Dynamic line rating for wind power

Dynamic line rating is a novel technique used to determine the actual value of available power transmission capacity of overhead lines being underestimated by static line rating. Contrary to static line rating method, this approach provides huge technical and economic benefits of transmitting the electrical energy under controlled constraints. Nevertheless, it is of utmost importance to have an accurate knowledge of dynamic ampacity before being practically implemented. Owing to dynamic line rating technique, an overhead conductor is rated on the basis of real-time ampacity. Furthermore, the real time ampacity contributes in combating the growing power transmission demand being observed over highly congested power transmission network. Contrary to dynamic line rating approach, building new overhead lines is a lengthy, expensive, and less reliable option. Another important advantage offered by the dynamic line rating approach is to allow excessive renewable power generation in the electricity network, particularly the wind power due to its correlation with real-time ampacity. Besides, dynamic ampacity and wind power integration, the paper also deals with risk analysis associated with conductor overloading. The risk involves increase in conductor sag as it transmits the power beyond its nominal capacity at a certain temperature. However, in this paper, the dynamic as well as the static ampacity of “VL3” overhead conductor is calculated on the basis of its nominal temperature (50 °C) to avoid the risk of its possible expansion and ultimately the deterioration. In addition to technical analysis, the economic analysis of integrating a 60 MW wind park with Fortum's 130 kV regional grid and of applying dynamic line rating approach on a periodically overloaded “VL3” overhead conductor is thoroughly investigated in this research work; to further know how beneficial it is to temporarily postpone the rebuilding and/or construction of a new overhead line in parallel to the existing overhead conductor (VL3).

[1]  Gerald Thomas Heydt,et al.  Prospects for dynamic transmission circuit ratings , 2001, ISCAS 2001. The 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (Cat. No.01CH37196).

[2]  D. John Morrow,et al.  Partial least squares model for dynamic rating of overhead lines in wind intensive areas based on field measurements , 2013 .

[3]  Nikos D. Hatziargyriou,et al.  Integrating distributed generation into electric power systems: A review of drivers, challenges and opportunities , 2007 .

[4]  M. M. Morcos,et al.  An Application of Dynamic Thermal Line Rating Control System to Up-Rate the Ampacity of Overhead Transmission Lines , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  Lennart Söder,et al.  Impact From Dynamic Line Rating on Wind Power Integration , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[6]  Pavlos S. Georgilakis,et al.  Technical challenges associated with the integration of wind power into power systems , 2008 .

[7]  M. Fotuhi-Firuzabad,et al.  Fuzzy Dynamic Thermal Rating of Transmission Lines , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[8]  Jin-O Kim,et al.  Prediction of Dynamic Line Rating Based on Assessment Risk by Time Series Weather Model , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems.

[9]  Carl Johan Wallnerström On Incentives affecting Risk and Asset Management of Power Distribution , 2011 .

[10]  Farrokh Albuyeh,et al.  Grid of the future , 2009, IEEE Power and Energy Magazine.

[11]  C. J. Wallnerstrom,et al.  Potential of dynamic rating in Sweden , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS).

[12]  D. A. Douglass,et al.  Weather-dependent versus static thermal line ratings (power overhead lines) , 1988 .

[13]  E. C. Bascom,et al.  Dynamic thermal ratings realize circuit load limits , 2000 .

[14]  Lasantha Meegahapola,et al.  Comparative analysis of dynamic line rating models and feasibility to minimise energy losses in wind rich power networks , 2013 .