Use of the DISCERN tool for evaluating web searches in childhood epilepsy

Epilepsy is an important cause of neurological disability in children. Nowadays, an increasing number of parents or caregivers use the Internet as a source of health information concerning symptoms, therapy, and prognosis of epilepsy occurring during childhood. Therefore, high-quality websites are necessary to satisfy this request. Using the DISCERN tool, we evaluated online information on childhood epilepsy provided by the first 50 links displayed on the Google search engine. The same links were evaluated by a team of pediatric neurologists (PNs) and by a lay subject (LS). The evaluation performed by the PNs found out that only 9.6% of the websites showed good reliability, that only 7.2% of the websites had a good quality of information on treatment choices, and that only 21.5% of the websites showed good overall quality of the content. With regard to the evaluation performed by the neutral subject, it was found that 21.4% of the websites showed good reliability, that 59.5% of the websites showed poor quality of information on treatment choices, and that only 2% of the websites showed good overall quality of the content. Our conclusion is that online information about childhood epilepsy still lacks reliability, accuracy, and relevance as well as fails to provide a thorough review of treatment choices.

[1]  Ailish Hannigan,et al.  Generic medicines: an evaluation of the accuracy and accessibility of information available on the internet , 2013, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[2]  Paul Kim,et al.  Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review , 1999, BMJ.

[3]  Gbogboade Ademiluyi,et al.  Evaluating the reliability and validity of three tools to assess the quality of health information on the Internet. , 2003, Patient education and counseling.

[4]  M. Breckons,et al.  What Do Evaluation Instruments Tell Us About the Quality of Complementary Medicine Information on the Internet? , 2007, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Suresh Subramani,et al.  Evaluation of online health information on clubfoot using the DISCERN tool , 2014, Journal of pediatric orthopedics. Part B.

[6]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[7]  L. Cowan.  The epidemiology of the epilepsies in children. , 2002, Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews.

[8]  Faisal Hanif,et al.  The role of quality tools in assessing reliability of the Internet for health information , 2009, Informatics for health & social care.

[9]  Elmer V. Bernstam,et al.  Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the World Wide Web: what can our patients actually use? , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  P. Jallon.  The Problem of Intractability: The Continuing Need for New Medical Therapies in Epilepsy , 1997, Epilepsia.

[11]  Thomas Hadjistavropoulos,et al.  Evaluation of chronic pain-related information available to consumers on the Internet. , 2013, Pain medicine.

[12]  Kenneth Lee,et al.  Interventions to Assist Health Consumers to Find Reliable Online Health Information: A Comprehensive Review , 2014, PloS one.

[13]  H. Bastian.  Health literacy and patient information: developing the methodology for a national evidence-based health website. , 2008, Patient education and counseling.

[14]  Peter A. Bath,et al.  Development of a patient-oriented tool for evaluating the quality of breast cancer information on the Internet , 2008, MIE.

[15]  K. Prasad,et al.  Development and validation of a tool to evaluate the quality of medical education websites in pathology , 2013, Journal of pathology informatics.