Conceptualising, investigating and stimulating representational flexibility in mathematical problem solving and learning: a critical review

Based on Verschaffel et al.’s conceptualisation of flexible strategy choice, this article provides a critical review on the literature concerning flexible representational choice in mathematical learning. We argue that, while flexibility in the selection of a representation to complete a mathematical task has traditionally been understood as choosing the representation(s) that match(es) the characteristics of the to-be-solved task, research evidence suggests that it also includes the ability to take into account the characteristics of the subjects interacting with the representations, as well as the context in which such interaction takes place. The instructional and research implications of acknowledging the subjectivity and contextuality of flexible representational choice are examined.

[1]  Merlyn J. Behr,et al.  Representations and translations among representations in mathematics learning and problem solving , 1987 .

[2]  Andra A. DiSessa.  Inventing Graphing: Meta­ Representational Expertise in Children , 1991 .

[3]  Jere Confrey,et al.  A student's construction of transformations of functions in a multiple representational environment , 1996 .

[4]  Iliada Elia,et al.  Relations Between Secondary Pupils’ Conceptions About Functions and Problem Solving in Different Representations , 2007 .

[5]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Slower Algebra Students Meet Faster Tools: Solving Algebra Word Problems with Graphing Software , 2006 .

[6]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[7]  Ed Dubinsky,et al.  The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy [MAA Notes, Volume 25] , 1992 .

[8]  J Meyer,et al.  Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model , 2000, Ergonomics.

[9]  L. Verschaffel,et al.  Conceptualizing, investigating, and enhancing adaptive expertise in elementary mathematics education , 2009 .

[10]  Jere Confrey,et al.  Function probe , 1996, CACM.

[11]  Athanasios Gagatsis *,et al.  Ability to Translate from One Representation of the Concept of Function to Another and Mathematical Problem Solving , 2004 .

[12]  Yuri Uesaka,et al.  Active Comparison as a Means of Promoting the Development of Abstract Conditional Knowledge and Appropriate Choice of Diagrams in Math Word Problem Solving , 2006, Diagrams.

[13]  Ruhama Even,et al.  Factors involved in linking representations of functions , 1998 .

[14]  Wolff-Michael Roth,et al.  Professionals Read Graphs: A Semiotic Analysis , 2001 .

[15]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[16]  R. Spiro,et al.  The Art of Multimedia and the State of Education@@@Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology , 1992 .

[17]  R. Siegler,et al.  Older and younger adults' strategy choices in multiplication: testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[18]  Ian Spence,et al.  Judging Proportion with Graphs: The Summation Model , 1998 .

[19]  Shari Ellis,et al.  Strategy Choice in Sociocultural Context , 1997 .

[20]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Proximity Compatibility and Information Display: Effects of Color, Space, and Objectness on Information Integration , 1990 .

[21]  R. Lehrer,et al.  Technology and mathematics education , 2008 .

[22]  Jan van der Meij,et al.  Learning with Multiple Representations , 1998 .

[23]  S. A. Ozgun-Koca.  The Effects of Multiple Linked Representations on Students' Learning of Linear Relationships. , 2004 .

[24]  G. Goldin,et al.  Affect and Meta-Affect in Mathematical Problem Solving: a Representational Perspective , 2006 .

[25]  Andrea A. diSessa,et al.  Meta-representation: an introduction , 2000 .

[26]  Beate Grawemeyer,et al.  Evaluation of ERST - An External Representation Selection Tutor , 2006, Diagrams.

[27]  Michal Yerushalmy,et al.  Student perceptions of aspects of algebraic function using multiple representation software , 1991 .

[28]  J. Greeno,et al.  Practicing Representation: Learning with and about Representational Forms , 1997 .

[29]  Richard Cox.  Analytical reasoning with multiple external representations , 1996 .

[30]  Barbara J. Dougherty,et al.  Mathematics Education Across Cultures: Proceedings of the 42nd Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , 2020 .

[31]  David W. Carraher,et al.  Street mathematics and school mathematics , 1993 .

[32]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Strengths and Weaknesses of the Choice/No-Choice Method in Research on Strategy Use , 2009 .

[33]  Peter C.-H. Cheng,et al.  Unlocking conceptual learning in mathematics and science with effective representational systems , 1999, Comput. Educ..

[34]  Iliada Elia,et al.  THE NATURE OF MULTIPLE REPRESENTATIONS IN DEVELOPING MATHEMATICAL RELATIONSHIPS 1 , 2002 .

[35]  Claude Janvier.  Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics , 1987 .

[36]  Donald W. Stover.  A Student's Construction. , 1973 .

[37]  W. Doise,et al.  Life-Span Developmental Psychology , 1998 .

[38]  Z. Diénès.  Building Up Mathematics , 1960 .

[39]  D. Schifter,et al.  A research companion to Principles and standards for school mathematics , 2003 .

[40]  Shaaron Ainsworth,et al.  Examining the Effects of Different Multiple Representational Systems in Learning Primary Mathematics , 2002 .

[41]  Gaea Leinhardt,et al.  Functions, Graphs, and Graphing: Tasks, Learning, and Teaching , 1990 .

[42]  S. Koca.  The effects of multiple linked representations on students' learning of linear relationships , 2004 .

[43]  Tessa H.S. Eysink,et al.  The Effects of Representational Format in Simulation-Based Inquiry Learning , 2005 .

[44]  Joachim Meyer,et al.  Multiple Factors that Determine Performance with Tables and Graphs , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[45]  John A. Sparrow,et al.  Graphical displays in information systems: some data properties influencing the effectiveness of alternative forms , 1989 .

[46]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[47]  David J. Gilmore,et al.  Comprehension and Recall of Miniature Programs , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[48]  Gerald A. Goldin,et al.  Affective Pathways and Representation in Mathematical Problem Solving , 2000 .