H2 analysis and synthesis of networked dynamic systems

This work provides a general framework for the analysis and synthesis of a class of linear networked dynamic systems (NDS). We focus our attention on NDS where the underlying connection topology couples the agents at their outputs. A distinction is made between NDS with homogeneous agent dynamics and NDS with heterogeneous agent dynamics. In the homogeneous setting, the H2 norm expression reduces to the Frobenius norm of the underlying connection topology incidence matrix, E(G), scaled by the H2 norm of the agents comprising the NDS. In the heterogeneous case, the H2 norm becomes the weighted Frobenius norm of the incidence matrix, where the weights appear on the nodes of the graph. The H2 norm characterization is then used to synthesize NDS with certain H2 performance. Specifically, a semi-definite programming solution is presented to design a local controller for each agent when the underlying topology is fixed. A solution using Kruskal's algorithm for finding a minimum weight spanning tree is used to design the optimal NDS topology given fixed agent dynamics.

[1]  Mehran Mesbahi,et al.  On the observability properties of homogeneous and heterogeneous networked dynamic systems , 2008, 2008 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[2]  Fernando Paganini,et al.  A Course in Robust Control Theory , 2000 .

[3]  Charles R. Johnson,et al.  Topics in Matrix Analysis , 1991 .

[4]  Jens Vygen,et al.  The Book Review Column1 , 2020, SIGACT News.

[5]  M. Mesbahi,et al.  Pulling the Strings on Agreement: Anchoring, Controllability, and Graph Automorphisms , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[6]  Shane T. Jensen,et al.  Some Comments and a Bibliography on the Laguerre-Samuelson Inequality with Extensions and Applications in Statistics and Matrix Theory , 1999 .

[7]  Gordon F. Royle,et al.  Algebraic Graph Theory , 2001, Graduate texts in mathematics.

[8]  F. Y. Hadaegh,et al.  Formation Flying Control of Multiple Spacecraft , 1997 .

[9]  P. Wang,et al.  Coordination and control of multiple microspacecraft moving in formation , 1996 .

[10]  G. Dullerud,et al.  A Course in Robust Control Theory: A Convex Approach , 2005 .

[11]  Peter F. Al-Hokayem Stability Analysis of Networked Control Systems , 2003 .

[12]  M. Mesbahi,et al.  Formation flying control of multiple spacecraft via graphs, matrix inequalities, and switching , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications (Cat. No.99CH36328).

[13]  E.M. Atkins,et al.  A survey of consensus problems in multi-agent coordination , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005..

[14]  Roy S. Smith,et al.  Control of Deep-Space Formation-Flying Spacecraft; Relative Sensing and Switched Information , 2005 .

[15]  Mehran Mesbahi,et al.  Formation flying control of multiple spacecraft via graphs , 2001 .

[16]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.