Enhancing accuracy with subpixel smoothing for multiband effective-mass Hamiltonians of semiconductor nanostructures

The spatial discontinuity of physical parameters at an abrupt interface may increase numerical errors when solving partial differential equations. Rather than generating boundary-adapted meshes for objects with complicated geometry in the finite-element method, the subpixel smoothing (SPS) replaces discontinuous parameters inside square elements that are bisected by interfaces in, for example, the finite-difference (FD) method, with homogeneous counterparts and matches physical boundary conditions therein. In this work, we apply the idea of SPS to the eight-band effective-mass Luttinger-Kohn (LK) and Burt-Foreman (BF) Hamiltonians of semiconductor nanostructures. Two smoothing approaches are proposed. One stems from eliminations of the first-order perturbation in energy, and the other is an application of the Hellmann-Feynman (HF) theorem. We employ the FD method to numerically solve the eigenvalue problem corresponding to the multiband Schrodinger’s equation for circular quantum wires (QWRs). The eigen-energies and envelope (wave) functions for valence and conduction states in III-V circular QWRs are examined. We find that while the procedure of perturbation theory seems to have the better accuracy than that of HF theorem, the errors of both schemes are considerably lower than that without smoothing or with direct but unjustified averages of parameters. On the other hand, even in the presence of SPS, the numerical results for the LK Hamiltonian of nanostructures could still contain nonphysical spurious solutions with extremely localized states near heterostructure interfaces. The proper operator ordering embedded in the BF Hamiltonian mitigates this problem. The proposed approaches may improve numerical accuracies and reduce computational cost for the modeling of nanostructures in optoelectronic devices.

[1]  Bernd Witzigmann,et al.  Ellipticity and the spurious solution problem of k ∙ p envelope equations , 2007 .

[2]  Van de Walle Cg Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory. , 1989 .

[3]  P. Vogl,et al.  Real-space multiband envelope-function approach without spurious solutions , 2011 .

[4]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Perturbation theory for Maxwell's equations with shifting material boundaries. , 2002, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Improving accuracy by subpixel smoothing in the finite-difference time domain. , 2006, Optics letters.

[6]  T. C. Mcgill,et al.  Numerical spurious solutions in the effective mass approximation , 2003 .

[7]  Shu-Wei Chang,et al.  Improving accuracy using subpixel smoothing for multiband effective-mass Hamiltonians of semiconductor nanostructures , 2016, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[8]  Shun Lien Chuang,et al.  Modeling of strained quantum-well lasers with spin-orbit coupling , 1995 .

[9]  Sercel,et al.  Analytical formalism for determining quantum-wire and quantum-dot band structure in the multiband envelope-function approximation. , 1990, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[10]  Chuang,et al.  Spin-orbit-coupling effects on the valence-band structure of strained semiconductor quantum wells. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[11]  B. A. Foreman,et al.  Elimination of spurious solutions from eight-band k.p theory , 1997 .

[12]  Shun Lien Chuang,et al.  Physics of Photonic Devices , 2009 .

[13]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Perturbation theory for anisotropic dielectric interfaces, and application to subpixel smoothing of discretized numerical methods. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[14]  Van de Walle CG Band lineups and deformation potentials in the model-solid theory. , 1989, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[15]  W. Kohn,et al.  Motion of Electrons and Holes in Perturbed Periodic Fields , 1955 .

[16]  Morten Willatzen,et al.  Exact envelope-function theory versus symmetrized Hamiltonian for quantum wires: a comparison , 2004 .

[17]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method , 2010, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[18]  P. Lawaetz,et al.  Valence-Band Parameters in Cubic Semiconductors , 1971 .

[19]  Cun-Zheng Ning,et al.  k.p Hamiltonian without spurious-state solutions , 2003 .

[20]  Steven G. Johnson,et al.  Accurate finite-difference time-domain simulation of anisotropic media by subpixel smoothing. , 2009, Optics letters.

[21]  Matthias Ehrhardt,et al.  Multi-Band Effective Mass Approximations , 2014 .

[22]  M G Burt,et al.  The justification for applying the effective-mass approximation to microstructures , 1992 .

[23]  B. A. Foreman,et al.  Effective-mass Hamiltonian and boundary conditions for the valence bands of semiconductor microstructures. , 1993, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[24]  Shun Lien Chuang,et al.  A band-structure model of strained quantum-well wurtzite semiconductors , 1997 .

[25]  L. J. Sham,et al.  Electronic Properties of Flat-Band Semiconductor Heterostructures , 1981 .

[26]  G. E. Pikus,et al.  Symmetry and strain-induced effects in semiconductors , 1974 .

[27]  L. Voon,et al.  The k p Method: Electronic Properties of Semiconductors , 2009 .

[28]  Shu-Wei Chang,et al.  Bound-to-continuum absorption with tunneling in type-II nanostructures: a multiband source-radiation approach. , 2013, Optics express.