About face: A defence and elaboration of universal dualism

Of the various models of politeness which have been advanced, Brown and Levinson's is the one which most specifically claims its pancultural validity, and therefore its potential application to intercultural studies. However, a number of works have argued that this model is seriously flawed, in particular that its notion of face is culture-specific. This paper attempts an elaboration of the conception of positive and negative face with a view to upholding the claim that these are universal phenomena. In order to accommodate the objections which have been raised to this claim, a revision of the etiological basis and nature of the positive-negative distinction, and also of the characteristics of positive and negative, is necessary. In addition, since much of the criticism rests on an acceptance of other aspects of Brown and Levinson's model, it is necessary to disentangle the central claim from these other aspects.

[1]  O. G. Nwoye,et al.  Linguistic politeness and socio-cultural variations of the notion of face , 1992 .

[2]  Linguistic politeness in Igbo , 1989 .

[3]  T. Sebeok,et al.  Style in language , 1962 .

[4]  N. Fairclough.  Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis , 1985 .

[5]  Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences , 1994 .

[6]  C. García.  Making a request and responding to it: a case study of Peruvian Spanish speakers , 1993 .

[7]  Penelope Brown.  [Review of the book Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech ed. by Florian Coulmas] , 1983 .

[8]  B. Fraser,et al.  The association of deference with linguistic form , 1981 .

[9]  E. F. Schumacher,et al.  A Guide for the Perplexed , 1977 .

[10]  B. Fraser.  Perspectives on politeness , 1990 .

[11]  Y. Matsumoto.  Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese , 1989 .

[12]  Dichotomy in the Structures of Honorifics of Japanese , 1992 .

[13]  George A. Miller,et al.  Language and Communication , 1951 .

[14]  L. Mao.  Beyond politeness theory: ‘Face’ revisited and renewed , 1994 .

[15]  Yueguo Gu.  Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese , 1990 .

[16]  Koenraad Kuiper,et al.  Cultural congruence and conflict in the acquisition of formulae in a second language , 1989 .

[17]  E. Davies.  A Contrastive Approach to the Analysis of Politeness Formulas , 1987 .

[18]  R. Lakoff.  The logic of politeness: or minding your p''s and q''s , 1973 .

[19]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[20]  Politeness and Conversational Universals-Observations from Japanese in Linguistic Politeness II. , 1989 .

[21]  R. Lakoff.  Language and woman's place , 1973, Language in Society.

[22]  L. Post.  The Heart of the Hunter , 1961 .

[23]  Anna Wierzbicka,et al.  Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts: Polish vs. English , 1985 .

[24]  G. Leech.  Principles of pragmatics , 1983 .

[25]  Ralf D. Brown,et al.  THE PRONOUNS OF POWER AND SOLIDARITY , 1968 .

[26]  Keith Chick.  Intercultural miscommunication as a source of friction in the workplace and in educational settings in South Africa , 1989 .

[27]  S. Ide.  Formal forms and discernment: two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness , 1989 .

[28]  Jenny A. Thomas.  Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure , 1983 .

[29]  Penelope Brown,et al.  Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage , 1989 .

[30]  G. Kasper.  Linguistic politeness:: Current research issues☆ , 1990 .

[31]  Akiko Kawasaki,et al.  Universals of linguistic politeness: Quantitative evidence from Japanese and American english , 1986 .

[32]  Joseph H. Greenberg,et al.  Language Universals: With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies , 1966 .

[33]  J. Verschueren,et al.  The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication , 1991 .

[34]  Paul L. Simpson.  Politeness Phenomena in Ionesco’s 'The Lesson' , 1989 .

[35]  Y. Matsumoto.  Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese , 1988 .

[36]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .