Plant genetic resources for food and agriculture: opportunities and challenges emerging from the science and information technology revolution.

Contents Summary 1407 I. Introduction 1408 II. Technological advances and their utility for gene banks and breeding, and longer-term contributions to SDGs 1408 III. The challenges that must be overcome to realise emerging R&D opportunities 1410 IV. Renewed governance structures for PGR (and related big data) 1413 V. Access and benefit sharing and big data 1416 VI. Conclusion 1417 Acknowledgements 1417 ORCID 1417 References 1417 SUMMARY: Over the last decade, there has been an ongoing revolution in the exploration, manipulation and synthesis of biological systems, through the development of new technologies that generate, analyse and exploit big data. Users of Plant Genetic Resources (PGR) can potentially leverage these capacities to significantly increase the efficiency and effectiveness of their efforts to conserve, discover and utilise novel qualities in PGR, and help achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This review advances the discussion on these emerging opportunities and discusses how taking advantage of them will require data integration and synthesis across disciplinary, organisational and international boundaries, and the formation of multi-disciplinary, international partnerships. We explore some of the institutional and policy challenges that these efforts will face, particularly how these new technologies may influence the structure and role of research for sustainable development, ownership of resources, and access and benefit sharing. We discuss potential responses to political and institutional challenges, ranging from options for enhanced structure and governance of research discovery platforms to internationally brokered benefit-sharing agreements, and identify a set of broad principles that could guide the global community as it seeks or considers solutions.

[1]  A. Hall,et al.  Innovation Systems: Implications for agricultural policy and practice , 2005 .

[2]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[3]  A. O. Fatunbi,et al.  Approaches for Setting-up Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Agricultural Research and Development , 2012 .

[4]  Edward S. Buckler,et al.  Applications of Linkage Disequilibrium and Association Mapping in Maize , 2009 .

[5]  Jacob van Etten,et al.  FIRST EXPERIENCES WITH A NOVEL FARMER CITIZEN SCIENCE APPROACH: CROWDSOURCING PARTICIPATORY VARIETY SELECTION THROUGH ON-FARM TRIADIC COMPARISONS OF TECHNOLOGIES (TRICOT) , 2016, Experimental Agriculture.

[6]  David J. Spielman,et al.  An innovation systems perspective on strengthening agricultural education and training in sub-Saharan Africa , 2008 .

[7]  G.E. Moore,et al.  Cramming More Components Onto Integrated Circuits , 1998, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[8]  M. Tester,et al.  Phenomics--technologies to relieve the phenotyping bottleneck. , 2011, Trends in plant science.

[9]  A. Noman,et al.  CRISPR-Cas9: Tool for Qualitative and Quantitative Plant Genome Editing , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[10]  Peter J Bradbury,et al.  From association to prediction: statistical methods for the dissection and selection of complex traits in plants. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[11]  Jean-Luc Jannink,et al.  Population genetics of genomics-based crop improvement methods. , 2011, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[12]  Elinor Ostrom,et al.  Rent dissipation in a limited-access common-pool resource: Experimental evidence , 1990 .

[13]  Jesse Poland,et al.  Breeding-assisted genomics. , 2015, Current opinion in plant biology.

[14]  C. Leeuwis,et al.  Strengthening Agricultural Innovation Capacity: Are Innovation Brokers the Answer? , 2009 .

[15]  D. Mackill,et al.  Marker-assisted selection: an approach for precision plant breeding in the twenty-first century , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  Andrew Hall,et al.  From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research , 2003 .

[17]  W. Powell,et al.  From mutations to MAGIC: resources for gene discovery, validation and delivery in crop plants. , 2008, Current opinion in plant biology.

[18]  M. Halewood.  What kind of goods are plant genetic resources for food and agriculture? Towards the identification and development of a new global commons , 2013 .

[19]  Stephen Biggs,et al.  A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. , 1990 .

[20]  K. McNally,et al.  Genomics of gene banks: A case study in rice. , 2012, American journal of botany.

[21]  Brett M. Frischmann,et al.  Constructing Commons in the Cultural Environment , 2008 .

[22]  Héctor F. Satizábal,et al.  Enhancing Decision-Making Processes of Small Farmers in Tropical Crops by Means of Machine Learning Models , 2012 .

[23]  J. Howells.  Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation , 2006 .

[24]  Elske van de Fliert,et al.  Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems , 2003 .

[25]  B. Courtois,et al.  A Genome-Wide Association Study on the Seedless Phenotype in Banana (Musa spp.) Reveals the Potential of a Selected Panel to Detect Candidate Genes in a Vegetatively Propagated Crop , 2016, PloS one.

[26]  James Sumberg,et al.  Agricultural research in the face of diversity, local knowledge and the participation imperative: theoretical considerations , 2003 .

[27]  Christopher P Austin,et al.  Prepublication data sharing , 2009, Nature.

[28]  J. McPherson,et al.  Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[29]  How can the Data Revolution contribute to climate action in smallholder agriculture , 2017 .

[30]  L. Totir,et al.  Predicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction , 2014, Crop and Pasture Science.

[31]  H. Puchta.  Applying CRISPR/Cas for genome engineering in plants: the best is yet to come. , 2017, Current opinion in plant biology.

[32]  Nelson B. Villoria,et al.  Green Revolution research saved an estimated 18 to 27 million hectares from being brought into agricultural production , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Revolutionizing plant biology: multiple ways of genome engineering by CRISPR/Cas , 2016, Plant Methods.

[34]  L. Klerkx.  Establishment and embedding of innovation brokers at different innovation system levels: insights from the Dutch agricultural sector , 2009 .

[35]  Open Access DNA, RNA and Amino Acid Sequences: The Consequences and Solutions for the International Regulation of Access and Benefit Sharing , 2016, Journal of law and medicine.

[36]  V. Srivastava,et al.  Editing Plant Genomes: a new era of crop improvement. , 2016, Plant biotechnology journal.

[37]  M. Yamasaki,et al.  Genome-wide association study using whole-genome sequencing rapidly identifies new genes influencing agronomic traits in rice , 2016, Nature Genetics.