Finnish particles mm, jaa and joo as responses to a proposal in negotiation activity

Abstract Negotiation activity, as a form of social interaction, is founded on a proposal sequence. A proposal projects an acceptance or a rejection as the possible next action, and response particles occurring in this position may be heard accordingly. In some languages, response tokens have been identified as weak agreements, and in some cases they may even function as pre-rejections. This study examines Finnish response particles as a resource in negotiation. Using conversation analysis, we analyse the particles mm , jaa and joo which form whole turn-constructional units as responses to proposals. Our data come from psychological interaction tests and encompass 119 sequences with a proposal and an accompanying particle response. The study shows that, despite sharing some functions on a general level, the particles are not interchangeable as far as accepting and committing oneself to a proposal are concerned. Indeed, they constitute a continuum with mm at one end as the least encouraging response particle and joo at the other end as the most encouraging. However, even the most encouraging particle joo is not sufficient to accomplish acceptance of the proposal on its own, but an explicit acceptance or further development of the proposal is needed after the joo .

[1]  Maurice Nevile,et al.  A Conversation Analysis View of Communication as Jointly Accomplished Social Interaction: An Unsuccessful Proposal for a Social Visit , 2009 .

[2]  J. M. Atkinson.  Structures of Social Action: Contents , 1985 .

[3]  E. Schegloff,et al.  A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation , 1974 .

[4]  Anita Pomerantz.  Structures of Social Action: Pursuing a response , 1985 .

[5]  A. Peräkylä,et al.  Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide , 2012 .

[6]  Marja-Leena Sorjonen,et al.  Responding in Conversation: A Study of Response Particles in Finnish , 2001 .

[7]  J. Ruusuvuori.  Managing affect: integration of empathy and problem-solving in health care encounters , 2007 .

[8]  Merja Karjalainen,et al.  RESPONSSIN PUUTTUMINEN PERHENEUVOTTELUSSA , 2013 .

[9]  Melisa Stevanovic.  Prosodic salience and the emergence of new decisions: On approving responses to proposals in Finnish workplace interaction , 2012 .

[10]  L. Wynne,et al.  Genetic boundaries of the schizophrenia spectrum: evidence from the Finnish Adoptive Family Study of Schizophrenia. , 2003, The American journal of psychiatry.

[11]  N. Loveland.  THE RELATION RORSCHACH: A TECHNIQUE FOR STUDYING INTERACTION , 1967, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[12]  Paul ten Have,et al.  Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide , 1999 .

[13]  Judy Davidson.  Structures of Social Action: Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests, and proposals dealing with potential or actual rejection , 1985 .

[14]  Melisa Stevanovic.  Establishing joint decisions in a dyad , 2012 .

[15]  Marja-Leena Sorjonen,et al.  Interaction and grammar: On repeats and responses in Finnish conversations , 1996 .

[16]  E. Couper-Kuhlen.  What does grammar tell us about action , 2014 .

[17]  Charles Goodwin,et al.  Assessments and the Construction of Context , 1992 .

[18]  Anita M. Pomerantz.  Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes , 1984 .

[19]  Peter Muntigl,et al.  Not remembering as a practical epistemic resource in couples therapy , 2010 .

[20]  Marja-Leena Sorjonen.  Recipient activities : particles nii(n) and joo as responses in Finnish conversations , 1997 .

[21]  H. Houtkoop.  Establishing agreement : an analysis of proposal-acceptance sequences , 1987 .

[22]  Ilkka Arminen,et al.  Institutional Interaction: Studies of Talk at Work , 2005 .

[23]  J. Atkinson,et al.  A change-of-state token and aspects of its sequential placement , 1985 .

[24]  Nick Llewellyn.  Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology , 2014 .

[25]  L. Wynne,et al.  Genotype–environment interaction in schizophrenia-spectrum disorder , 2004, British Journal of Psychiatry.