“Optimality of motor and clutch mechanical properties in a generalized model for cell traction forces”
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bo Cheng,et al. Directed cell migration towards softer environments , 2022, Nature Materials.
[2] B. Hinz,et al. Implant Fibrosis and the Underappreciated Role of Myofibroblasts in the Foreign Body Reaction , 2021, Cells.
[3] T. Meyer,et al. Enhanced substrate stress relaxation promotes filopodia-mediated cell migration , 2021, Nature Materials.
[4] V. Brunton,et al. The fibrotic and immune microenvironments as targetable drivers of metastasis , 2020, British journal of cancer.
[5] M. Krieg,et al. The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior , 2020, Science.
[6] P. Bressloff. Stochastic resetting and the mean-field dynamics of focal adhesions. , 2020, Physical review. E.
[7] V. Weaver,et al. Fibrosis and cancer: A strained relationship , 2020, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.
[8] Erik S. Welf,et al. The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints , 2019, bioRxiv.
[9] D. Odde,et al. Emerging technologies in mechanotransduction research. , 2019, Current opinion in chemical biology.
[10] Daniel F. Keefe,et al. Modeling distributed forces within cell adhesions of varying size on continuous substrates , 2019, Cytoskeleton.
[11] A. Dunn,et al. Regulation and dynamics of force transmission at individual cell-matrix adhesion bonds , 2019, Science Advances.
[12] Chaofei Yang,et al. Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration during Bone Formation and Bone Diseases Therapy , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.
[13] Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al. Control of Mechanotransduction by Molecular Clutch Dynamics. , 2018, Trends in cell biology.
[14] Spencer E. Szczesny,et al. Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[15] L. Sander,et al. Stress-induced plasticity of dynamic collagen networks , 2017, Nature Communications.
[16] Y. Odaka,et al. YAP/TAZ-CDC42 signaling regulates vascular tip cell migration , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] C. Broedersz,et al. Cell contraction induces long-ranged stress stiffening in the extracellular matrix , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[18] William I. Weis,et al. Vinculin forms a directionally asymmetric catch bond with F-actin , 2017, Science.
[19] Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al. Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture. , 2017, Biomaterials science.
[20] Peter W. Grimmer,et al. A cytoskeletal clutch mediates cellular force transmission in a soft, three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.
[21] M. Davidson,et al. Integrin-mediated traction force enhances paxillin molecular associations and adhesion dynamics that increase the invasiveness of tumor cells into a three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.
[22] Erkan Tüzel,et al. Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration , 2017, Nature Communications.
[23] Benjamin L. Bangasser,et al. Biphasic Dependence of Glioma Survival and Cell Migration on CD44 Expression Level , 2017, Cell reports.
[24] Clare M. Waterman,et al. The molecular clutch model for mechanotransduction evolves , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.
[25] Cheng Zhu,et al. Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.
[26] S. Dupont,et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in cell-matrix adhesion-mediated signalling and mechanotransduction. , 2016, Experimental cell research.
[27] James C. Weaver,et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.
[28] P. Cerri,et al. Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells , 2015, BioMed research international.
[29] Ben Fabry,et al. Stress controls the mechanics of collagen networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[30] B. Fabry,et al. Biphasic response of cell invasion to matrix stiffness in three-dimensional biopolymer networks. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.
[31] Xavier Trepat,et al. Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types , 2014, Nature materials.
[32] Benjamin L Bangasser,et al. Master Equation-Based Analysis of a Motor-Clutch Model for Cell Traction Force , 2013, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.
[33] Benjamin L Bangasser,et al. Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment. , 2013, Biophysical journal.
[34] M. Buchtová,et al. Early Regression of the Dental Lamina Underlies the Development of Diphyodont Dentitions , 2012, Journal of dental research.
[35] Murat Guvendiren,et al. Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics , 2012, Nature Communications.
[36] Nicola Elvassore,et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.
[37] Ying Li,et al. Model for how retrograde actin flow regulates adhesion traction stresses , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.
[38] U. Schwarz,et al. Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.
[39] Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al. Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.
[40] Ben Fabry,et al. Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[41] Helim Aranda-Espinoza,et al. Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.
[42] David J Odde,et al. Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.
[43] Gaudenz Danuser,et al. Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.
[44] D. Lauffenburger,et al. Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.
[46] S. M. Sims,et al. Regulation of cancer cell migration and bone metastasis by RANKL , 2006, Nature.
[47] Shelly R. Peyton,et al. Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.
[48] M. Sheetz,et al. Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.
[49] N. Balaban,et al. Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.
[50] Timothy J Mitchison,et al. Single-Molecule Speckle Analysis of Actin Filament Turnover in Lamellipodia , 2002, Science.
[51] M. Geeves,et al. Differing ADP Release Rates from Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms Define the Shortening Velocity of Skeletal Muscle Fibers* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[52] W. Saltzman,et al. Micron-scale positioning of features influences the rate of polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration. , 2001, Biophysical journal.
[53] D. Lauffenburger,et al. Getting a grip: new insights for cell adhesion and traction , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.
[54] L. Addadi,et al. Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.
[55] M. Dembo,et al. Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.
[56] C. Reggiani,et al. Sarcomeric Myosin Isoforms: Fine Tuning of a Molecular Motor. , 2000, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.
[57] Sean P. Palecek,et al. Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.
[58] A. Huttenlocher,et al. Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity , 1996, Journal of Cell Biology.
[59] C. Reggiani,et al. Force‐velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.
[60] P. Forscher,et al. Myosin Drives Retrograde F-Actin Flow in Neuronal Growth Cones , 1996, Neuron.
[61] D. Lauffenburger,et al. Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.
[62] P. Forscher,et al. Growth cone advance is inversely proportional to retrograde F-actin flow , 1995, Neuron.
[63] D A Lauffenburger,et al. Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. , 1991, Biophysical journal.
[64] M. Kirschner,et al. Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth , 1988, Neuron.
[65] G. I. Bell. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.
[66] C. Verdier,et al. Traction patterns of tumor cells , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.