“Optimality of motor and clutch mechanical properties in a generalized model for cell traction forces”

The mechanical properties of the extracellular environment influence cell behavior, such as cell morphogenesis, cell migration and cell fate. During the cell migration cycle, cells extend plasma membrane protrusions via actin polymerization, actin filaments move retrogradely via myosin motors and actin polymerization, and the formation of adhesion complexes commonly called clutches mediate the production of traction forces on the extracellular microenvironment allowing the cell to move forward. In this study, we revisited the motor-clutch model for cell migration and derived its mean-field counterpart to study force production of cellular protrusions on compliant substrates. We derived an analytical expression for the optimum substrate stiffness that maximizes force transmission, without unknown adjustable parameters that is valid for all motor-clutch ratio regimes; and determined the required conditions for the protrusion to operate in the clutch-dominated “stalled” regime, the motor-clutch “balanced” regime and motor-dominated “free flowing” regime. We explored these regimes theoretically and obtained an analytical expression for the traction force produced in the limits of low and high myosin activity. We discovered the existence of an optimum clutch stiffness for maximal cellular traction force and identified a biphasic dependence of traction force produced by protrusions on rigid substrates on motor activity and unloaded myosin motor velocity, results that could be tested via novel molecular tension sensor experiments. We additionally showed that clutch reinforcement shifts the optimum substrate and clutch stiffnesses to larger values whereas the optimum substrate stiffness is found to be insensitive to changes in clutch catch bond properties. Overall, our work reveals that altering cell adhesion levels, actomyosin activity and rigidity of clutches and extracellular matrix can cause nontrivial traction force changes and modulated cell migration capabilities that provide insights to effectively design novel cell and stromal-based therapies to treat development and human diseases, such as cancer invasion and metastasis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Adherent cells produce mechanical forces on their environment that critically regulate cell adhesion, signaling and function, essential during developmental events and human disease. Despite recent progress, cell-generated force measurements across a wide range of extracellular stiffnesses and cell states have faced numerous technical challenges. Our mean-field study provides a new generalized analysis of regulation of force transmission by modulation of cellular components and extracellular rigidity. We identify the existence of an intermediate stiffness of cell adhesion complexes for maximum force transmission and find that effective force transmission on rigid environments reduces to a competition between cell adhesion reinforcement and load-dependent dissociation kinetics. The developed model provides important insights to aid design of novel therapeutic strategies for cancers and other diseases.

[1]  Bo Cheng,et al.  Directed cell migration towards softer environments , 2022, Nature Materials.

[2]  B. Hinz,et al.  Implant Fibrosis and the Underappreciated Role of Myofibroblasts in the Foreign Body Reaction , 2021, Cells.

[3]  T. Meyer,et al.  Enhanced substrate stress relaxation promotes filopodia-mediated cell migration , 2021, Nature Materials.

[4]  V. Brunton,et al.  The fibrotic and immune microenvironments as targetable drivers of metastasis , 2020, British journal of cancer.

[5]  M. Krieg,et al.  The nucleus measures shape changes for cellular proprioception to control dynamic cell behavior , 2020, Science.

[6]  P. Bressloff Stochastic resetting and the mean-field dynamics of focal adhesions. , 2020, Physical review. E.

[7]  V. Weaver,et al.  Fibrosis and cancer: A strained relationship , 2020, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.

[8]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints , 2019, bioRxiv.

[9]  D. Odde,et al.  Emerging technologies in mechanotransduction research. , 2019, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[10]  Daniel F. Keefe,et al.  Modeling distributed forces within cell adhesions of varying size on continuous substrates , 2019, Cytoskeleton.

[11]  A. Dunn,et al.  Regulation and dynamics of force transmission at individual cell-matrix adhesion bonds , 2019, Science Advances.

[12]  Chaofei Yang,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell Migration during Bone Formation and Bone Diseases Therapy , 2018, International journal of molecular sciences.

[13]  Pere Roca-Cusachs,et al.  Control of Mechanotransduction by Molecular Clutch Dynamics. , 2018, Trends in cell biology.

[14]  Spencer E. Szczesny,et al.  Matching material and cellular timescales maximizes cell spreading on viscoelastic substrates , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  L. Sander,et al.  Stress-induced plasticity of dynamic collagen networks , 2017, Nature Communications.

[16]  Y. Odaka,et al.  YAP/TAZ-CDC42 signaling regulates vascular tip cell migration , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  C. Broedersz,et al.  Cell contraction induces long-ranged stress stiffening in the extracellular matrix , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  William I. Weis,et al.  Vinculin forms a directionally asymmetric catch bond with F-actin , 2017, Science.

[19]  Ovijit Chaudhuri,et al.  Viscoelastic hydrogels for 3D cell culture. , 2017, Biomaterials science.

[20]  Peter W. Grimmer,et al.  A cytoskeletal clutch mediates cellular force transmission in a soft, three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[21]  M. Davidson,et al.  Integrin-mediated traction force enhances paxillin molecular associations and adhesion dynamics that increase the invasiveness of tumor cells into a three-dimensional extracellular matrix , 2017, Molecular biology of the cell.

[22]  Erkan Tüzel,et al.  Shifting the optimal stiffness for cell migration , 2017, Nature Communications.

[23]  Benjamin L. Bangasser,et al.  Biphasic Dependence of Glioma Survival and Cell Migration on CD44 Expression Level , 2017, Cell reports.

[24]  Clare M. Waterman,et al.  The molecular clutch model for mechanotransduction evolves , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[25]  Cheng Zhu,et al.  Mechanical regulation of a molecular clutch defines force transmission and transduction in response to matrix rigidity , 2016, Nature Cell Biology.

[26]  S. Dupont,et al.  Role of YAP/TAZ in cell-matrix adhesion-mediated signalling and mechanotransduction. , 2016, Experimental cell research.

[27]  James C. Weaver,et al.  Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity , 2015, Nature materials.

[28]  P. Cerri,et al.  Biology of Bone Tissue: Structure, Function, and Factors That Influence Bone Cells , 2015, BioMed research international.

[29]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Stress controls the mechanics of collagen networks , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  B. Fabry,et al.  Biphasic response of cell invasion to matrix stiffness in three-dimensional biopolymer networks. , 2015, Acta biomaterialia.

[31]  Xavier Trepat,et al.  Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types , 2014, Nature materials.

[32]  Benjamin L Bangasser,et al.  Master Equation-Based Analysis of a Motor-Clutch Model for Cell Traction Force , 2013, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[33]  Benjamin L Bangasser,et al.  Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[34]  M. Buchtová,et al.  Early Regression of the Dental Lamina Underlies the Development of Diphyodont Dentitions , 2012, Journal of dental research.

[35]  Murat Guvendiren,et al.  Stiffening hydrogels to probe short- and long-term cellular responses to dynamic mechanics , 2012, Nature Communications.

[36]  Nicola Elvassore,et al.  Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction , 2011, Nature.

[37]  Ying Li,et al.  Model for how retrograde actin flow regulates adhesion traction stresses , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[38]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[39]  Cynthia A. Reinhart-King,et al.  Substrate Stiffness and Cell Area Predict Cellular Traction Stresses in Single Cells and Cells in Contact , 2010, Cellular and molecular bioengineering.

[40]  Ben Fabry,et al.  Single-cell response to stiffness exhibits muscle-like behavior , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Helim Aranda-Espinoza,et al.  Neutrophils display biphasic relationship between migration and substrate stiffness. , 2009, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[42]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[43]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Differential Transmission of Actin Motion Within Focal Adhesions , 2007, Science.

[44]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Migration of tumor cells in 3D matrices is governed by matrix stiffness along with cell-matrix adhesion and proteolysis. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Intrinsic mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix affect the behavior of pre-osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells. , 2006, American journal of physiology. Cell physiology.

[46]  S. M. Sims,et al.  Regulation of cancer cell migration and bone metastasis by RANKL , 2006, Nature.

[47]  Shelly R. Peyton,et al.  Extracellular matrix rigidity governs smooth muscle cell motility in a biphasic fashion , 2005, Journal of cellular physiology.

[48]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[49]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[50]  Timothy J Mitchison,et al.  Single-Molecule Speckle Analysis of Actin Filament Turnover in Lamellipodia , 2002, Science.

[51]  M. Geeves,et al.  Differing ADP Release Rates from Myosin Heavy Chain Isoforms Define the Shortening Velocity of Skeletal Muscle Fibers* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  W. Saltzman,et al.  Micron-scale positioning of features influences the rate of polymorphonuclear leukocyte migration. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[53]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Getting a grip: new insights for cell adhesion and traction , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[54]  L. Addadi,et al.  Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates , 2001, Nature Cell Biology.

[55]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[56]  C. Reggiani,et al.  Sarcomeric Myosin Isoforms: Fine Tuning of a Molecular Motor. , 2000, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[57]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[58]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity , 1996, Journal of Cell Biology.

[59]  C. Reggiani,et al.  Force‐velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. , 1996, The Journal of physiology.

[60]  P. Forscher,et al.  Myosin Drives Retrograde F-Actin Flow in Neuronal Growth Cones , 1996, Neuron.

[61]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[62]  P. Forscher,et al.  Growth cone advance is inversely proportional to retrograde F-actin flow , 1995, Neuron.

[63]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[64]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Cytoskeletal dynamics and nerve growth , 1988, Neuron.

[65]  G. I. Bell Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. , 1978, Science.

[66]  C. Verdier,et al.  Traction patterns of tumor cells , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.