The effects of the intended behavior of students in the use of M-learning

Display Omitted The purpose of this work was to examine students' attitude toward M-learning.This paper describes the study of factors that affect the intended behavior of students.The analysis conducted among students on TF in Bor, University of Belgrade.SEM was applied and tested based on fit index, measurement and structural model.The most significant influences of using M-learning. In future, M-learning will no longer be a choice but a necessity in the modern way of learning so that students would be able to keep pace with the times and technology. M-learning has an increasingly significant role in the development of teaching methods of learning in higher education. By using mobile technology, students can easily and quickly access and use learning resources anytime and anywhere. The aim of this paper is to present the results of research in the application of new technologies in higher education with particular emphasis on M-learning as a modern innovative approach. The study was conducted using a survey among students at the Technical Faculty in Bor, University of Belgrade. The proper conclusions were drawn from the data obtained by the survey which had been analyzed by using the appropriate statistical methods in software packages SPSS v. 17 and LISREL v. 8.8.

[1]  Mohammed Samaka,et al.  Open Education Resources and Mobile Technology to Narrow the Learning Divide , 2013 .

[2]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Exploring smart phone improvements based on a hybrid MCDM model , 2014, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Kirstie Donnelly.  Learning on the move: how m‐learning could transform training and development , 2009 .

[4]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[5]  Rozhan M Idrus,et al.  Role of institutions of higher learning towards a knowledge-based community utilising mobile devices , 2010 .

[6]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[7]  B. Byrne.  Testing for Multigroup Invariance Using AMOS Graphics: A Road Less Traveled , 2004 .

[8]  Amarolinda Zanela Klein,et al.  M-Learning in Practice: Using SMS for Teaching and Learning in Undergraduate Courses , 2015, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[9]  E. Skinner,et al.  Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. , 1993 .

[10]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Adult learners' intention to adopt mobile learning: A motivational perspective , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  Chang Liu,et al.  An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software , 2007, Communications of the IIMA.

[12]  Janka Táborecká-Petrovičová,et al.  LINKING SERVICE QUALITY AND SATISFACTION TO BEHAVIOURAL INTENTIONS IN HIGHER EDUCATION SETTING , 2013 .

[13]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications , 1994 .

[14]  Martin Oliver,et al.  Maintaining, Changing and Crossing Contexts: An Activity Theoretic Reinterpretation of Mobile Learning. , 2008 .

[15]  Ravi Toteja,et al.  Usefulness of M-Devices in Education: A Survey☆ , 2012 .

[16]  Doris Lee,et al.  Critical issues of m-learning: design models, adoption processes, and future trends , 2011 .

[17]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  An empirical analysis of the adoption of m-learning in Malaysia , 2011, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[18]  V. Zeithaml,et al.  E-S-QUAL A Multiple-Item Scale for Assessing Electronic Service Quality , 2004 .

[19]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  An Integrative Approach to the Assessment of E-Commerce Quality , 2002, J. Electron. Commer. Res..

[21]  N. Ibrahim,et al.  USE OF SMARTPHONES AMONG MEDICAL STUDENTS IN THE CLINICAL YEARS AT A MEDICAL SCHOOL IN SUB- SAHARA AFRICA :A PILOT STUDY , 2014 .

[22]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Fu Lee Wang,et al.  Investigating Acceptance towards Mobile Learning in Higher Education Students , 2015 .

[24]  Kenneth C. C. Yang,et al.  Exploring factors affecting the adoption of mobile commerce in Singapore , 2005, Telematics Informatics.

[25]  Wiwat Orawiwatnakul,et al.  Using Mobile-Assisted Exercises to Support Students' Vocabulary Skill Development. , 2015 .

[26]  Niall Winters,et al.  What is mobile learning , 2006 .

[27]  Reshmy Krishnan,et al.  Towards pervasive mobile learning – the vision of 21st century , 2011 .

[28]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[29]  June Lu,et al.  Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[30]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[31]  Masoud Hashemi,et al.  What is Mobile Learning? Challenges and Capabilities , 2011 .

[32]  Ivan Ganchev,et al.  INFOSTATION-BASED ADAPTABLE PROVISION OF M-LEARNING SERVICES: MAIN SCENARIOS , 2008 .

[33]  Kinshuk,et al.  Mobile technology in collaboration: evaluation of a web-based discussion board , 2008, Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organisation.

[34]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Predicting the drivers of behavioral intention to use mobile learning: A hybrid SEM-Neural Networks approach , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[35]  Hüseyin Uzunboylu,et al.  Teacher perception for m-learning: scale development and teachers' perceptions , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[36]  Ahmad Abu-Al-Aish,et al.  International of Research in Open and Distributed Learning Factors Influencing Students’ Acceptance of M-Learning: An Investigation in Higher Education , 2022 .

[37]  Arun Rai,et al.  Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[39]  Ahmad Rizal Madar,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF MOBILE APPLICATION IN LEARNING FOR STUDENT OF KOLEJ POLY-TECH MARA (KPTM) BY USING MOBILE PHONE , 2013 .

[40]  Hüseyin Uzunboylu,et al.  M-learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Maria del Carmen Juan Lizandra,et al.  Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study , 2015, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[43]  Anibal Zaldivar,et al.  Using Mobile Technologies to Support Learning in Computer Science Students , 2015, IEEE Latin America Transactions.

[44]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[45]  Huei Huang Kuan,et al.  The Impact of Usability on the Intention of Planned Purchases in E-commerce Service Websites , 2003, PACIS.

[46]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[47]  J. Traxler.  Defining, Discussing and Evaluating Mobile Learning: The moving finger writes and having writ . . . . , 2007 .

[48]  Sung Youl Park,et al.  University students' behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model , 2012, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[49]  Shogo Kato,et al.  Reply speed to mobile text messages among Japanese college students: When a quick reply is preferred and a late reply is acceptable , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[50]  Mohamed Amin Embi,et al.  Mobile Learning Framework for Lifelong Learning , 2010 .

[51]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Determining factors affecting broadband services adoption: an empirical analysis of Malaysian consumers , 2012 .