Adding Value to Innovation: Impressionism and the Transformation of the Selection System in Visual Arts

Valuation of cultural products tends to be problematic. In this paper, we provide insight into how valuation of cultural products takes place by describing the changing role and significance of different types of selection systems. Three basic types of selection systems are distinguished: market selection, peer selection, and expert selection. We show that the rise of a group of painters known as the Impressionists was facilitated by a change in the selection system of the visual arts industry from one dominated by peers into one dominated by experts. In the new selection system, innovativeness has become the most highly prized product characteristic, while a range of experts have begun to play an essential role, certifying the innovativeness of either individual artists or groups of artists.

[1]  James Heilbrun,et al.  The Economics of Art and Culture , 2002 .

[2]  Jamal Shamsie,et al.  Critical Push: Strategies for Creating Momentum in the Motion Picture Industry , 2000 .

[3]  G. Gemser,et al.  Appropriability of Design Innovations: A Case Analysis of the Design Furniture Industry in Italy and the Netherlands , 1999 .

[4]  N. Wijnberg.  Human Bodies in Chinese and European Painting , 1999 .

[5]  Toby E. Stuart.  Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-Technology Industry , 1998 .

[6]  N. Wijnberg.  Art and Appropriability in Renaissance Italy and The Netherlands in the Seventeenth Century: The Role of the Academy , 1997 .

[7]  Steven M. Shugan,et al.  Film Critics: Influencers or Predictors? , 1997 .

[8]  N. Wijnberg.  The Accademia Del Disegno and the Art Industry , 1997 .

[9]  Nachoem M. Wijnberg,et al.  Selection processes and appropriability in art, science and technology , 1995 .

[10]  Toby E. Stuart,et al.  A Role-Based Ecology of Technological Change , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Michael C. Fitzgerald.  Making Modernism: Picasso and the Creation of the Market for Twentieth-Century Art , 1994 .

[12]  H. Rao.  The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry: 1895–1912 , 1994 .

[13]  R. Jensen.  Marketing Modernism in Fin-de-Siècle Europe , 1994 .

[14]  Gary Tinterow,et al.  Origins of impressionism , 1994 .

[15]  S. Levine.  Monet, Narcissus, and Self-Reflection: The Modernist Myth of the Self , 1994 .

[16]  D. Throsby.  The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics , 1994 .

[17]  Johnny Golding.  Visions of the modern , 1994 .

[18]  Gianfranco Mossetto.  Aesthetics and Economics , 1993 .

[19]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[20]  Robert Wuthnow,et al.  Reputational Status of Organizations in Technical Systems , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[21]  V. Kerry Smith,et al.  Successful movies: A preliminary empirical analysis , 1986 .

[22]  Jerrine E. Mitchell,et al.  Painters and Public Life in Eighteenth-Century Paris. , 1987 .

[23]  P. Hirsch.  Processing Fads and Fashions: An Organization-Set Analysis of Cultural Industry Systems , 1972, American Journal of Sociology.

[24]  R. Merton.  The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[25]  H. White,et al.  Canvases and Careers: Institutional Change in the French Painting World. , 1966 .

[26]  G. H. Hamilton.  Manet and his critics , 1954 .

[27]  John Rewald,et al.  The history of impressionism , 1947 .