Lattice light-sheet microscopy: Imaging molecules to embryos at high spatiotemporal resolution

Introduction In vivo imaging provides a window into the spatially complex, rapidly evolving physiology of the cell that structural imaging alone cannot. However, observing this physiology directly involves inevitable tradeoffs of spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and phototoxicity. This is especially true when imaging in three dimensions, which is essential to obtain a complete picture of many dynamic subcellular processes. Although traditional in vivo imaging tools, such as widefield and confocal microscopy, and newer ones, such as light-sheet microscopy, can image in three dimensions, they sacrifice substantial spatiotemporal resolution to do so and, even then, can often be used for only very limited durations before altering the physiological state of the specimen. Lattice light-sheet microscopy. An ultrathin structured light sheet (blue-green, center) excites fluorescence (orange) in successive planes as it sweeps through a specimen (gray) to generate a 3D image. The speed, noninvasiveness, and high spatial resolution of this approach make it a promising tool for in vivo 3D imaging of fast dynamic processes in cells and embryos, as shown here in five surrounding examples. Lattice light-sheet microscopy. An ultrathin structured light sheet (blue-green, center) excites fluorescence (orange) in successive planes as it sweeps through a specimen (gray) to generate a 3D image. The speed, noninvasiveness, and high spatial resolution of this approach make it a promising tool for in vivo 3D imaging of fast dynamic processes in cells and embryos, as shown here in five surrounding examples. Rationale To address these limitations, we developed a new microscope using ultrathin light sheets derived from two-dimensional (2D) optical lattices. These are scanned plane-by-plane through the specimen to generate a 3D image. The thinness of the sheet leads to high axial resolution and negligible photobleaching and background outside of the focal plane, while its simultaneous illumination of the entire field of view permits imaging at hundreds of planes per second even at extremely low peak excitation intensities. By implementing either superresolution structured illumination or by dithering the lattice to create a uniform light sheet, we imaged cells and small embryos in three dimensions, often at subsecond intervals, for hundreds to thousands of time points at the diffraction limit and beyond. Results We demonstrated the technique on 20 different biological processes spanning four orders of magnitude in space and time, including the binding kinetics of single Sox2 transcription factor molecules, 3D superresolution photoactivated localization microscopy of nuclear lamins, dynamic organelle rearrangements and 3D tracking of microtubule plus ends during mitosis, neutrophil motility in a collagen mesh, and subcellular protein localization and dynamics during embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. Throughout, we established the performance advantages of lattice light-sheet microscopy compared with previous techniques and highlighted phenomena that, when seen at increased spatiotemporal detail, may hint at previously unknown biological mechanisms. Conclusion Photobleaching and phototoxicity are typically reduced by one to two orders of magnitude relative to that seen with a 1D scanned Bessel beam or the point array scanned excitation of spinning disk confocal microscopy. This suggests that the instantaneous peak power delivered to the specimen may be an even more important metric of cell health than the total photon dose and should enable extended 3D observation of endogenous levels of even sparsely expressed proteins produced by genome editing. Improvements of similar magnitude in imaging speed and a twofold gain in axial resolution relative to confocal microscopy yield 4D spatiotemporal resolution high enough to follow fast, nanoscale dynamic processes that would otherwise be obscured by poor resolution along one or more axes of spacetime. Last, the negligible background makes lattice light-sheet microscopy a promising platform for the extension of all methods of superresolution to larger and more densely fluorescent specimens and enables the study of signaling, transport, and stochastic self-assembly in complex environments with single-molecule sensitivity. From single molecules to embryos in living color Animation defines life, and the three-dimensional (3D) imaging of dynamic biological processes occurring within living specimens is essential to understand life. However, in vivo imaging, especially in 3D, involves inevitable tradeoffs of resolution, speed, and phototoxicity. Chen et al. describe a microscope that can address these concerns. They used a class of nondiffracting beams, known as 2D optical lattices, which spread the excitation energy across the entire field of view while simultaneously eliminating out-of-focus excitation. Lattice light sheets increase the speed of image acquisition and reduce phototoxicity, which expands the range of biological problems that can be investigated. The authors illustrate the power of their approach using 20 distinct biological systems ranging from single-molecule binding kinetics to cell migration and division, immunology, and embryonic development. Science, this issue 10.1126/science.1257998 A new microscope allows three-dimensional imaging of living systems at very high resolution in real time. Although fluorescence microscopy provides a crucial window into the physiology of living specimens, many biological processes are too fragile, are too small, or occur too rapidly to see clearly with existing tools. We crafted ultrathin light sheets from two-dimensional optical lattices that allowed us to image three-dimensional (3D) dynamics for hundreds of volumes, often at subsecond intervals, at the diffraction limit and beyond. We applied this to systems spanning four orders of magnitude in space and time, including the diffusion of single transcription factor molecules in stem cell spheroids, the dynamic instability of mitotic microtubules, the immunological synapse, neutrophil motility in a 3D matrix, and embryogenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. The results provide a visceral reminder of the beauty and the complexity of living systems.

[1]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Measurement of mechanical tractions exerted by cells in three-dimensional matrices , 2010, Nature Methods.

[2]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[3]  F. Del Bene,et al.  Optical Sectioning Deep Inside Live Embryos by Selective Plane Illumination Microscopy , 2004, Science.

[4]  Denis Wirtz,et al.  Three-dimensional cell migration does not follow a random walk , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Ulrich Kubitscheck,et al.  High-contrast single-particle tracking by selective focal plane illumination microscopy. , 2008, Optics express.

[6]  F. Piano,et al.  Diverse roles of actin in C. elegans early embryogenesis , 2007, BMC Developmental Biology.

[7]  Liang Gao,et al.  3D live fluorescence imaging of cellular dynamics using Bessel beam plane illumination microscopy , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[8]  Eric Betzig Excitation strategies for optical lattice microscopy. , 2005, Optics express.

[9]  S. Martinelli,et al.  Differentiated HL-60 cells are a valid model system for the analysis of human neutrophil migration and chemotaxis. , 2002, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[10]  Long Cai,et al.  Single cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling , 2012, Nature Methods.

[11]  K. Verbrugghe,et al.  Condensin and the Spindle Midzone Prevent Cytokinesis Failure Induced by Chromatin Bridges in C. elegans Embryos , 2013, Current Biology.

[12]  K. Oegema,et al.  Systematic analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans reveals that the spindle checkpoint is composed of two largely independent branches. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[13]  M. Davidson,et al.  Rapid three-dimensional isotropic imaging of living cells using Bessel beam plane illumination , 2011, Nature Methods.

[14]  Philipp J. Keller,et al.  Quantitative high-speed imaging of entire developing embryos with simultaneous multiview light-sheet microscopy , 2012, Nature Methods.

[15]  Eric Betzig,et al.  High-speed, low-photodamage nonlinear imaging using passive pulse splitters , 2008, Nature Methods.

[16]  Till Bretschneider,et al.  Subsecond reorganization of the actin network in cell motility and chemotaxis. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R. Pepperkok,et al.  Spectral imaging and its applications in live cell microscopy , 2003, FEBS letters.

[18]  Jan Huisken,et al.  Selective plane illumination microscopy techniques in developmental biology , 2009, Development.

[19]  R. W. Draft,et al.  Transgenic strategies for combinatorial expression of fluorescent proteins in the nervous system , 2007, Nature.

[20]  M. Koonce,et al.  Microtubule-Nucleus Interactions in Dictyostelium discoideum Mediated by Central Motor Kinesins , 2009, Eukaryotic Cell.

[21]  Alexandr Jonás,et al.  Three-dimensional tracking of fluorescent nanoparticles with subnanometer precision by use of off-focus imaging. , 2003, Optics letters.

[22]  H. P. Kao,et al.  Tracking of single fluorescent particles in three dimensions: use of cylindrical optics to encode particle position. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[23]  R. G. Denning,et al.  Fabrication of photonic crystals for the visible spectrum by holographic lithography , 2000, Nature.

[24]  Toshihiko Oka,et al.  Mitotic Phosphorylation of Dynamin-related GTPase Drp1 Participates in Mitochondrial Fission* , 2007, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  S. Tsukita,et al.  Real-time imaging of cell-cell adherens junctions reveals that Drosophila mesoderm invagination begins with two phases of apical constriction of cells. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[26]  G. Griffiths,et al.  Cell polarisation and the immunological synapse , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  Wesley R. Legant,et al.  Single-Molecule Dynamics of Enhanceosome Assembly in Embryonic Stem Cells , 2014, Cell.

[28]  M. Gustafsson,et al.  Three-dimensional resolution doubling in wide-field fluorescence microscopy by structured illumination. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[29]  K. Edwards,et al.  GFP-moesin illuminates actin cytoskeleton dynamics in living tissue and demonstrates cell shape changes during morphogenesis in Drosophila. , 1997, Developmental biology.

[30]  Victoria J Allan,et al.  Light Microscopy Techniques for Live Cell Imaging , 2003, Science.

[31]  J. Elf,et al.  Single-molecule investigations of the stringent response machinery in living bacterial cells , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Alex T. Ritter,et al.  The role of the cytoskeleton at the immunological synapse , 2013, Immunological reviews.

[33]  D. Milkie,et al.  Rapid Adaptive Optical Recovery of Optimal Resolution over LargeVolumes , 2014, Nature Methods.

[34]  Shigeo Hayashi,et al.  Improving spinning disk confocal microscopy by preventing pinhole cross-talk for intravital imaging , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[35]  Alexey Khodjakov,et al.  Imaging the division process in living tissue culture cells. , 2006, Methods.

[36]  T. Zimmermann,et al.  Live cell spinning disk microscopy. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[37]  Coates,et al.  Crystallography of optical lattices. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[38]  D. Murphy Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging , 2001 .

[39]  Jessica L. Mark Welch,et al.  Systems-level analysis of microbial community organization through combinatorial labeling and spectral imaging , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  W. Earnshaw,et al.  The cellular geography of Aurora kinases , 2003, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[41]  A. I.,et al.  Neural Field Continuum Limits and the Structure–Function Partitioning of Cognitive–Emotional Brain Networks , 2023, Biology.

[42]  J. Schumacher,et al.  AIR-2: An Aurora/Ipl1-related Protein Kinase Associated with Chromosomes and Midbody Microtubules Is Required for Polar Body Extrusion and Cytokinesis in Caenorhabditis elegans Embryos , 1998, The Journal of cell biology.

[43]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  plusTipTracker: Quantitative image analysis software for the measurement of microtubule dynamics. , 2011, Journal of structural biology.

[44]  Bryant B. Chhun,et al.  Super-Resolution Video Microscopy of Live Cells by Structured Illumination , 2009, Nature Methods.

[45]  Lars Hufnagel,et al.  Multiview light-sheet microscope for rapid in toto imaging , 2012, Nature Methods.

[46]  M. Sixt,et al.  In vitro analysis of chemotactic leukocyte migration in 3D environments. , 2011, Methods in molecular biology.

[47]  E. Betzig,et al.  Proposed method for molecular optical imaging. , 1995, Optics letters.

[48]  G. Gerisch,et al.  Mechanically induced actin-mediated rocketing of phagosomes. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[49]  Douglas N Robinson,et al.  Enlazin, a natural fusion of two classes of canonical cytoskeletal proteins, contributes to cytokinesis dynamics. , 2006, Molecular biology of the cell.

[50]  Ilya Grigoriev,et al.  Dissecting the Nanoscale Distributions and Functions of Microtubule-End-Binding Proteins EB1 and ch-TOG in Interphase HeLa Cells , 2012, PloS one.

[51]  X. Xie,et al.  Single Molecule Imaging of Transcription Factor Binding to DNA in Live Mammalian Cells , 2013, Nature Methods.

[52]  D. Dormann,et al.  Imaging of cell migration , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[53]  M. Davidson,et al.  Noninvasive Imaging beyond the Diffraction Limit of 3D Dynamics in Thickly Fluorescent Specimens , 2012, Cell.

[54]  Jeffry D. Sander,et al.  CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[55]  I. Tolic-Nørrelykke,et al.  Single-molecule imaging in vivo: the dancing building blocks of the cell. , 2013, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[56]  E. Wolf,et al.  Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems, II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system , 1959, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[57]  Howard J. Worman,et al.  Nuclear Membrane Dynamics and Reassembly in Living Cells: Targeting of an Inner Nuclear Membrane Protein in Interphase and Mitosis , 1997, The Journal of cell biology.

[58]  S. Grill Growing up is stressful: biophysical laws of morphogenesis. , 2011, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[59]  I. Bloch Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices , 2005 .

[60]  William M Bement,et al.  Versatile fluorescent probes for actin filaments based on the actin-binding domain of utrophin. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[61]  M. Tokunaga,et al.  Highly inclined thin illumination enables clear single-molecule imaging in cells , 2008, Nature Methods.

[62]  M. Titus,et al.  The Dictyostelium type V myosin MyoJ is responsible for the cortical association and motility of contractile vacuole membranes , 2009, The Journal of cell biology.

[63]  《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》编辑部 Medline , 2001, Current Biology.

[64]  E. Betzig Sparse and composite coherent lattices , 2005 .

[65]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Segmental patterning of heart precursors in Drosophila. , 1995, Development.

[66]  J J Miceli,et al.  Comparison of Bessel and Gaussian beams. , 1988, Optics letters.

[67]  Peter Friedl,et al.  Amoeboid leukocyte crawling through extracellular matrix: lessons from the Dictyostelium paradigm of cell movement , 2001, Journal of leukocyte biology.

[68]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Major signal increase in fluorescence microscopy through dark-state relaxation , 2007, Nature Methods.

[69]  A. Diaspro,et al.  Live-cell 3D super-resolution imaging in thick biological samples , 2011, Nature Methods.

[70]  Roger A Hoskins,et al.  The Carnegie Protein Trap Library: A Versatile Tool for Drosophila Developmental Studies , 2007, Genetics.

[71]  J. Frankel,et al.  From molecules to morphology: cellular organization of Tetrahymena thermophila. , 2012, Methods in cell biology.

[72]  Adam C. Sokolow,et al.  Cell ingression and apical shape oscillations during dorsal closure in Drosophila. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[73]  T. Kirchhausen,et al.  Cisternal organization of the endoplasmic reticulum during mitosis. , 2009, Molecular biology of the cell.

[74]  Eric F. Wieschaus,et al.  Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction , 2009, Nature.

[75]  Michael W. Davidson,et al.  Fundamentals of Light Microscopy and Electronic Imaging: Murphy/Light Microscopy 2E , 2012 .

[76]  N. Takahashi,et al.  Protocadherin LKC, a new candidate for a tumor suppressor of colon and liver cancers, its association with contact inhibition of cell proliferation. , 2002, Carcinogenesis.

[77]  Kathryn L. Parsley,et al.  High-level transduction and gene expression in hematopoietic repopulating cells using a human imunodeficiency virus type 1-based lentiviral vector containing an internal spleen focus forming virus promoter , 2002 .

[78]  S. Tsukita,et al.  The dynamic behavior of the APC-binding protein EB1 on the distal ends of microtubules , 2000, Current Biology.

[79]  N. Stenseth,et al.  Ecological and genetic spatial structuring in the Canadian lynx , 2003, Nature.