46]  L. L. Lavalle,et al.  [Lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction]. , 2010, Archivos espanoles de urologia.

[47]  V A Minassian,et al.  Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem , 2003, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[48]  Bert Müller,et al.  Optimization of the artificial urinary sphincter: modelling and experimental validation , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[49]  J. Kristensen,et al.  Pressure/cross-sectional area relations in the proximal urethra of healthy males: the time dependent pressure response following forced dilation , 2002, Urological Research.

[50]  P. Bagi Pressure/cross-sectional area relations in the proximal urethra of healthy males , 2002, Urological Research.

[51]  A. Brading The physiology of the mammalian urinary outflow tract , 1999, Experimental physiology.

[52]  A. Bates,et al.  Complications following artificial urinary sphincter placement after radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy: a meta‐analysis , 2015, BJU international.

[53]  N. Singla,et al.  Artificial urinary sphincters for male stress urinary incontinence: current perspectives , 2016, Medical devices.