Performance of radon monitors in a purpose-built radon chamber

The purpose of this paper is to benchmark several different radon monitors, by quantifying their accuracy and response time. Radon monitors with different characteristics were tested in a purpose-built radon chamber under reference conditions. The radon concentration in the chamber was controlled and maintained at a stable radon concentration of (2648 ± 85) Bq m−3 to evaluate the accuracy and precision of these monitors. The response time of the monitors was analysed for two time intervals. To assess the response time of the monitors, radon concentration was varied from a theoretical value of 0–6441 Bq m−3 and then from 6441 to 2648 Bq m−3. The results from this study show that general purpose radon monitors are less accurate than those used by radon testing service providers and the research community. All monitors tested reported a mean radon concentration within the ±10% of the reference detector value at the radon equilibrium concentration. Different response time analysis methods were proposed and discussed, and for the particular time intervals analysed, response time was found to be slower for those radon monitors intended for general purpose applications.

[1]  L. Quindós,et al.  Continuous monitoring of radon gas as a tool to understand air dynamics in the cave of Altamira (Cantabria, Spain). , 2018, The Science of the total environment.

[2]  P. Murphy,et al.  Update of Ireland's national average indoor radon concentration - Application of a new survey protocol. , 2017, Journal of environmental radioactivity.

[3]  A. Caricato,et al.  Critical aspects of radon remediation in karst limestone areas: some experiences in schools of South Italy , 2017, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[4]  D. Wertheim,et al.  Effects of etching time on alpha tracks in solid state nuclear track detectors. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[5]  L. Quindós,et al.  Description of the behavior of an aquifer by using continuous radon monitoring in a thermal spa. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  S. Long,et al.  Inter-comparison of radon detectors for one to four week measurement periods , 2016, Journal of radiological protection : official journal of the Society for Radiological Protection.

[7]  J. Golzarri,et al.  An intercomparison of indoor radon data using NTD and different dynamic recording systems , 2013 .

[8]  F. Bochicchio The newest international trend about regulation of indoor radon. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[9]  M. Marusiaková,et al.  Results of the 2010 National Radiation Protection Institute intercomparison of radon and its short-lived decay product continuous monitors. , 2011, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[10]  N. Ali,et al.  Etch Induction Time in CR-39 Detectors Etched in Na 2 CO 3 Mixed NaOH Solution , 2009 .

[11]  R. Moridi State-of-the-art instruments for measuring radon/thoron and their progeny in dwellings--a review. , 1996, Health physics.

[12]  A C George,et al.  State-of-the-art instruments for measuring radon/thoron and their progeny in dwellings--a review. , 1996, Health physics.