The impact response of motorcycle helmets at different impact severities.

Helmets reduce the frequency and severity of head and brain injuries over a range of impact severities broader than those covered by the impact attenuation standards. Our goal was to document the impact attenuation performance of common helmet types over a wide range of impact speeds. Sixty-five drop tests were performed against the side of 10 different helmets onto a flat anvil at impact speeds of 0.9-10.1 m/s (energy=2-260J; equivalent drop heights of 0.04-5.2 m). Three non-approved beanie helmets performed poorly, with the worst helmet reaching a peak headform acceleration of 852g at 29J. Three full-face and one open-face helmet responded similarly from about 100g at 30J to between 292g and 344g at 256-260J. Three shorty style helmets responded like the full-face helmets up to 150J, above which varying degrees of foam densification appeared to occur. Impact restitution values varied from 0.19 to 0.46. A three-parameter model successfully captured the plateau and densification responses exhibited by the various helmets (R(2)=0.95-0.99). Helmet responses varied with foam thickness, foam material and possibly shell material, with the largest response differences consistent with either the presence/absence of a foam liner or the densification of the foam liner.

[1]  Nicholas J. Mills,et al.  FEA of oblique impact tests on a motorcycle helmet , 2009 .

[2]  S. Duma,et al.  Biomechanical risk estimates for mild traumatic brain injury. , 2007, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[3]  Noboru Kikuchi,et al.  Constitutive modeling of polymeric foam material subjected to dynamic crash loading , 1998 .

[4]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME II: APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA , 1980 .

[5]  Joseph T. Gwin,et al.  HEAD IMPACT SEVERITY MEASURES FOR EVALUATING MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY RISK EXPOSURE , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[6]  Vira Kasantikul,et al.  Effectiveness of collision-involved motorcycle helmets in Thailand. , 2003, Annual proceedings. Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine.

[7]  Peter Halldin,et al.  A New Laboratory Rig for Evaluating Helmets Subject to Oblique Impacts , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[8]  Andrew Mellor,et al.  Advanced Motorcycle Helmets , 2005 .

[9]  M.S.J. Hashmi,et al.  Motorcycle helmet: Part II. Materials and design issues , 2002 .

[10]  Harald Zellmer,et al.  Investigation of the performance of motorcycle helmets under impact conditions , 1993 .

[11]  D R Thom,et al.  UPDATING THE TWENTY-YEAR OLD DOT HELMET STANDARD (FMVSS NO. 218) , 1996 .

[12]  B S Shankar,et al.  Helmet use, patterns of injury, medical outcome, and costs among motorcycle drivers in Maryland. , 1992, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  A Gilchrist,et al.  The effectiveness of foams in bicycle and motorcycle helmets. , 1991, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  P. Salzberg,et al.  Motorcycle helmet use and injury outcome and hospitalization costs from crashes in Washington State. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[15]  S. Boufous,et al.  Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. , 2008, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[16]  Andrew Nagy,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Foamed Materials Under Dynamic Compression , 1974 .

[17]  Erich Schuller,et al.  Criteria for head impact protection by motorcycle helmets , 1993 .

[18]  J F Kraus,et al.  The prevalence of non-standard helmet use and head injuries among motorcycle riders. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Simon Ouellet,et al.  Compressive response of polymeric foams under quasi-static, medium and high strain rate conditions , 2006 .